| Welcome to Intellectua. We hope you enjoy your visit.
You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:
|
Why The Divisions Between Religions?, Why?
| RavingRiddler |
|
New Member

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Member No.: 87
Joined: 23-November 04

|
Why is there antagonism between different religions?
Take Christianity and Islam.
They both believe in one God.
Take Hinduism. Seemingly polytheistic, yet they also believe in one supreme.
Allah. Brahman. Yahweh. Whatever named, one supreme.
I don't get it. They all seem to be the same thing...
|
|
|
| hermit |
|
Member
 
Group: Members
Posts: 21
Member No.: 82
Joined: 12-November 04

|
.... or between Prostestants and catholics. In Bautzen, a town in Saxony, the cathedral is catually split in two by a wall - which was built when the city's population, about evenly divided into catholics and protestants, decided to split the cathedral too. They did agree to this though, and in a time where religious warfare was rampant in Central europe this was as progressive as it possibly could have been.
The way I see it, the reason for these scisms and the wars and slaughter they always seem to bring with them is a result of monotheist faiths' belief in having the absolute, one and only truth with their beliefs, and everyone else is wrong, stupid and heathen (and worth as much as vermin). Polytheist faiths - while in no way wnders of tolerance - have a much less hard time, since they're basically many cults in one already, and neither Jupiter's not Neptune's or Mercury's disciples are in posession of truth.
Now, I KNOW polytheist faiths aren't the ultimate in tolerance, but there're hardly any instances of these faiths undergoing such drastic scisms as all monotheist faiths (Judaism split into today's Jews and Christians, and these split into the Catholics' "World Church" and several Protestant sects; Islam split into Sunnis and Shites, and Shiites split into tosday's Shiites and Ismaelites ...). They're generally also more tolerant of completely foreign faiths.
|
|
|
| D.Foxy |
|
Regular Member
    
Group: Members
Posts: 363
Member No.: 54
Joined: 13-August 04

|
A thought. In many parts of Europe, the majority of people are not religious and even those who are are religious don't want to fight about it. But it seems that there is a group who are willing to fight about...football! And another group that wants to fight anybody whose face, language or skin looks different. (In the Balkan area, except for Islam, people aren't devoutly religious. That didn't prevent large-scale massacres in the 1990s! Or husbands and wives of different ethnic groups divorcing and fighting on opposite sides...sometimes without even divorcing...) So I wonder: if, as John Lennon dreamed, there were no religions, no heaven and no hell to believe in, would there be universal peace? Or have there and will there always be the bigoted, the murderous, the ant-social among us, and are they not simply using religion as an excuse for their tendencies?
|
|
|
| hermit |
|
Member
 
Group: Members
Posts: 21
Member No.: 82
Joined: 12-November 04

|
Oh come on. Hooliganism isn't quite a mass movement (and besides, there's hooliganism in the states too, though it's not tied to sports events but university parties).
And the people of the Balkans aren't religious?Beg your pardon? The Serrbian Orthodox Church played a very unfortunate part under Milosevic, claiming being the one and only TRUE faith and all, and Serbs generally are pretty religious by European standards. Besides, other factors - nationalism, the idea of revenge and feuds dating back to Ottoman times - played a great role in the Balkan wars too.
| QUOTE | | So I wonder: if, as John Lennon dreamed, there were no religions, no heaven and no hell to believe in, would there be universal peace? |
Surely not. People would still be agressive, divisive, and squarreling, The world would just lack bigotry, as can be seen in the US where "pro-lifers" almost always support the death sentence - and the man proclaiming a new "culture of life" has only one thing to say about the death of tens of thousands of civilians at the hands of his armed forces - "stuff happens".
There will never be universal peace, but with "no religion, no heaven and hell", there would at least be one major reason to kill one another less. Actually, for every religion to give up the claim to be the one and only truth would suffice.
|
|
|
| hermit |
|
Member
 
Group: Members
Posts: 21
Member No.: 82
Joined: 12-November 04

|
1. Feminazis. Of course, there're radical feminists. I know some myself. However, lobbing away at (of course, lesbian) radical feminists, like you have been doing in the abortion thread over at the Drawbridge. Me, I don't like any radicals. There're not many of that kind over here, luckily; our feminists are more practical and usually do wear makeup too. What you mentioned int hat thread showexd you to be quite bigot too, though. Why no word about men pressuring women to abort their baby because it could screw with THEIR career plans? Or just because they don't want a kid? Hunh? But that's seriously off topic.
2. | QUOTE | | And the number of observant, pious Roman Catholics among the Croats is even less. |
I wasn't saying they're religious fanatics or even just as fundamentalist as most Americans are, but the fact that religious differences played a MAJOR role in Milosevic's reasoning about the wars remains.
| QUOTE | | Plus the fact that I have travelled in Bosnia, and every single Bosnian Muslim I met ate pork and drank rakia... |
That could be said of one of the 9-11 terrorists too. Doesn't change anything about the fact he died in an act of religious-based terrorism, as a suicide assassin.
People may not live their faith by the book, but still take it seriously enough to go and kill others on behalf of them being 'evil'.
3.
| QUOTE | | Religious charities of all denominations have donated trillions ...sent medical missions to the remote parts of the world...educated...even started political movements (quick quiz: which group agitated to end FORMAL slavery [and Hermit, please note my adjectives!] in the period 1830-70??). |
I don't know their name, but it was a religious group who, having reat the bible, concluded that Christ actually DID say that slavery was bad. And the bible's ruling on slavery being bad was so strict, it even applied to them Niggers. Didn't, of course, end informal slavery, or the apartheid that evolved out of it later on, or the still quite widespread prejudices and arrogance on part of white Americans against them.
On that note, my US folks disinherited one of their daughters because she was dating a Black man. Just so that you don't tell me I cannot tell you of any examples.
And, of course, religius charities.
US religious charities donate billions to educating Africans that condoms won't help against AIDS. In my book, that's nothing short of genocide. Yes, religious charities do a lot of good. Like US missionaries who do their best to destroy indigenous cultures and spread the word of Christ so the final days may come sooner. I certainly see much good in that. But, of course, that's no news in Bush's US.
Also, muslim religious charities were the main sponsor of people who did great things, such as 9-11. And are the main fund raisers for heroic groups that promote goodness and world peace like Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, who do all in their power to promote understanding and peace in teh Middle East. They educate young Palestinians too, for free, about things such as the protocols of the Wisem Men of Zion, why the Holocaust never happened and how to make explosives from easily available household items.
Goodness whereever I look with charities. Yes, religious charities spend billions, but if even half of that goes to actually genuinely charitable work with no second thoughts, I'd be quite surprised. They're a mixed blessing at best.
|
|
|
 Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience.
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
|