InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Enjoy forums? Start your own community for free.

Learn More · Sign-up for Free
Welcome to Nsdraftroom. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


Pages: (2) [1] 2  ( Go to first unread post )

 "Porsche" Green Tank
Rich and Corporations
Posted: Jul 29 2012, 08:21 AM


84% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,698
Member No.: 938
Joined: 19-July 10



Or green tanks that drive like a Porsche using Prius technology. This design is totally unfeasible, the Nazis had blueprints for several series hybrid tanks, but unlike their other Wunderwaffe, the hybrid tank has yet to be developed and fielded, not even for the foreseeable future. Having electric motors capable of propelling a tank at high speed would either be prohibitively heavy, unreliable, and/or expensive (the last being the least significant).

A modern battery could store .1 to .6 HPh per kilogram, or 100 to 600 HPh per tonne. Each tonne would roughly occupy a volume of one cubic meter.

The battery of a Prius weighs 80 kg and can power a 60 hp motor.
Scaling this up to a NS tank would yield a 40 times increase in mass. There will be significant negative returns to investment at this power, especially considering that the horsepower to speed relationship is that of a cuberoot formula.

Although the power demands of a tank are vastly, vastly, different. For one, they are much greater, with far more electronics, although the proportion of electric consumption per tonne compared between a modern tank and a car is probably less.


--------------------
<@Number_Muncher>it can only be sigged if it's a lie. No true statement has ever been sigged[/QUOTE]

Praise for RnC
QUOTE (Danton @ Jul 19 2012, 02:51 AM)
RandC is right

QUOTE (Praetonia @ Aug 31 2012, 10:27 PM)
Take that, r&c.

QUOTE (no endorse)
Scratch that, this thread went /DOWNHILL/ after RnC stop posting in it


Now 100% efficient at fighting mod tyranny.
Top
Kyiv
Posted: Jul 29 2012, 08:40 AM


My tank is umbrella!


Group: Members
Posts: 2,902
Member No.: 401
Joined: 3-June 08



WTF are you talking about.


--------------------
QUOTE
i think it is you that is the fool.My education was brought with money, not from wikipedia!


QUOTE (Rich and Corporations @ Apr 16 2012, 10:06 PM)
Oh my god, everyone is either wrong or fucking stupid.
Top
RRoan
Posted: Jul 29 2012, 09:50 AM


38% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 776
Member No.: 674
Joined: 20-February 09



:rich:


--------------------
To the daring belongs the future...
Top
Lamoni
Posted: Jul 29 2012, 10:52 AM


Most Consistent Desginer (2012)


Group: Admin
Posts: 3,678
Member No.: 336
Joined: 25-April 08



QUOTE (Kyiv @ Jul 28 2012, 11:40 PM)
WTF are you talking about.

He's probably trying to "address" a non-existent problem.


--------------------
QUOTE
Stevid: Well, you must be congratulated for creating an arsenal ship that hasn't been torn to shreds by the NSD Naval community. I've seen many arsenal ships go through here and been laughed at, but you've gone and designed one that everyone seems at least half okay with.  Well done.


QUOTE
Lyras: Competence-wise, an M-21 would comfortably be a match for the vast majority of NS-grade tanks.


QUOTE
Yanitaria: Compared to you, most designers look like they have ADD.


QUOTE
Ekraysia: I have to say, comparing your military equipment to that of the average NSer would be like comparing the T-34 to a hastily up-armoured elderly horse.


QUOTE
<Anemos> Sometimes I can't help but wonder if you're on a design team of some sort
Top
Samozaryadnyastan
Posted: Jul 29 2012, 11:43 AM


85% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,700
Member No.: 1,101
Joined: 13-April 11



You can have better power densities at larger motor sizes.
Forza's GreenTank probably isn't a bad basis for a hybrid powerplant design.


--------------------
One day, I will actually know what the fuck I'm talking about.

Samozniy Military Industries
Starting alliances and ending wars since 2011.

QUOTE (Falls @ Sep 10 2012, 05:14 PM)

QUOTE (Samozaryadnyastan @ Sep 10 2012, 03:24 PM)

What're those three ships tailing at the back?

a good general guess if you look closely is, grossly superior to foreign counter-parts.
Top
no endorse
Posted: Jul 29 2012, 07:28 PM


You have way too much time on your hands ...


