The Great Deception -> ** Declaration At Rio 1992 Un Millennium

** Declaration At Rio 1992 Un Millennium - Global, Governance - Communitarianism - Obama ok

Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic

jofortruth	Posted: Feb 22 2008, 02:56 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,430 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	http://discerningtoday.org/un_millennium_declaration.htm NOTICE BILL CLINTON FRONT AND CENTER IN THE PICTURE NEAR KOFI ANNAN. OH YES! HE'S A MAJOR PLAYER IN THE NWO. IN FACT, HE HELPED THEM ALONG BY PASSING NAFTA, CREATING THE PRESIDENT'S COUNCIL ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, AND SO MUCH MORE! Also, this is bi-partisan as GHW Bush signed the Rio Earth Summit accord in 1992! Another example of how the two-party system is really one working not for the people, but the globalists who own them! United Nations Millennium Declaration: http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.htm This is what YOUR PRESIDENT - BILL CLINTON - AGREED TO IN 2000 AND IS STILL WORKING HARD BEHIND THE SCENES TO MAKE SURE IT BECOMES REALITY. Of course, he's not the only President or elected official who is doing this. Both BUSH'S and many of our Congressmen think they have the right to DECIDE OUR FUTURE, WITHOUT OUR INPUT. THEY DON'T ASK US WHAT THEY SHOULD DO (THEY USE TO WORK FOR US); THEY NOW TELL US WHAT THEY'VE DONE (PAST TENSE)!

jofortruth	Posted: Feb 22 2008, 03:27 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,430 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Have you ever asked yourself the following: If the world can come together on something like this UN Millennium Declaration for a New World Order, then why is there a PEACE PROBLEM AT ALL? Yet they say THERE WILL NEVER BE PEACE IF WE DON'T FORM THIS NWO. A little contradictory don't you think? AND VERY SELF-SERVING! YOU SEE, THE PEACE PROBLEM WAS STARTED BY THESE SAME PEOPLE, THE ELITE ACROSS THE WORLD, WHO HAVE FOMENTED WARS AND PLUNDERED THE NATURAL RESOURCES OF OTHER COUNTRIES FOR GENERATIONS. WHY? SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY COULD! SINCE THEY HAVE CREATED ALL THIS CHAOS, THEY NOW OFFER THE WORLD A SOLUTION, OR WHAT I CALL "THE BIG FIX". THIS IS YET ANOTHER WAY THEY CAN GET CLOSER TO THEIR REAL GOAL OF WORLD DOMINATION - WHERE THEY RULE. YOU SEE! THE WEALTHY ELITE AND THE POWERFUL ARE NEVER CONTENT UNTIL THEY HAVE IT ALL, AND THEY ARE ON THE VERGE OF GETTING JUST THAT BECAUSE WE THE PEOPLE HAVE NOT HELD THEM ACCOUNTABLE! THIS IS WHAT THE NWO IS ABOUT. NOTHING MORE!

jofortruth

Posted: Jan 24 2009, 10:49 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

Barack Obama and the UN's Drive for Global Governance:
http://www.americanpolicy.org/un/obama.htm

QUOTE

July 15, 2008

By Tom DeWeese

Senator Barack Obama has introduced a dangerous bill and it�s on the fast track to Senate passage, probably because of his high profile position as the expected Democrat presidential nominee. Obama hasn�t done much legislatively in his freshman Senate term, but this one is very telling about what we can expect from a President Obama.

The bill is the �Global Poverty Act� (S.2433) and is not just a compassionate bit of fluff that Obama dreamed up to help the poor of the world. This bill is directly tied to the United Nations and serves as little more than a shakedown of American taxpayers in a massive wealth redistribution scheme. In fact, if passed, The Global Poverty Act will provide the United Nations with 0.7% of the United States gross national product. Estimates are that it will add up to at least $845 billion of taxpayer money for welfare to third world countries, in addition to the $300 billion Americans spent for the same thing in 2006.�

The situation is urgent because the Global Poverty Act has already passed the House of Representatives by a unanimous voice vote on September 25, 2007. The senate version has been passed out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee by unanimous consent and ready for a full Senate vote.

Of course the United States has had an ongoing program of supplying foreign aid and assistance to the poor for decades. And the U.S. pays most of the bills at the UN for its herd of programs. So what�s new about Obama�s bill, and why is it dangerous?

