The IPCC consensus on climate change was phoney
Andrew
  Posted: Jun 15 2010, 02:05 PM


Chief of Staff


Group: Admin
Posts: 9,017
Member No.: 1
Joined: 17-November 04



QUOTE
Claims such as ‘2,500 of the world’s leading scientists have reached a consensus that human activities are having a significant influence on the climate’ are disingenuous. That particular consensus judgement, as are many others in the IPCC reports, is reached by only a few dozen experts.
Top
Karl
Posted: Jun 15 2010, 07:39 PM


O-1 2nd Lieutenant


Group: Special Forces
Posts: 967
Member No.: 148
Joined: 14-July 06




The consensus-bangers are sweating now. The myths of global warming catastrophe are being punctured one by one.

QUOTE
...as Yearley (2009) explains, IPCC consensus-making is an exercise in collective judgement about subjective (or Bayesian) likelihoods in areas of uncertain knowledge.


That's beautifully precise. If you want the bullet-point version, how about this: a consensus is subjective. Also, this "consensus" went way beyond subjective... it was exaggerated, artificial, oversimplified, and misleading. Like the article said... phoney.

QUOTE
Consensus-making in the IPCC has been largely driven by the desire to communicate climate science coherently to a wide spectrum of policy users – ‘to construct knowledge’ (Weingart, 1999) - but in so doing communicating uncertainties have been down-played (van der Sluijs, 1998).


I think it would be more accurate to say: "Consensus-making in the IPCC has largely been driven by the desire OF A FEW PEOPLE to communicate THEIR OPINION of climate science aggressively to a wide spectrum of politicians and journalists--'to distort knowledge'."

innocent.gif

Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | The Sciences | Next Newest »

Topic Options



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Archive