Group: Moderators
Posts: 4,163
Member No.: 22
Joined: 11-April 07



if I'm reading it correctly, RnC is suggesting a hybrid electric tank. Problem I see being that I'm not convinced tanks have a variable enough power requirement for it to work.

Works great for cars, where you really only ever use a few tens of horsepower except when you're accelerating up to speed. But it's because average power demand is usually so much lower than peak power demand that it can work.



What's a tank powerplant's duty cycle? Anyone got an idea?


--------------------
user posted image
user posted image
QUOTE (IRC)
[22:39]Spizania: A chain is a unit of length; it measures 66 feet or 22 yards or 4 rods or 100 links[1] (20.1168m). <<< This is why Britian ruled the world
[22:39]Spizania: we created a system of measurements noone else could understand
Top
Samozaryadnyastan
Posted: Jul 29 2012, 07:34 PM


85% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,700
Member No.: 1,101
Joined: 13-April 11



all of teh powah?


--------------------
One day, I will actually know what the fuck I'm talking about.

Samozniy Military Industries
Starting alliances and ending wars since 2011.

QUOTE (Falls @ Sep 10 2012, 05:14 PM)

QUOTE (Samozaryadnyastan @ Sep 10 2012, 03:24 PM)

What're those three ships tailing at the back?

a good general guess if you look closely is, grossly superior to foreign counter-parts.
Top
Rich and Corporations
Posted: Jul 29 2012, 07:40 PM


84% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,698
Member No.: 938
Joined: 19-July 10



Given that most tanks now sport APUs implies that it is low, especially in defensive positions.

I'm actually including Forza's greentank design in my OP, which probably cannot be scaled up to a tank. I am not aware of any heavy trucks that use the Prius's synergy drive.


--------------------
<@Number_Muncher>it can only be sigged if it's a lie. No true statement has ever been sigged[/QUOTE]

Praise for RnC
QUOTE (Danton @ Jul 19 2012, 02:51 AM)
RandC is right

QUOTE (Praetonia @ Aug 31 2012, 10:27 PM)
Take that, r&c.

QUOTE (no endorse)
Scratch that, this thread went /DOWNHILL/ after RnC stop posting in it


Now 100% efficient at fighting mod tyranny.
Top
Danton
Posted: Jul 29 2012, 08:15 PM


Unregistered









user posted image
Top
Forza
Posted: Jul 30 2012, 01:26 AM


36% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 724
Member No.: 1,006
Joined: 22-October 10



QUOTE (no endorse @ Jul 29 2012, 07:28 PM)
if I'm reading it correctly, RnC is suggesting a hybrid electric tank. Problem I see being that I'm not convinced tanks have a variable enough power requirement for it to work.

Works great for cars, where you really only ever use a few tens of horsepower except when you're accelerating up to speed. But it's because average power demand is usually so much lower than peak power demand that it can work.



What's a tank powerplant's duty cycle? Anyone got an idea?

QUOTE
I'm actually including Forza's greentank design in my OP

No you are not, because you did not endeavor to ask me prior.

My hybrid engine design isn't voodoo or completely insane. It's a small diesel engine with a pair of small (for average tank outputs) electric motors which all combine together to produce a reasonable amount of power. In theory, it's basically just an 800kw tank with a little button that can double the power to give you acceleration lulz when you need it. The upside is also that when the tank is stopped, the engine can be turned off giving you a stop-start function. And if you need to, the tank can crawl for a bit under electric power. It's far more Honda CR-Z than Prius. And yes, it is big and heavy.

Oh, R&C. Electric motors have been powering big, heavy things at fast speeds for years.


--------------------
Qui Patitur Vincit - Who perseveres, conquers.

You'll Never Walk Alone
Top
Rich and Corporations
Posted: Jul 30 2012, 01:59 AM


84% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,698
Member No.: 938
Joined: 19-July 10



I see. So your tanks are in fact maglevs.

Some of your users claim 34.6 HP/t with a 1808 kw Forza engine.

QUOTE
The transmission contains a planetary gear set that adjusts and blends the amount of torque from the engine and motors as it’s needed. Special couplings and sensors monitor rotation speed of each track and the total torque on the tracks, for feedback to the control computer.


--------------------
<@Number_Muncher>it can only be sigged if it's a lie. No true statement has ever been sigged[/QUOTE]

Praise for RnC
QUOTE (Danton @ Jul 19 2012, 02:51 AM)
RandC is right

QUOTE (Praetonia @ Aug 31 2012, 10:27 PM)
Take that, r&c.

