Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Welcome to The Great Deception. We hope you enjoy your visit.
You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


Pages: (2) [1] 2  ( Go to first unread post )

 Fair Tax Act Of 2007– Hr 25/ S 102 - Not So Fast, Is this to conform to the WTO? Or legit?
jofortruth
Posted: Jun 12 2007, 09:58 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jun 13 2007, 11:18 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Ron Paul's Comments on the Fair Tax:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul347.html

QUOTE
"A pure consumption tax like the Fair Tax would be better than the current system ONLY IF we truly did away with the income tax by repealing the 16th amendment. Otherwise, we could end up with both the income tax and a national sales tax."




(Also, repealing the 16 Amendment requires a Constitutional amendment, and that requires it being sent to the states for approval by 3/4ths of them. Are we to believe they would do this AFTER passing this Fair Tax?)
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jun 13 2007, 11:34 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Authors of the book talking about the FAIR TAX. (Note that FOX and HANNITY support this).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=di2em2S25qM



Neal Boortz on his Radio Show:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyZSdkAmzh0



AND THIS GUY IS ONE OF THE PEOPLE PROMOTING THE FAIR TAX, ???? rolleyes.gif
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jun 13 2007, 11:42 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Another Example of BOORTZ. (His own assistant said he is a 16 yr old in a 62 year old body) rolleyes.gif

(Sorry but I would prefer a REASONABLE ADULT making changes to my TAX SYSTEM, MY FUTURE). Is he only involved in this because he has a radio show that can be used to promote the fair tax?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGFVCgI15_Y




(DO YOU QUESTION WHY SOMEONE LIKE THIS IS INVOLVED WITH CHANGING SOMETHING IN AMERICA THAT IS AS HUGE AS OUR TAX STRUCTURE?)
Top
jofortruth
  Posted: Dec 1 2007, 12:11 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



QUOTE
Pg 4 of the Fair Tax Summary says:

This section amends the Internal Revenue Code by creating a new "Subtitle A - Sales Tax".


QUESTION: Does this mean that the Internal Revenue Code will remain in existence even after repealing the Income Tax and changing to a Fair tax? I think this is a recipe for trouble.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Main Website:
http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer

The Founders of Americans for Fair Taxation AFT):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_For_Fair_Taxation
http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer?pagename=about_us

"AFFT was founded in 1994 by three Houston businessmen: Jack Trotter, Bob McNair, and Leo Linbeck ..."

Note: This is the same year that NAFTA passed. Is there a connection?

Fair Tax Proposal to Presidents Advisory Panel: (April 2005)
http://www.fairtaxanswers.org/linbeck.pdf

News on the Fair Tax:
http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer?pagename=news_current
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Dec 1 2007, 01:09 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Who is Leo Linbeck, and what are his Credentials for steerheading the Fair Tax? (He's one of 3 Founders of AFT)
http://www.linbeck.com/home.html
http://www.tpj.org/docs/2001/11/reports/tlr/page3.html

(Appears to me this man is a rich activist. He also wants Tort reform. He is a former Director for the Federal Reserve (The Fed that should be abolished). So, IMO he is one of the ELITE who are participating with the changes in America. This is one reason to give this group more scrutiny.

Where does he get his authority from to orchestrate a major change to our tax system? If it's the ELITE, then THIS IS NOT WHAT WE WANT. THEY'VE HAD THEIR HANDS IN TOO MUCH ALREADY!)


Linbeck Construction a Member of the AGC: (Construction Association)
http://www.analytical-consulting.com/participants.html#AGC

Linbeck Construction Built this Huge Cathedral:
http://www.diogh.org/cocathedral/index.htm
http://www.diogh.org/cocathedral/cathedral-history.htm

Texans for Tort Reform:
http://www.tortreform.com/leo-linbeck
http://www.tortreform.com/about

Houston Construction Exec to Lead Bonfire Panel Inquiry:
http://lmtonline.com/news/archive/1127/pagea7.pdf

