Michigan Chess Forums


 

 Chess Programs
Zeek
Posted: Jun 15 2009, 11:40 PM


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 9
Member No.: 519
Joined: 4-June 09



Hello all,

I've been using Chessmaster 10th Edition to assist me in analyzing my games, and from what I can tell it seems to be doing a pretty good job spotting tactical blunders. I was wondering if there's much of a difference between the capabilities of Fritz and CM and whether it's worth upgrading? Thanks for the feedback.
Top
tonywest
Posted: Jun 17 2009, 07:47 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 79
Member No.: 20
Joined: 21-May 07



QUOTE (Zeek @ Jun 16 2009, 12:40 AM)
Hello all,

I've been using Chessmaster 10th Edition to assist me in analyzing my games, and from what I can tell it seems to be doing a pretty good job spotting tactical blunders. I was wondering if there's much of a difference between the capabilities of Fritz and CM and whether it's worth upgrading? Thanks for the feedback.

I have both programs. Personally, I think that if all you use it for is tactical blunders, then Chessmaster is fine. I think Fritz does a better job analyzing positional play. Most strong players that I've spoken with about this think that anybody rated below 2000 should analyze their own games and only then use a machine to check for blunders.

I personally like Fritz because I think the layout is better and it is easier to use than Chessmaster. But if you are happy with Chessmaster I see no reason to upgrade.

Tony
Top
Zeek
Posted: Jun 18 2009, 11:06 PM


Newbie


Group: Members
Posts: 9
Member No.: 519
Joined: 4-June 09



Alright, thanks for your help!
Top
« Next Oldest | General | Next Newest »


Topic Options



Hosted for free by InvisionFree (Terms of Use: Updated 7/7/05) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.0535 seconds | Archive