Tomb Kings of Khemri Forum -> Expanding Our Coverage?

Expanding Our Coverage?, To embrave Necrons, our 40k equivalents.

Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic

Swissdictator	Posted on May 17 2010, 11:41 AM
Skeleton Charioteer Group: Liche High Priest Posts: 225 Member No.: 2,261 Joined: 18-April 08	I know, this is a TK site and Warhammer board. Though many players play both 40k and Warhammer. Since Necrons are roughly the equivalent of Tomb Kings (although certainly much more evil) a thought crossed my mind. Would it it be out of line to include a few forums for the Necron players out there? I have not seen a Necron forum out there. Hosting a few sections (40k general, Necron tactics, necron lists, and necron painting/convertings... might bring more people here. Some of them might not play Tomb Kings, but might still play fantasy so will take an interest in the fantasy emphasis on the site. Edit: Regardless of your choice, I do ask you post something explaining your thoughts a little more fully. Edit2: Don't do a null vote (view results) as it won't let you vote after doing so. I found that out the hard way! My vote is for, yes. --------------------

Mioumboy	Posted on May 17 2010, 01:51 PM
Tomb Prince Group: Liche High Priest Posts: 1,774 Member No.: 600 Joined: 26-March 05	I voted no, when I come here it's to read/talk about Tomb Kings. We are a specialised forum and should stay like this. -------------------- My TK painting and modelling log! My Empire modelling log Your Skeletons Alternative

Cbt	Posted on May 17 2010, 04:39 PM
Khemrian Lord - Warhamster Group: Hierophant Posts: 2,422 Member No.: 269 Joined: 17-August 04	I understand what your saying but I very much doubt that we'll attract a necron player to a fantasy board, there are fantasy sites out there that deal with multiple armies but not multiple systems. However there's nothing to stop you making up your own one and we could link ideas to it. Cbt -------------------- Clickable links below. Tomb King Armies Forum Moderator guide lines armies forum, summary below A: Constructive criticism - No one's right it's just their opinion B: Proper full answers - don't just say it's rubbish, explain why (see A above) C: Unrealistic lists - fun lists are all well and good but don't expect many comments unless you can prove you have the figures - you have how many Bone Giants? D: Don�t expect a review of larger armies, as they have more troops available to them and more options available critiquing this kind of list is a somewhat mute point as there are too many variables and is usually done to personal opinion or army theme. E: Taking criticism - Your opinion my differ from others, if you don't like it don't post your list for review. See A above. F: Try not to state the obvious - we all know a chariot is pulled by a horse, don't waste space and list it - see Suggested format below. Suggested format of your armies Rules book changed July 10th 2010 - all army lists should be based on this 8th Edn My Current 2000 point army My Entire Army as at 10/08/2007 6th edition changed to 7th on the 9th September 2006

Swissdictator	Posted on May 17 2010, 05:23 PM
Skeleton Charioteer Group: Liche High Priest Posts: 225 Member No.: 2,261 Joined: 18-April 08	Fair enough, I was a bit hesitant anyways. Besides, for the hobbyist aspect we have the off topic painting section anyways. --------------------

Willmark	Posted on May 17 2010, 08:27 PM
A bug in the Swarm Group: Nehekharan Posts: 14 Member No.: 2,816 Joined: 22-February 09	No but for a different reason. 40k should stay with 40k. However, that said this is a Warhammer board first and a specific Warhammer army board second. All to often people forget that. My 2 pfennigs. -------------------- www.chaos-dwarfs.com www.dogsofwaronline.com

Chameleon	Posted on May 18 2010, 01:12 AM
Necropolis Guard Group: Faithful Posts: 548 Member No.: 1,574 Joined: 27-February 07	I too prefer it to be fantasy only. "Population" will increase with 8th edition and then even more so with the release of the new book. -------------------- My painting Log's

KramDratta	Posted on May 20 2010, 04:55 PM
Skeleton Charioteer Group: Faithful Posts: 282 Member No.: 3,073 Joined: 6-May 10	As the others said, I prefer to keep this site for Fantasy only. My guess is that there are many more Tomb Kings players out there, it just that they're waiting for the new book.

Cyana Ra	Posted on May 21 2010, 03:06 PM
Skeleton Horseman Group: Nehekharan Posts: 102 Member No.: 2,967 Joined: 27-July 09	I can live with a 40k board on our forums, but I prefer to keep the forums in the way they are now. I voted "maybe" -------------------- We break our enemies with fear!

Vallah

Posted on Jun 17 2010, 11:43 AM

Cunning Linguist

Group: Faithful
Posts: 1,284
Member No.: 2,955
Joined: 11-July 09

QUOTE (Mioumboy @ May 17 2010, 06:51 PM)

I voted no, when I come here it's to read/talk about Tomb Kings. We are a specialised forum and should stay like this.

This pretty much sums up my thoughts too, hence the 'no' vote.

--------------------

�Perpetual Optimism is a Force Multiplier.� - Colin Powell

"The secret of success in battle lies often not so much in the use of one's own strength but in the exploitation of the other side's weaknesses.� - John Christopher

Legions of Ankhira Nefherer army plog

amentut6	Posted on Jul 15 2010, 08:02 PM
Skeleton Warrior Group: Nehekharan Posts: 97 Member No.: 3,012 Joined: 29-October 09	i got necrons but i think that this should stay a tomb king only place my 2 bones worth -------------------- buired beneath the sands lost for all time W -0 L - 1 D -0

Cbt	Posted on Jul 16 2010, 01:12 AM
Khemrian Lord - Warhamster Group: Hierophant Posts: 2,422 Member No.: 269 Joined: 17-August 04	OK guys, this poll has been up for a while now, to be honest not many people have voted considering the overall number of members we have but there is a feeling that we'd put necrons in a separate section - however there is a significant swing to say that this should remain a pure fantasy site, therefore there will be no amendment to the forum list and we will carry on normal jogging. All the best Cbt -------------------- Clickable links below. Tomb King Armies Forum Moderator guide lines armies forum, summary below A: Constructive criticism - No one's right it's just their opinion B: Proper full answers - don't just say it's rubbish, explain why (see A above) C: Unrealistic lists - fun lists are all well and good but don't expect many comments unless you can prove you have the figures - you have how many Bone Giants? D: Don�t expect a review of larger armies, as they have more troops available to them and more options available critiquing this kind of list is a somewhat mute point as there are too many variables and is usually done to personal opinion or army theme. E: Taking criticism - Your opinion my differ from others, if you don't like it don't post your list for review. See A above. F: Try not to state the obvious - we all know a chariot is pulled by a horse, don't waste space and list it - see Suggested format below. Suggested format of your armies Rules book changed July 10th 2010 - all army lists should be based on this 8th Edn My Current 2000 point army My Entire Army as at 10/08/2007 6th edition changed to 7th on the 9th September 2006

« Next Oldest | Forum Announcements | Next Newest »

Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
Learn More · Register for Free

Expanding Our Coverage?
Yes, let's have some Necron sections.	[ 0 ]	[0.00%]
No, let's keep it more fantasy orientated.	[ 11 ]	[61.11%]
Maybe, as long as the 40k stuff is an separate section.	[ 7 ]	[38.89%]
Total Votes: 18