Replying to The Silent sea
Unregistered User Info
Enter your Name
Code Buttons
 Guided Mode
 Normal Mode
  Close all Tags

Open Tags:   
Enter your Post
Clickable Smilies
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie  
Show All

Post Options  Enable emoticons?
 Enable signature?
Original Post to Quote
You may edit the post you are quoting here
Post Icons
Cancel Post
Send Post
                                
                                
  [ Use None ]
User Verification To keep away spam, please complete the following:
 



Last 10 Posts [ In reverse order ]
oldshack Posted on May 11 2010, 02:14 AM
  one of the errors in The Silent Sea is about Plutonium. The power supply for a satellite would use Pu 238 with some sort of heat to electrical conversion. Pu 238 can not be used as a nuclear weapon. The weapons stuff is Pu 239 which because of its very long halflife gives off so little heat it would be useless as a heat source to make electricity and would never be put in a satellite for that purpose. Argentina might like to get Pu 238 but not to make nuclear weapons out of it. I used to work at DOE with this stuff!
pink little birdie Posted on May 10 2010, 12:57 PM
  I liked the book and didn't pick up on any of the errors. but then I was reading when I was really tired and I suck at geography. I sort of guess the locations of US states even...

I wanted to know what the log they found in the tin was.
Antipodean Andy Posted on May 6 2010, 12:58 PM
 
QUOTE (Joe Hopasagabus @ Apr 27 2010, 05:42 PM)
OK, if you say so. Seems odd to me an author of CC's standing doesn't do better research since there have been many errors about so many things. Wasn't there something about the location of Montreal in the first Issac Bell book ? Surely, he must have known where Montreal is.

Ah, but CC doesn't write the Oregon Files, the NUMA Files, the Fargos etc so he's not responsible for all of the research errors. Fair enough he stuffed up Montreal...
Lat Posted on Apr 28 2010, 04:58 PM
  Most probably, I didn't remember the other Malvinas. On another forum one published author also said how many times he and the editing team read his one book, and no-one picked up that he accidentally changed a main character's name.

I just haven't quite forgiven Jack for calling the Namib the Kalahari.... (all tongue in the cheek).

Maybe while writing so much about a cold place you would really want to go scuba diving in the Maldives.
Nick Kismet Posted on Apr 28 2010, 03:47 PM
  Lat, I'm reading Silent Sea right now, and while I'm not up to chapter 22 yet, I have encountered one instance where the correct name "Islas Malvinas" was used. That tells me this wasn't a research error, but either simply a typo (and you can never, ever root out all the typos) or more likely some kind of auto-correct error.

You'd be surprised how often the computer decides you were trying to write something else and "fixes" it for you.
Joe Hopasagabus Posted on Apr 27 2010, 05:42 PM
  OK, if you say so. Seems odd to me an author of CC's standing doesn't do better research since there have been many errors about so many things. Wasn't there something about the location of Montreal in the first Issac Bell book ? Surely, he must have known where Montreal is.
Nick Kismet Posted on Apr 27 2010, 02:28 PM
  Well, I'm not a bestselling author (yet) but I do know this:

You research the things you're not sure about. If you know something to be true, you usually don't check yourself. And if you happen to be wrong about it....
Joe Hopasagabus Posted on Apr 27 2010, 02:08 PM
  Why doesn't a best selling author like CC have a crackerjack research team? I read articles that quote CC as saying he does meticulous research, yet there are so many errors.
Lat Posted on Apr 27 2010, 06:08 AM
  Yip, I also remembered the Malvinas from the Falklands war. Plus every local scuba diver goes to the Maldives, so I knew it ain't close to Argentina.
Nick Kismet Posted on Apr 27 2010, 03:31 AM
  It was Malvinas, not Maldives. I remember that from the Falkland Islands War. There is also another island group called the Malvinas, which led to some confusion back then, and perhaps that's the source of confusion this time out as well.
Review the complete topic (launches new window)

Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1719 seconds | Archive
Untitled Document

CLIVE CUSSLER FORUM

Choose a user id, register today, and be a part of the world's largest active Cussler forum. no fees


Keep your email address here updated to ensure that you receive breaking news!



mayday the mediterranean caper iceberg raise the titanic vixen 03 night probe pacific vortex deep six cyclops treasure dragon sahara inca gold shock wave the sea hunters flood tide dirk pitt revealed serpent atlantis found blue gold valhalla rising fire ice the sea hunters 2 white death golden buddha trojan odyssey lost city sacred stone black wind dark watch treasure of khan arctic drift polar shift the navigator skeleton coast plague ship vin fizz the chase

clive cussler dirk cussler craig dirgo paul kemprecos dirk pitt al giordino matthew mcconaughey penelope cruz

author sign signing signed rare scarce club fansite fan site tony krome book used books rare book store library nautical maritime ocean sea adventure writing clubs collector's club collector's clubs Collectors clubs cussler's new book forum chat discussion collect cussler collection clive cussler forum ccforum message board

sahara the movie new sahara film crusader productions paramount morocco spain red tide sahara trailer movie trailer sahara preview clive cussler sahara