Create a free forum in seconds.
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Welcome to The Great Deception. We hope you enjoy your visit.
You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


 

 * 5th Theory - Dr Judy Wood & Prof Morgan Reynolds, DEW Star Wars Technology Used
jofortruth
Posted: May 12 2011, 03:15 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,446
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



This theory proposes that a secret military weapon - A DEW (Directed Energy Weapon) was used to bring the THREE TOWERS down WTC 1, WTC 2 & WTC 7!
http://drjudywood.com/
http://drjudywood.com/articles/a/bio/Wood_Bio.html
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/erin6.html

Where Did the Towers Go? The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11
http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/

Preview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcLqdwr1Dsw...player_embedded

I think this theory has opened up the idea that some unconventional weapon was used to bring the towers down. I do believe there are weapon systems that have been hidden from us and are being used in the military!

Somebody with some integrity in the military needs to get the courage to expose these systems. There are many books and papers, etc written about them, as well as Congressional reports showing weapons like these do exist! But were they used on 911, is the question!

I applaud them for bringing a law suit, but was it done in a way they could win, or done more to alert the the public that the "official story" is a fable? I think the latter! Because even some of the 911 Commisioners admitted later "the Commission was set up to fail."
Top
jofortruth
Posted: May 14 2011, 01:42 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,446
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Lawsuit they brought against officials was dismissed - The Document:
http://tinyurl.com/632txeg

See page 48 Dimitri's opinion on this theory and court case:
http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/dro..._11chapters.pdf
Top
jofortruth
Posted: May 14 2011, 02:13 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,446
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



QUOTE
"From the merely technical point of view this bizarre notion could be disproved as follows. Firstly, nobody could explain why such an alleged “laser beam” that was allegedly used to pulverize the Twin Towers was not able to pulverize them completely – why it actually left the Towers' tops intact? If the alleged laser beams were really from space (i.e. from the above), why then it was not the other way around? It seems that according to this logic the Towers' tops supposed to be pulverized first, if their destruction started from top down. Secondly, this theory even if it struggles to explain the Towers' pulverizations, completely fails to explain high temperatures, underground cavities, filled with molten rock at a depth of nearly 100 meters below the earth's surface.

Secondly, this theory even if it struggles to explain the Towers' pulverizations, completely fails to explain high temperatures, underground cavities, filled with molten rock at a depth of nearly 100 meters below the earth's surface."

...


"To achieve the alleged functionality of the Twin Towers' pulverization the power of such “beams” must have been so high that probably the entire American Electrical system would never be able to supply that amount of the energy to any alleged giant “laser” or “maser” at a time. Perhaps only a thermo-nuclear explosion of over a hundred kiloton in TNT yield could theoretically supply the required amount of the energy to such a hypothetical giant “laser”. But if you go as far as to accept that such a thermo-nuclear charge of over hundred kiloton could have been used to supply the required energy to the alleged giant “laser”, then you are ready to accept that such a nuclear charge could have been used!"
Top
jofortruth
Posted: May 16 2011, 10:59 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,446
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



SEE THEORY #3 DIMITRI, IN THIS THREAD, FOR SOMETHING DR. JUDY WOOD APPEARS TO BE WRONG ABOUT.
Top
jofortruth
Posted: May 18 2011, 06:40 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,446
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Ventura doesn't buy The Bin Laden Hoax 3/3 (Listen at TIME 4:08 where Ventura says he believes the Dr. Judy Wood version of 911 - May 10, 2011)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79v3f9poBos&feature=related

Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | 911 - The Biggest Lie Ever Told | Next Newest »
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you

Topic Options



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.0664 seconds | Archive