Linbeck Construction Company was a Case Study for OBM (Organizational Behavior Mgmt Network) This may just be OSHA requirements, but it could be more.
http://www.obmnetwork.com/resources/articl...tthews_Linbeck/
http://www.qualitysafetyedge.com/articles/whatIsVBSP.cfm
http://www.qualitysafetyedge.com/clients/c...-using-VBSP.cfm

His Letter to the Committee:
http://www.fairtax.org/site/News2?id=8621&...age=NewsArticle

His Testimony Before the Ways and Means Committee:
http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/LinbeckWays&MeansTestimony.pdf
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/hearings.asp...de=view&id=5196

His Donations to Congressmen: (This should tell you something)
http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail...NBECK&first=LEO

Article: FairTax: Better for America? by Linbeck:
http://www.txfb.org/texasAgriculture/2004/...0204fairtax.htm

--------------------------------
AFFT (Americans for Fair Taxation) designed the Fair Tax, and their Chairman, Leo Linbeck a Houston businessman, said the following:
http://www.geocities.com/cmcofer/leo.html

QUOTE
A national sales tax will comply with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. WTO is the successor to the General Agreement for Tariffs and Trade (GATT).


http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/InternationalCo...Agriculture.pdf

(So, we are now being told what to do by the WTO? Who is running this country?)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Paul on the WTO:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul250.html

WTO Demands Change in US Tax Laws?
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2002/tst012102.htm

Does the WTO Serve Our Interests?
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2005/tst051605.htm

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leo Linbeck III: (His son I assume. He is Catholic, so can assume family is also.)
https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/facultybios/bi...asp?id=04180303
http://www.jonesgsm.rice.edu/Faculty/Leo_L...6;SL:SnID$

http://alliance.rice.edu/Images/alliance/P...s%20release.pdf

Leo Linbeck, III is President and CEO of Aquinas Corporation, the parent company of Linbeck Group, LP and several other operating businesses. Linbeck is one of the 100 largest commercial construction firms in the US. Linbeck employs over 250 professionals and is currently managing the planning and construction of over $500 million of projects nationwide. Linbeck has offices in Houston and Fort Worth, Texas, New Haven, Connecticut and Lexington, Massachusetts. Leo was a founder of the Collaborative Process Institute and the Lean Construction Institute, national initiatives focused on process improvement in construction. He is an adjunct professor at the Jones Graduate School of Management and guest lecturer at Stanford and MIT.
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Dec 1 2007, 01:09 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Who are the Other Two Founders of AFFT?
http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer?pagename=about_us

1) Jack T. Trotter
Self Employed/Private Investments

"Founder, Director - I first became interested in eliminating burdensome tax laws when I was practicing as a CPA and attorney. Too many business decisions are made solely based on tax criteria rather than what’s best for the business. Businesses have to make decisions to mitigate the tax impact of their transactions, because if they don’t the amount of tax could exceed the amount of cash in the transaction. This is bad for the business and at the same time undercuts the revenue-raising potential of the tax system because when one part of the tax base doesn’t pay, others have to make up the difference. I knew we could find a better way to raise revenues for the government."

Pan American Cultural Exchange Donor:
http://members.aol.com/pacefund/

Donor to Houston Hope & AmeriCorps VISTA Programs
http://www.houstonhope.org/staff.html
http://www.houstonhope.org/donors_sponsors.html

Campaign Contributions to Congressmen:
http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail...tter&first=jack

2) Robert (Bob) C. McNair

"Founder, Finance Chairman - As a young man starting out in business with no capital, I learned firsthand how difficult it is to earn enough money to properly capitalize a business. I also learned that being undercapitalized was a competitive disadvantage in the business world.

I would love to help make capital accumulation easier for young entrepreneurs. The enactment of the FairTax would accomplish that goal. The cost of capital will be reduced under the FairTax and young people, by choice, may reduce their consumption and have more after-tax dollars to invest in their businesses.

The FairTax gives people without capital a fair chance to accumulate capital and be competitive in the business world."