QUOTE (no endorse)
Scratch that, this thread went /DOWNHILL/ after RnC stop posting in it


Now 100% efficient at fighting mod tyranny.
Top
Forza
Posted: Jul 30 2012, 02:17 AM


36% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 724
Member No.: 1,006
Joined: 22-October 10



QUOTE (Rich and Corporations @ Jul 30 2012, 01:59 AM)
I see. So your tanks are in fact maglevs.

Some of your users claim 34.6 HP/t with a 1808 kw Forza engine.

QUOTE
The transmission contains a planetary gear set that adjusts and blends the amount of torque from the engine and motors as it’s needed. Special couplings and sensors monitor rotation speed of each track and the total torque on the tracks, for feedback to the control computer.

The Fastech 360 is not a maglev.

Which is correct as the combined output of the engine can be up to 1808kw.

problem?

Lastly, I'm going to point out that hybrid versions of pickups to buses to military trucks are being tested and/or sold right now. Even the Shinkansen is being fitted with a battery pack for a kinetic energy recovery system. You'd better write to all these people R&C, tell them that batteries are inefficient at these sizes and tell them that electric motors can't make things go fast.


--------------------
Qui Patitur Vincit - Who perseveres, conquers.

You'll Never Walk Alone
Top
Rich and Corporations
Posted: Jul 30 2012, 02:33 AM


84% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 1,698
Member No.: 938
Joined: 19-July 10



Nah.

I mean all these terrible things are being done in your name anyway.

Not mine.

You also forgot that those accelerations/discharge rates are unfeasible.


--------------------
<@Number_Muncher>it can only be sigged if it's a lie. No true statement has ever been sigged[/QUOTE]

Praise for RnC
QUOTE (Danton @ Jul 19 2012, 02:51 AM)
RandC is right

QUOTE (Praetonia @ Aug 31 2012, 10:27 PM)
Take that, r&c.

QUOTE (no endorse)
Scratch that, this thread went /DOWNHILL/ after RnC stop posting in it


Now 100% efficient at fighting mod tyranny.
Top
Lamoni
Posted: Jul 30 2012, 02:37 AM


Most Consistent Desginer (2012)


Group: Admin
Posts: 3,678
Member No.: 336
Joined: 25-April 08



QUOTE (Rich and Corporations @ Jul 29 2012, 05:33 PM)
Nah.

I mean all these terrible things are being done in your name anyway.

Not mine.

You also forgot that those accelerations/discharge rates are unfeasible.

They are entirely feasible, R&C. You're forgetting that people like Sumer and USPA (who have first hand experiences with engines) have also reviewed Forza's design and found it both workable, and dependable.

If a hybrid set-up can power a train, then it can easily power a tank.


--------------------
QUOTE
Stevid: Well, you must be congratulated for creating an arsenal ship that hasn't been torn to shreds by the NSD Naval community. I've seen many arsenal ships go through here and been laughed at, but you've gone and designed one that everyone seems at least half okay with.  Well done.


QUOTE
Lyras: Competence-wise, an M-21 would comfortably be a match for the vast majority of NS-grade tanks.


QUOTE
Yanitaria: Compared to you, most designers look like they have ADD.


QUOTE
Ekraysia: I have to say, comparing your military equipment to that of the average NSer would be like comparing the T-34 to a hastily up-armoured elderly horse.


QUOTE
<Anemos> Sometimes I can't help but wonder if you're on a design team of some sort
Top
Forza
Posted: Jul 30 2012, 03:22 AM


36% Armaments Designer


Group: Members
Posts: 724
Member No.: 1,006
Joined: 22-October 10



QUOTE (Rich and Corporations @ Jul 30 2012, 02:33 AM)
Nah.

I mean all these terrible things are being done in your name anyway.

Not mine.

You also forgot that those accelerations/discharge rates are unfeasible.

P. much what Lamoni said. There is no point arguing science and reality with you as I have learned from these boards.

Besides if you think I have a crap design, I'm glad. I'd be more worried if you thought it was clever.

"Tanks that drive like a Porsche" lolwut?


--------------------
Qui Patitur Vincit - Who perseveres, conquers.

You'll Never Walk Alone
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Argument & Debate | Next Newest »
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
InvisionFree gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community.
Learn More · Register Now

Topic OptionsPages: (2) [1] 2 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.0987 seconds | Archive