Create a free forum in seconds.
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Welcome to Nsdraftroom. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


Pages: (2) [1] 2  ( Go to first unread post )

 ULDV-2 Andrewsarchus, wheeeee
RRoan
Posted: Sep 3 2011, 04:51 AM


38% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 776
Member No.: 674
Joined: 20-February 09



ULDV-2 “Andrewsarchus”

user posted image

Designations
CV84 (Contractor Model Number)
ULDV-2 “Andrewsarchus” (Senestrian military designation)

Dimensions
Hull length: 55,102mm
Length (Gun-Forward): 86,252mm
Height (to turret roof): 13,041mm
Width: 26,419mm
Width (without skirts): 24,341mm
Mass: 19,524 tonnes.
Ground Clearance: Variable, 1,640mm Default

Key Data
Crew: 22
Fuel Capacity: 695,400 Liters
Purchase Price: 6.695 Billion NSD

Power Pack: Oten-Marks SSPM J1784-2
Engine: Twin STC-100000 Turbine
Power: 100,000 bhp per engine
Transmission: Electric
Fuel Consumption: 1135 l/km

Running Gear
Suspension: In-Arm Active Electromagnetic Suspension
Road Wheels: 41 Per Side, Rubber-Tired
Length of Track on Ground: 38,912mm
Width of Track: 7,939mm
Area Per Track: 3,089,224 cm2

Performance
Maximum Speed (Governed): 20 km/h
Power to Weight Ratio: 10.24 hp/tonne
Range: 613 km
Ground Pressure: 3.16 kgf/cm2 (45 PSI)

Armament
Main Armament: Elaris 450mm L106 Regenerative Liquid Bipropellant Smoothbore ETC Gun (60 rounds)
1st Coaxial: Elaris HRC-140 140mm Revolver Cannon (200 rounds)
2nd Coaxial: Elaris HAC-50 50mm Compact Autocannon (2,500 rounds)
3rd Coaxial: Lysman LA-19 15.5 x 120 HMG (10,000 rounds)
Command Turret Armament: HAC-50 50mm Compact Autocannon (200 rounds)
Command Turret Coaxial: Lysman LA-19 15.5 x 120 HMG (1,500 rounds)
Commander's Weapon: Lysman LA-19 15.5 x 120 HMG (500 rounds)
Additional Armament: Twin 2x120mm Automatic Mortar Turrets (130 rounds per turret)

Armor, Protection, and Countermeasures
Chassis: Welded armor steel with composite reinforcement
Armor: High-protection composite armor scheme providing unrivalled all-around protection.
NBC Protection: Completely sealed, radiation-shielded crew areas with air-recycling equipment.
APS: High-protection comprehensive APS suite including a variety of hard-kill and soft-kill systems.

Sensors
Moar than you can shake a stick at.


--------------------
To the daring belongs the future...
Top
Vault X
Posted: Sep 3 2011, 06:09 AM


Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 6,424
Member No.: 937
Joined: 16-July 10



Big gun is too short and lacks one of 'em bore evacuators. You don't want no frigging gun without no frigging bore evacuator.

Give the coaxial gun a silencer, you're electric, so you go sneak up on your enemy's and cap'em, no one gonna see no thing.

Your commander needs a bigger gun, or he ain't no commander, fifteens are street level, gotta git him a thirty.

Don't need no APS, need moar Goalkeeper CIWS.


--------------------
user posted image
Top
Kyiv
Posted: Sep 3 2011, 06:36 AM


My tank is umbrella!


Group: Members
Posts: 2,910
Member No.: 401
Joined: 3-June 08



7m rule.


--------------------
QUOTE
i think it is you that is the fool.My education was brought with money, not from wikipedia!


QUOTE (Rich and Corporations @ Apr 16 2012, 10:06 PM)
Oh my god, everyone is either wrong or fucking stupid.
Top
Allanea
Posted: Sep 3 2011, 07:09 AM


You have way too much time on your hands ...


Group: Moderators
Posts: 3,729
Member No.: 88
Joined: 27-May 07



Why is there a crew of 25?


I can see a commander, a driver, a signal operator, a gunner. Perhaps a mechanic. What do all the other people do?


