| · Forum Posting Rules · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Andrew |
|
||
|
Chief of Staff Group: Admin Posts: 9,017 Member No.: 1 Joined: 17-November 04 |
|
||
| _Z_ |
Posted: Jul 22 2005, 01:43 AM
|
|
O-4 Major Group: Founders Posts: 2,306 Member No.: 2 Joined: 18-November 04 |
That's nuts. If Lee wants to work for another company, that's his right. If M$ had their way, they'd probably execute former employees to keep their secrets safe. But you just can't do that. And they're not the 'outfit' (CIA), so you're not in 'for life'. If that were the case, a person could only have 1 job if they worked at M$, after that, they'd have to be on unemployment or welfare. Either that, or start a new career.
Maybe these crazy confidentiality dictates are why M$ isn't hanging on to their employess- hmmm? ![]() |
| Ducc |
Posted: Jul 22 2005, 06:42 PM
|
|
O-4 Major Group: Founders Posts: 2,453 Member No.: 4 Joined: 18-November 04 |
I thought it was common for companies to require employees to sign a contract that says they won't work for a competitor for X years after leaving. No?
|
| Andrew |
Posted: Jul 22 2005, 11:41 PM
|
|
Chief of Staff Group: Admin Posts: 9,017 Member No.: 1 Joined: 17-November 04 |
Ducc, I don't think that it legal. They can make them sign confidentiality agreements that prevents them from taking company secrets from one job to the next but lets be realistic how are you really going to enforce that unless the other company comes right out with an identical product that violates patent law.
I'm sure lawyers have come up with all sorts of ridiculous contracts trying to control this sort of thing but I don't believe it is realistic to expect it to be upheld in court. |
| _Z_ |
Posted: Jul 23 2005, 08:46 AM
|
|
O-4 Major Group: Founders Posts: 2,306 Member No.: 2 Joined: 18-November 04 |
However I think they can enforce confidentiality agreements as to other employ while the employee is engaged at that company (i.e.- moonlighting).
As far as I know, only the classified data and processes are legally supported under the confidentiality agreement clause, unless there's matters of national security or government safeguard involved. Then it gets more sticky... |
| Andrew |
|
||
|
Chief of Staff Group: Admin Posts: 9,017 Member No.: 1 Joined: 17-November 04 |
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |