InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Create your own social network with a free forum.

Learn More · Register for Free
Welcome to Nsdraftroom. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


Pages: (5) [1] 2 3 ... Last » ( Go to first unread post )

 HE versus tanks, and general anti-tank
Samozaryadnyastan
Posted: Apr 25 2012, 08:55 PM


85% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,701
Member No.: 1,101
Joined: 13-April 11



I know that lots of people here say that sufficiently sized HE shells are highly effective against tanks, but how exactly? What is the intended effect that a large-calibre HE round does to a tank?


--------------------
One day, I will actually know what the fuck I'm talking about.

Samozniy Military Industries
Starting alliances and ending wars since 2011.

QUOTE (Falls @ Sep 10 2012, 05:14 PM)

QUOTE (Samozaryadnyastan @ Sep 10 2012, 03:24 PM)

What're those three ships tailing at the back?

a good general guess if you look closely is, grossly superior to foreign counter-parts.
Top
Rich and Corporations
Posted: Apr 25 2012, 10:01 PM


84% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,698
Member No.: 938
Joined: 19-July 10



1. Spalling.
2. Damage of exterior components, like sensors or optics or something.
3. other things I may not know about


--------------------
<@Number_Muncher>it can only be sigged if it's a lie. No true statement has ever been sigged[/QUOTE]

Praise for RnC
QUOTE (Danton @ Jul 19 2012, 02:51 AM)
RandC is right

QUOTE (Praetonia @ Aug 31 2012, 10:27 PM)
Take that, r&c.

QUOTE (no endorse)
Scratch that, this thread went /DOWNHILL/ after RnC stop posting in it


Now 100% efficient at fighting mod tyranny.
Top
Samozaryadnyastan
Posted: Apr 25 2012, 10:05 PM


85% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,701
Member No.: 1,101
Joined: 13-April 11



Wiki wasn't especially helpful. Just mentioned 'dynamic shockwaves' and such.
I doubt the ability of HE, even lots of it, to physically blast its way through armour (front glacis/turret face), but obviously it will cause severe damage to exterior components.
I recall seeing either here or in the tank thread something about the shockwave of large enough HE warheads being sufficient to kill the crew of an MCA-7, despite probably not penetrating - with regards to its heavy armour.


--------------------
One day, I will actually know what the fuck I'm talking about.

Samozniy Military Industries
Starting alliances and ending wars since 2011.

QUOTE (Falls @ Sep 10 2012, 05:14 PM)

QUOTE (Samozaryadnyastan @ Sep 10 2012, 03:24 PM)

What're those three ships tailing at the back?

a good general guess if you look closely is, grossly superior to foreign counter-parts.
Top
Forza
Posted: Apr 25 2012, 10:59 PM


36% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 724
Member No.: 1,006
Joined: 22-October 10



Possibly has something to do with the transfer of energy?


--------------------
Qui Patitur Vincit - Who perseveres, conquers.

You'll Never Walk Alone
Top
Samozaryadnyastan
Posted: Apr 25 2012, 11:17 PM


85% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,701
Member No.: 1,101
Joined: 13-April 11



Well, if you model the explosive of an M795 155mm shell as TNT and assume it all explodes and does so forwards, it throws 45MJ at whatever it's targeting. Less beneficial assumptions, you're probably looking at 30MJ.
Present-day tank guns typically get MEs of 10-12MJ, right?

Lol, that was a simple explanation.


--------------------
One day, I will actually know what the fuck I'm talking about.

Samozniy Military Industries
Starting alliances and ending wars since 2011.

QUOTE (Falls @ Sep 10 2012, 05:14 PM)

QUOTE (Samozaryadnyastan @ Sep 10 2012, 03:24 PM)

What're those three ships tailing at the back?

a good general guess if you look closely is, grossly superior to foreign counter-parts.
Top
Kyiv
Posted: Apr 26 2012, 01:17 AM


My tank is umbrella!


Group: Members
Posts: 2,903
Member No.: 401
Joined: 3-June 08



http://www.otvaga2004.narod.ru/publ_w5/010_art.htm

Even if you aren't :Allanea: you can still see these pictures of the effect of HE shells on tanks.

Basically two mechanisms of damage:
1. Fragments/overpressure destroy external components (Sights, the gun, the tracks etc.) This is the biggest threat.
2. Injure or kill the crew either by spallation (spall shields mostly take care of this) or the shock wave. This is a fairly unreliable mechanism.

It's also possible to cause catastrophic damage with a sufficiently large explosion.


--------------------
QUOTE
i think it is you that is the fool.My education was brought with money, not from wikipedia!


QUOTE (Rich and Corporations @ Apr 16 2012, 10:06 PM)
Oh my god, everyone is either wrong or fucking stupid.
Top
Samozaryadnyastan
Posted: Apr 26 2012, 01:22 AM


85% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,701
Member No.: 1,101
Joined: 13-April 11



A note, Chrome's built-in googlewank offers a more-than-passable translation of the article, for anyone using FF.