--------------------
user posted imageuser posted image


"That's fucking epic!" ~~ Scandavian States, on my translations
" Fucking awesome. Do more." ~~Questers, on my translations
Top
Estusia
Posted: Sep 3 2011, 07:44 AM


14% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 293
Member No.: 1,037
Joined: 26-December 10



UAV docks, vertical launch SAMs and APS

add a hanger inside for a dismount component of 6 midget tanks while you're at it


--------------------


user posted image
roflroflroflrofl
Top
Samozaryadnyastan
Posted: Sep 3 2011, 08:31 AM


85% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,713
Member No.: 1,101
Joined: 13-April 11



Use as siege tank.
Take Stalingrad and Sevastopol.

I approve of SPAAG variant and use of Goalkeepr CIWS turrets.


--------------------
One day, I will actually know what the fuck I'm talking about.

Samozniy Military Industries
Starting alliances and ending wars since 2011.

QUOTE (Falls @ Sep 10 2012, 05:14 PM)

QUOTE (Samozaryadnyastan @ Sep 10 2012, 03:24 PM)

What're those three ships tailing at the back?

a good general guess if you look closely is, grossly superior to foreign counter-parts.
Top
Allanea
Posted: Sep 3 2011, 09:30 AM


You have way too much time on your hands ...


Group: Moderators
Posts: 3,729
Member No.: 88
Joined: 27-May 07



Why are we not just deploying a pile of 400mm self-propelled guns instead?


--------------------
user posted imageuser posted image


"That's fucking epic!" ~~ Scandavian States, on my translations
" Fucking awesome. Do more." ~~Questers, on my translations
Top
Samozaryadnyastan
Posted: Sep 3 2011, 09:48 AM


85% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,713
Member No.: 1,101
Joined: 13-April 11



As opposed to?


--------------------
One day, I will actually know what the fuck I'm talking about.

Samozniy Military Industries
Starting alliances and ending wars since 2011.

QUOTE (Falls @ Sep 10 2012, 05:14 PM)

QUOTE (Samozaryadnyastan @ Sep 10 2012, 03:24 PM)

What're those three ships tailing at the back?

a good general guess if you look closely is, grossly superior to foreign counter-parts.
Top
Allanea
Posted: Sep 3 2011, 10:03 AM


You have way too much time on your hands ...


Group: Moderators
Posts: 3,729
Member No.: 88
Joined: 27-May 07



Ooodles of 400mm artillery guns instead of this tank.


--------------------
user posted imageuser posted image


"That's fucking epic!" ~~ Scandavian States, on my translations
" Fucking awesome. Do more." ~~Questers, on my translations
Top
Samozaryadnyastan
Posted: Sep 3 2011, 10:35 AM


85% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,713
Member No.: 1,101
Joined: 13-April 11



Because lol.

I'm just imagining this with a trio of Goalkeeper guns on the turret roof.
IMPENETRABLE


--------------------
One day, I will actually know what the fuck I'm talking about.

Samozniy Military Industries
Starting alliances and ending wars since 2011.

QUOTE (Falls @ Sep 10 2012, 05:14 PM)

QUOTE (Samozaryadnyastan @ Sep 10 2012, 03:24 PM)

What're those three ships tailing at the back?

a good general guess if you look closely is, grossly superior to foreign counter-parts.
Top
Ekraysia
Posted: Sep 3 2011, 03:24 PM


68% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,360
Member No.: 710
Joined: 9-May 09



When you sell this on II could you forward us the link
Top
RRoan
Posted: Sep 4 2011, 04:25 AM


38% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 776
Member No.: 674
Joined: 20-February 09



QUOTE (Vault X @ Sep 3 2011, 06:09 AM)
Big gun is too short and lacks one of 'em bore evacuators. You don't want no frigging gun without no frigging bore evacuator.


The gun is sufficiently long and powerful to place projectiles into suborbital trajectories, like an extra-lolzy version of the HARP gun. It uses a compressed gas system to clear the bore, and by "compressed gas" I actually mean "burst of engine exhaust".

QUOTE (Vault X @ Sep 3 2011, 06:09 AM)
Give the coaxial gun a silencer, you're electric, so you go sneak up on your enemy's and cap'em, no one gonna see no thing.


