| QUOTE |
| On pg 6 of the above article he quotes Barry Goldwater from his book "With no Apologies" who said: As one gets deeper into this scenario, Drucker’s emphasis on the non-profit sector should come as no surprise—especially if one understands what Barry Goldwater understood. In his book, "With No Apologies", Senator Goldwater described the strategy of the Trilateral Commission, Council for Foreign Relations, and other globalist entities as an attempt to control the “Four Corners of Power” in order to transition the world into their perceived planetary model. He described these “four corners” as political, economic, theological, and intellectual; and contended that those who control the Four Corners of Power control the world. (17) Drucker’s “3-Legged Stool” simply combines the theological and intellectual corners of power into the “private sector/ non-profit” leg of the stool. Goldwater theorized that control of the Four Corners of Power would result in a new world system, just as Drucker’s model to achieve “community” will bring forth a new society. However, the fact is that the non-profit sector --and the Evangelical Church in particular, posed the greatest threat to achieving the synthesis of “community”--or at least it did-- [u]until Hybels (Willow Creek), Buford, Warren (Purpose Driven Life), and Co. began to transition their constituents by the hundreds of thousands to a position that aligned with the whole systems model. |
| QUOTE |
| I believe the Council on Foreign Relations and its ancillary elitist groups are indifferent to communism. They have no ideological anchors. In their pursuit of a new world order they are prepared to deal without prejudice with a communist state, a socialist state, a democratic state, monarchy, oligarchy it's all the same to them. (Have you noticed they are calling Al Qaeda the good guys in the overthrow of Egypt and Libya? Do you remember they were the bad guys after 911? Seems like the quote above is accurate about the elite) Rear Admiral Chester Wardm USN (Ret) who as a member of the CFR for 16 years, has written: "The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common - they want to bring the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States. ... To my mind, this would inevitably be accompanied by a loss in personal freedom of choice and the reestablishment of the restraints which provoked the American Revolution. ... Where I differ from the governor is in the suggestion implicit throughout the lectures (speaking of Nelson Rockefeller) that to achieve this new federalism, the United States must submerge its national identity and surrender substantial matters of sovereignty to a new political order. ... (Speaking of the Trilateral Commission he says) It is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. |