Some history that led up to the Global Poverty Act. In 1999 and 2000 non-governmental organizations, NGOs held numerous meetings around the world to write what became known as the Charter for Global Democracy. The document was prepared to be a blueprint for achieving global governance. In reality it was a charter for the abolition of individual freedom, national sovereignty and limited government.

The Charter for Global Democracy outlined its goals in 12 detailed �principles:�

� Principle One called for the consolidation of all international agencies under the direct authority of the UN.

� Principle Two called for UN regulation of all transnational corporations and financial institutions, requiring an �international code of conduct� concerning the environment and labor standards.

� Principle Three explored various schemes to create independent revenue sources for the UN � meaning UN taxes including fees on all international monetary transactions, taxes on aircraft flights in the skies, and on shipping fuels, and licensing of what the UN called the �global commons,� meaning use of air, water and natural resources. The Law of the Sea Treaty fits this category.�

� Principle Four would restructure the UN by eliminating the veto power and permanent member status on the Security Council. Such a move would almost completely eliminate U.S. influence and power in the world body.� In turn Principle Four called for the creation of an �Assembly of the People� which would be populated by hand-picked non-governmental organizations (NGOs) which are nothing more than political groups with their own agendas (the UN calls NGOs �civil society�).� Now, the UN says these NGO�s will be the representatives of the �people� and the Assembly of the People will become the new power of the UN.

� Principle Five would authorize a standing UN army.

� Principle six would require UN registration of all arms and the reduction of all national armies �as part of a multinational global security system� under the authority of the UN.

� Principle Seven would require individual and national compliance with all UN �Human rights� treaties and declarations.

� Principle Eight would activate the UN Criminal Court and make it compulsory for all nations -- now achieved.

� Principle Nine called for a new institution to establish economic and environmental security by ensuring �Sustainable Development.�

� Principle Ten would establish an International Environmental Cort

� Principle Eleven demanded an international declaration stating that climate change is an essential global security interest that requires the creation of a �high level action team� to allocate carbon emissions based on equal per-capita rights -- The Kyoto Global Warming Treaty in action.� �

� Principle Twelve demanded the cancellation of all debt owed by the poorest nations, global poverty reductions and for the �equitable sharing� of global resources, as allocated by the UN -- here is where Obama�s Global Poverty Act comes in.

Specifically, the Charter for Global Democracy was intended to give the UN domain over all of the earth�s land, air and seas. In addition it would give the UN the power to control all natural resources, wild life, and energy sources, even radio waves. Such control would allow the UN to place taxes on everything from development; to fishing; to air travel; to shipping. Anything that could be defined as using the earth�s resources would be subject to UN use-taxes. Coincidentally, all twelve principles came directly from the UN�s Commission on Global Governance.

There was one major problem with the Charter for Global Democracy, at least as far as the UN was concerned. It was too honest and straightforward. Overt action displeases the high-order thinking skills of UN diplomats. The UN likes to keep things fuzzy and gray so as not to scare off the natives. That way there is less chance of screaming headlines of a pending takeover by the UN. So, by the time the UN�s Millennium Summit rolled around in September 2000, things weren�t quite so clear.

At the Summit, attended by literally every head of state and world leader, including then-president Bill Clinton, the name of the Charter had been changed to the Millennium Declaration and the language had been toned down to sound more like suggestions and ideas. Then those �suggestions� were put together in the �Millennium Declaration� in the name of all of the heads of state. No vote or debate was allowed -- just acclamation by world leaders who basically said nothing. And the deed was done. The UN had its marching orders for the new Millennium.

Now the principles were called �Millennium Goals,� and there were eight instead of twelve. Goal 1: Eradicate Extreme Hunger and Poverty; Goal 2: Achieve Universal Primary Education; Goal 3: Promote Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women; Goal� 4: Reduce Child Mortality; Goal 5: Improve Maternal Health; Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, Malaria and other diseases; Goal 7: Ensure Environmental Sustainability; Goal 8: Develop a Global Partnership for Development.� � ��

Yes, these are sneaky guys, well trained in the art of saying nothing. Who could opposes such noble goals? The Millennium Project, which was set up to achieve the �goals� says on its website that it intends to �end poverty by 2015.� A noble goal, indeed. So what happened to the 12 Charter principles? Take a hard look � they are all still there.