GENIUS

It's even large enough to accommodate a large-caliber silencer!

QUOTE (Vault X @ Sep 3 2011, 06:09 AM)
Your commander needs a bigger gun, or he ain't no commander, fifteens are street level, gotta git him a thirty.


The command turret can be slaved to the commander's sight if needed, like some sort of demented 50mm RWS.

QUOTE (Vault X @ Sep 3 2011, 06:09 AM)
Don't need no APS, need moar Goalkeeper CIWS.


The mounted APS is intended as a last resort against munitions which get through the screening point-defense superheavies, which mount dedicated defensive weapons systems ranging from gatling CIWS to ABM missiles.

QUOTE (Kyiv @ Sep 3 2011, 06:36 AM)
7m rule.


go eat a dick

QUOTE (Allanea @ Sep 3 2011, 07:09 AM)
Why is there a crew of 25?


I can see a commander, a driver, a signal operator, a gunner. Perhaps a mechanic. What do all the other people do?


Land Warfare Group Command Officers
1: Land Warfare Group Commander
2: Land Warfare Group Fire Coordination Officer
3: Land Warfare Group Communications Officer

ULDV-2 Core Crew
4: ULDV-2 Commander
5: ULDV-2 Gunner
6: ULDV-2 Primary Driver

Indirect-Fire Crew
7: Indirect Fire Coordinator
8: Mortar Turret 1 Gunner
9: Mortar Turret 2 Gunner

Sensor Operation Crew
10: Sensor Management Officer
11: Visual Sensor Operator 1
12: Visual Sensor Operator 2
13: FLIR Operator
14: LIDAR Operator
15: RADAR Operator
16: Visual/Thermal Sensor Mast Operator

Countermeasure Systems Crew
17: EW Systems Operator
18: APS Operator

Powertrain Crew
19: Drivetrain Management Officer/Backup Driver
20: Power Management Officer

Miscellaneous Crew
21: General Systems/Damage Control Officer
22: Mechanic

Hmm, that's only 22. Statblock amended.

QUOTE (Allanea @ Sep 3 2011, 09:30 AM)
Why are we not just deploying a pile of 400mm self-propelled guns instead?


This is like asking why you don't just deploy a bunch of mortars instead of a tank.

Also, they can't fire 5-meter-long rods of nuclear waste at hilariously high velocities.


--------------------
To the daring belongs the future...
Top
no endorse
Posted: Sep 4 2011, 04:29 AM


You have way too much time on your hands ...


Group: Moderators
Posts: 4,174
Member No.: 22
Joined: 11-April 07



Hi, I'm Commander Shepherd and the above is my favorite post on the board.



EDIT:
HAHAHAHA YOU STILL HAVE FEWER CREW THAN THE EPIC OMGWTFBBQ NO ENDORSE TANK


--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
QUOTE (IRC)
[22:39]Spizania: A chain is a unit of length; it measures 66 feet or 22 yards or 4 rods or 100 links[1] (20.1168m). <<< This is why Britian ruled the world
[22:39]Spizania: we created a system of measurements noone else could understand
Top
Allanea
Posted: Sep 4 2011, 06:53 AM


You have way too much time on your hands ...


Group: Moderators
Posts: 3,729
Member No.: 88
Joined: 27-May 07



Fine. Let us assume it all works.

What are we firing those mega-projectiles at?

Why are we not using a Pamir-type reactor?


--------------------
user posted imageuser posted image


"That's fucking epic!" ~~ Scandavian States, on my translations
" Fucking awesome. Do more." ~~Questers, on my translations
Top
RRoan
Posted: Sep 4 2011, 05:24 PM


38% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 776
Member No.: 674
Joined: 20-February 09



QUOTE (Allanea @ Sep 4 2011, 06:53 AM)
What are we firing those mega-projectiles at?

Other, similarly-sized tanks, of course.

QUOTE (Allanea @ Sep 4 2011, 06:53 AM)
Why are we not using a Pamir-type reactor?


Craptastic power density.


--------------------
To the daring belongs the future...
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Ground Warfare | Next Newest »
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Create a free forum in seconds.
Learn More · Sign-up for Free

Topic OptionsPages: (2) [1] 2 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1068 seconds | Archive