Top
jofortruth
Posted: Dec 1 2007, 01:57 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



TWO MAIN PAID PROMOTERS OF THE FAIR TAX:

Radio Host in Atlanta, Neal Boortz, & Rep. John Linder Connection:

(Note: Leo and his group are paying Linder to go all over the country promoting The Fair Tax.)

Neal Boortz Clears Up Some Confusion:
http://boortz.com/nuze/200509/09152005.html

Boortz’s Answer to Bartlett’s Attack on The FairTax
http://huckabee.wordpress.com/the-fair-tax...on-the-fairtax/

Fair Tax Debate - Neal Boortz and Michael Graetz PART 1 of 2

Add to My Profile | More Videos

The Fair Tax Book: Saying Goodbye to the Income Tax and the IRS - Co-Authors Linder and Boortz
http://www.amazon.com/Fair-Tax-Book-Saying...e/dp/0060875496

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rep. John Linder (R-GA) Primary Sponsor of the Fair Tax:
http://linder.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseActi...51-5996F29A075B

Linder - Fair Tax News and Articles:
http://linder.house.gov/index.cfm?fuseacti...df-3a31b4102960





Georgia Republican John Linder first introduced the FairTax bill (H.R.2525) in July 1999 to the 106th United States Congress. He has reintroduced substantially the same bill in each subsequent session of Congress.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FairTax

(This shows the idea has been around for a while, even before the fallout of our economy, the Housing Bust, and fall of the dollar. Therefore, IMO, this shows there's some premeditation to the Fair Tax. It would be nice if they would tell us the REAL MOTIVES, but I won't hold my breathe to get TRUTH. The Elite seem to not be able to be HONEST about anything.) rolleyes.gif
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Dec 1 2007, 03:14 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Various Opinions:

There's No Such Thing as A Fair Tax:
http://www.mises.org/story/1975

QUOTE
But rather than just calling for the elimination of Social Security and Medicare taxes, withholding taxes, corporate taxes, gift taxes, estate taxes, capital gain taxes, and personal income taxes, Boortz proposes to replace all of these taxes with the Fair Tax.


(If the INCOME TAX is illegal, which some say it is and it's being challenged in court, then why not REPEAL IT TOTALLY?)

The Fair Tax Fraud:
http://www.mises.org/story/1814

The Consumption Tax: A Critique - By Murray N. Rothbard
http://www.mises.org/story/1768

Fact Check - Unspinning the Fair Tax:
http://www.factcheck.org/taxes/unspinning_the_fairtax.html
http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Fairtaxrebuttal1.doc

Ron Paul Introduced Legislation to Repeal the 16th Amendment:
http://www.ronpaullibrary.org/document.php?id=658

------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: There are some who say that the 16th Amendment was never ratified properly in the first place.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1494729/posts
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-...RTICLE_ID=17398

IRS Commissioner Evades The Question



-------------------------------------------------------
Greenspan: Consumption Tax Could Help Economy (2005):
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,149298,00.html

HUM! Fed Reserve guy is promoting a Consumption Tax? What's in it for the Fed? While they're at it, why don't they include a clause in the Fair Tax to ABOLISH THE FEDERAL RESERVE? I bet Greenspan wouldn't support that move. rolleyes.gif

Duncan Hunter and Mike Huckabee on the Fair Tax:





Prebate Program - 1st of every month every citizen would get a check in the amount of the consumption sales tax rate up to the point of poverty for each member of the household. It would untax completely the poor and elderly. You must register Annually to get this prebate!
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Dec 1 2007, 03:19 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Scientology's Fair Tax Plot - The New Republic: Plan Backed By Fred Thompson, Other Candidates, Has Roots With L. Ron Hubbard
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/09/07/...Opinion_3241621

Fair Tax - Flawed Tax: (Is this Spin?)
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110010523

(Note: This needs more investigation. Some question Bruce Bartlett's integrity on the issue. He's with the New Republic, which is a group/publication full of NEOCONS like Michael Ledeen, Kagan, etc. NEOCONS LOVE FEARMONGERING. THEY USE IT TO MOVE THEIR AGENDAS, JUST LIKE INTO IRAQ!)
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Dec 1 2007, 04:01 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



