The Great Deception -> * Wtc History & Destruction Of The Towers

* Wtc History & Destruction Of The Towers

Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic

jofortruth

Posted: May 10 2011, 11:38 AM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,444
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

VIDEO: Building the World Trade Center:
http://vids.rationalveracity.com/videos/58...ld-trade-center

WTC Specs:
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/m...plan/index.html

Detailed Story of Planning Process:
http://www.GreatBuildings.com/buildings/Wo...er_History.html

The Architecture:
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/index.html

Designer - Minoru Yamasaki Associates:
http://www.GreatBuildings.com/buildings/Wo...ade_Center.html

Structural Engineers - Leslie E. Robertson Associates:
http://www.lera.com/projects/hir/wtc.htm

QUOTE

Structural System
��
1 and 2 World Trade Center used the so-called tube within a tube architecture, in which closely-spaced external columns form the building's perimeter walls, and a dense bundle of columns forms its core. Tall buildings have to resist primarily two kinds of forces: lateral loading (horizontal force) due mainly to the wind, and gravity loading (downward force) due to the building's weight. The tube within a tube design uses a specially reinforced perimeter wall to resist all lateral loading and some of the gravity loading, and a heavily reinforced central core to resist the bulk of the gravity loading. The floors and hat truss completed the structure, spanning the ring of space between the perimeter wall and the core, and transmitting lateral forces between those structures.

The tube within a tube architecture was relatively new at the time the Twin Towers were built, but has since been widely employed in the design of new skyscrapers. In fact most of the world's tallest buildings use it, including:

The Sears Tower (1450 ft)
The World Trade Center Towers (1350 ft)
The Standard Oil of Indiana Building (1125 ft)
The John Hancock Center (1105 ft)

jofortruth	Posted: May 10 2011, 11:59 AM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,444 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Evidence: The Destruction of the World Trade Center: http://stj911.org/evidence/wtc.html#enr

jofortruth	Posted: May 15 2011, 11:08 AM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,444 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Records of the Downtown-Lower Manhatten Association (DLMA): http://www.rockarch.org/collections/rockorgs/dlma.pdf

jofortruth

Posted: May 15 2011, 11:10 AM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,444
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

The Death of New York's Radio Row: (The first victims of the WTC)
http://www.qcwa.org/radio-row.htm

Radio Row was the neighborhood and business area that was destroyed by the Rockefellers, and their business buddies, to build their WTC complex. (Nelson Rockefeller was Gov of NY at the time, btw).

QUOTE

Renaming the commuter rail line the Port Authority Trans-Hudson, or PATH, the Port Authority rerouted one of its tubes into the site of the new center. That action created the "public purpose" that justified the eminent domain proceedings against the businesses and residents that stood on the 564-acre site.

jofortruth

Posted: May 15 2011, 11:13 AM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,444
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

The Pre-Planned Demolition of the WTC:
http://www.911truther.com/2011/03/05/the-p...tion-of-the-wtc

QUOTE

They were white elephants waiting for replacement. The entire WTC complex, including Building 7, had become, prematurely expendable and a candidate for demolition and replacement. Consider that the WTC had already paid for itself, had yielded profit to its Rockefeller and other investors, and had profited various banks and landlords, public and private, over and over during its life. Also consider the pressure on that prime location by insatiable New York developers eager to raze anything in sight on any pretext and to build downtown the latest gleaming office structures for the corporations and new luxury condos for the booming yuppie class.

A WTC demolition planned in '80's

A demolition was actually planned out in detail for the twin towers in the 1980's. The planners engaged architects who developed estimates for a complete take-down and rebuild and drafted conceptual drawings. The prominent firm of Emory Roth then took over as project architects and occupied a tower office.

The demolition of such gigantic steel structures, with their thick concrete floors, if lawfully performed in conformance with New York City codes, would have been an immensely arduous and expensive task and was estimated back then at $5.6 billion. The costs included the slow and laborious task of cutting, with oxy-acetylene torches, the giant hardened steel members of the high-rise structures.

Wow, thank god Bin Laden (the scapegoat boogeyman who btw claimed he didn't do it) was around to help them avoid the expense of doing it the LAWFUL WAY! What a joke!

Folks, the WTC towers had a "demolition schema" when they were built. It was required by the NY Building Codes at the time. (See the building code proof earlier in this thread) They had done their time and were now losing money and full of asbestos which would have cost too much to remove. Very suspicious!

60s Demolitions:
http://wirednewyork.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-7009.html

jofortruth	Posted: May 7 2012, 10:46 AM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,444 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?to...5995#msg1355995

jofortruth	Posted: May 10 2012, 12:35 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,444 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Divided We Stand (A book on the construction of the WTC and the Rockefeller connection): http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...0#entry22001682

1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

« Next Oldest | 911 - The Biggest Lie Ever Told | Next Newest »

DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you