Principles One, Two, and Twelve are right there in Goal 8 � to develop a global partnership for development. Now almost every world organization such as the World Bank carries a section on their web sites calling for �Millennium Development Goals� which control international banking and loan policy. They set policy goals for each country and sometimes communities to measure if nations are keeping their promise to implement the Millennium goals.�

Principle Seven is clearly Goal 3, the only way to assure Gender Equality is to enforce compliance with UN Human Rights treaties. Principle Eight has already been achieved.� Principle Nine is Goal 7. Al Gore is doing his best to enforce Principle Eleven. Global Warming, no matter how well the theory is debunked, just won�t go away because it is one of the Millennium Goals.

And then there is Barack Obama�s Global Poverty Act. Can you see which Principle that is? Of course, Principle 12 and Goal 1. Obama�s bill specifically mentions the Millennium Goals as its guide and the 0.7% of GNP is right out of UN documents. In order to eradicate poverty by 2015, they say, every industrial nation must pony up 0.7% of their GNP to the UN for use in eradicating poverty.

The UN is now becoming an international collection agency, pressing to collect the promises the world leaders made at the Millennium Summit. The UN wants the cash. In 2005 former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan said, �Developed countries that have not already done so should establish timetables to achieve the 0.7% target of gross national income for official development assistance by no later than 2015��

At the Summit in 2000, the UN set clear goals to establish its power over sovereign nations and to enforce the greatest redistribution of wealth scheme ever perpetrated on the world. Now it has the Criminal Court; Sustainable Development is fast becoming official policy in every corner of the nation�only today we call it �going green;� and there is a full court press on to enforce Global Warming policy, in spite of the fact that there is now much evidence surfacing to debunk the theory.

Clearly, Obama�s bill has been introduced to assure the United States falls in line with the Millennium Declaration and all that it stands for. After all, the UN needs the money to pay for its new found power. Truth, science and American taxpayer interests be hanged. Barack Obama wants to be a �world� leader.� ��

jofortruth	Posted: May 6 2009, 01:27 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,430 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Other things happening which are eroding Sovereignty of Nations and the individual and moving us into collectivism through this UN Declaration and other actions being taken: http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...topic=6615&st=0 What is Collectivism? http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...?showtopic=3662

jofortruth

Posted: May 6 2009, 01:36 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/5803595/Join-t...uiet-Revolution

QUOTE

See pg 5 at bottom of page

COPS, like every other program coming down via the UN Declaration at Rio, is based on the theory of communitarianism. Promoted as the sensible solution to the conflicts posed by too many individual rights and not enough community rights, Communitarians insist there must be a new effort to "shore up the moral, social and political environment." They "balance" the rights of individuals against the health and safety of the community at large.

They make it sound noble, but this is COLLECTIVISM and you will lose your rights, and they will attack the US CONSTITUTION (which they're doing now) because both can't exist together. No other country has a CONSTITUTION like America, so giving up their rights is easy. NOT SO IN AMERICA!

jofortruth

Posted: Mar 24 2010, 03:48 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

"Emerging Markets Reduce Their Debt and Claim Independence":
http://www.mediafire.com/?0zdtw0ngmjf

QUOTE

See pg 12: Conclusion

The importance of debt reduction amongst a number of middle income countries is two-fold:

� First, it provides some reduction in the annual flow of resources from relatively poor to relatively rich countries, as debt service costs fall. These funds can instead be diverted to poverty reduction schemes as countries pursue the Millenium Development Goals.

Is this the same thing?

http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...topic=8145&st=0

jofortruth

Posted: Jun 6 2012, 01:23 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

Guest Karen Schoen, talks about the Rio Meeting this month on The Power Hour (End of 3rd hour 6-6-12 - She also talks in Hr 2):
http://www.gcnlive.com/programs/powerHour/archives.php
http://ppjg.me/2012/05/31/reject-the-law-o...ea-treaty-lost/
http://www.agenda21today.com

QUOTE

Rio Up to No Good again - June 2012 meeting - They will be promoting more aggregious treaties such as:

1) Law of the Sea treaty

2) International Covenant on Environmental development

3) Small Arms Treaty (to steal the handguns of Americans)

4) Rights of the Child (Hillary the goon is pushing this one whereby your child can take complaint to the UN against you the parent)

5) Code of Conduct in Outer Space

I'M SURE THERE IS MUCH MORE NONSENSE THIS RIO BODY WILL COME OUT WITH. IT'S WHAT THEY DO! DISGUSTING!

1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

« Next Oldest | United Nations / Agenda 21 / ICLEI / Redevelopment Agencies / Land Use / Planning Commissions | Next Newest »

DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you