--------------------
One day, I will actually know what the fuck I'm talking about.

Samozniy Military Industries
Starting alliances and ending wars since 2011.

QUOTE (Falls @ Sep 10 2012, 05:14 PM)

QUOTE (Samozaryadnyastan @ Sep 10 2012, 03:24 PM)

What're those three ships tailing at the back?

a good general guess if you look closely is, grossly superior to foreign counter-parts.
Top
San-Silvacian
Posted: Apr 26 2012, 01:54 AM


25% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 505
Member No.: 1,243
Joined: 13-November 11



Why do Russians use such God-awfully large artillery guns?


--------------------
QUOTE (Mikedor)
5 medics per platoon? Overheal.

QUOTE (Falls @ Nov 25 2012, 08:59 AM)
If you believe that technology...or fuck it, specifically aircraft avionics did not under go revolutionary changes between Vietnam and the gulf war,  you should bottle your thought process and sell it as a cure for smart.
Top
Samozaryadnyastan
Posted: Apr 26 2012, 01:56 AM


85% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,701
Member No.: 1,101
Joined: 13-April 11



?

Russians use 152 and 203mm pieces, not sure if 122s still see service.
NATO uses 155 and the US probably still has some 203s of their own knocking about.


--------------------
One day, I will actually know what the fuck I'm talking about.

Samozniy Military Industries
Starting alliances and ending wars since 2011.

QUOTE (Falls @ Sep 10 2012, 05:14 PM)

QUOTE (Samozaryadnyastan @ Sep 10 2012, 03:24 PM)

What're those three ships tailing at the back?

a good general guess if you look closely is, grossly superior to foreign counter-parts.
Top
San-Silvacian
Posted: Apr 26 2012, 02:04 AM


25% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 505
Member No.: 1,243
Joined: 13-November 11



QUOTE (Samozaryadnyastan @ Apr 26 2012, 01:56 AM)
?

Russians use 152 and 203mm pieces, not sure if 122s still see service.
NATO uses 155 and the US probably still has some 203s of their own knocking about.

I'm not talking caliber, but just general size.


--------------------
QUOTE (Mikedor)
5 medics per platoon? Overheal.

QUOTE (Falls @ Nov 25 2012, 08:59 AM)
If you believe that technology...or fuck it, specifically aircraft avionics did not under go revolutionary changes between Vietnam and the gulf war,  you should bottle your thought process and sell it as a cure for smart.
Top
Kyiv
Posted: Apr 26 2012, 02:19 AM


My tank is umbrella!


Group: Members
Posts: 2,903
Member No.: 401
Joined: 3-June 08



You are hallucinating.



--------------------
QUOTE
i think it is you that is the fool.My education was brought with money, not from wikipedia!


QUOTE (Rich and Corporations @ Apr 16 2012, 10:06 PM)
Oh my god, everyone is either wrong or fucking stupid.
Top
Rich and Corporations
Posted: Apr 26 2012, 03:11 AM


84% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,698
Member No.: 938
Joined: 19-July 10



Maybe it is just the angle.


--------------------
<@Number_Muncher>it can only be sigged if it's a lie. No true statement has ever been sigged[/QUOTE]

Praise for RnC
QUOTE (Danton @ Jul 19 2012, 02:51 AM)
RandC is right

QUOTE (Praetonia @ Aug 31 2012, 10:27 PM)
Take that, r&c.

QUOTE (no endorse)
Scratch that, this thread went /DOWNHILL/ after RnC stop posting in it


Now 100% efficient at fighting mod tyranny.
Top
San-Silvacian
Posted: Apr 26 2012, 03:53 AM


25% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 505
Member No.: 1,243
Joined: 13-November 11



QUOTE (Kyiv @ Apr 26 2012, 02:19 AM)
You are hallucinating.

Maybe I'm just used to the tacticool look for the M777.


--------------------
QUOTE (Mikedor)
5 medics per platoon? Overheal.

QUOTE (Falls @ Nov 25 2012, 08:59 AM)
If you believe that technology...or fuck it, specifically aircraft avionics did not under go revolutionary changes between Vietnam and the gulf war,  you should bottle your thought process and sell it as a cure for smart.
Top
Epimachus
Posted: Apr 26 2012, 05:59 PM


7% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 154
Member No.: 1,201
Joined: 14-September 11





--------------------
bizarre sexual activities performed with squid, octopus and mud sharks
Top
Falls
Posted: Apr 26 2012, 09:48 PM


Swamp Thing


Group: Members
Posts: 5,678
Member No.: 108
Joined: 6-June 07



nice link
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Introductory Questions | Next Newest »
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Create a free forum in seconds.
Learn More · Register for Free

Topic OptionsPages: (5) [1] 2 3 ... Last »



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.0957 seconds | Archive