A Comparison of the FairTax, the Income Tax, and the Flat Tax
http://www.pafairtax.org/resrcs/FlatTaxFairTaxComparison.pdf
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Dec 1 2007, 04:32 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Where the Presidential Candidates Stand on the Fair Tax:
http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer?pag...s_presScorecard

These Individuals say "YES":

Huckabee
Tancredo
Paul (He says he would support it, but thinks they should deal with Spending.)
Hunter
Gravel


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Paul said ""A pure consumption tax like the Fair Tax would be better than the current system only if we truly did away with the income tax by repealing the 16th Amendment."
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul347.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These Individuals say "NO":

Giuliani
Romney
McCain (now says he would sign it if it came across his desk)
Obama
Clinton



This Individual is Noncommittal:

Thompson


AN IDEA AS RADICAL AS THIS NEEDS SOME REAL SCRUTINY. I DON'T THINK THE FAIR TAX IS IN ITS FINAL FORM, SO IT'S HARD TO MAKE A THOROUGH JUDGMENT. HOWEVER, AT THIS POINT I'M SEEING SOME RED FLAGS WHICH I POST LATER.

Where the Congress Stands:

House:
http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/HouseScorecard.pdf

Senate:
http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/SenateScorecard.pdf
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Dec 2 2007, 11:50 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



PROBLEMS I HAVE WITH THIS: (to note a few only)

1) They also said "The Patriot Act" was going to be a good thing. It isn't! IMO the American people must be very cautious about this, namely because of all of the other lies we've been told. Due diligence is necessary because this is a VERY RADICAL CHANGE. IF IT'S NOT DONE RIGHT, WE COULD BE IN AN EVEN BIGGER MESS.

(Is the Fair Tax more Hegelian Dialectic? Making it sound good by its name, when really it isn't.)

2) John Linder (R-GA) is the AFFT spokesman. They have paid for him to go all over the USA talking about The Fair Tax.

(I would like to know why he, and his friend Neal Boortz, a radio host in Atlanta, wrote the book together on the fair tax, and what their credentials are to be involved in this. Linder is a former dentist turned politician.)
http://boortz.com/nuze/200510/10132005.html

3) They speak of no Direct Tax, but what about Indirect taxes that can't be seen by the people as easily. Example: The HHS has responsibility for adjusting the poverty level annually. A manipulation in this number will adjust the taxes we pay.

(The point - I'm more concerned about the things WE CAN'T SEE IN THIS, and who benefits and who doesn't. Since a BUSINESSMAN is the Chairman of this group and he's from Houston, Texas, that's enough for me to be concerned. Most of the time BUSINESS is involved, they do things to benefit themselves.)

4) Why are we being dictated to by the WTO? Did you catch Linbeck's statement above?

QUOTE
A national sales tax will comply with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. WTO is the successor to the General Agreement for Tariffs and Trade (GATT).


---------------------------------------------------------------------
More questions I have:

1) Since it's a Sales Tax, does this mean anyone living Outside of the USA will no longer pay taxes to the USA? Currently if you're an American citizen living in another country, you have to file 2 tax returns.

2) Since Greenspan likes the idea of a consumption tax, how will the Fair Tax affect the Federal Reserve? Would they put a clause in the Fair Tax to also abolish the Federal Reserve?

3) If the Income Tax is so unfair, why hasn't anything been done before now? All this talk about a fair tax NOW just seems to coincidental to the NWO shananigans. Even LEO (AFT) said that the Fair Tax would conform to what the WTO wants. Could it be anymore clear that they're tied into one another?

4) There have been many court cases regarding the ILLEGAL INCOME TAX, and the individuals have been winning their cases because the courts can't prove that the INCOME TAX is MANDATORY. What does the Administration say about this? If we've been unfairly and illegally taxed for 30 or more years, what reciprocity is forthcoming?

5) Why doesn't the FAIR TAX address the FOUNDATIONS and NON PROFITS that are set up to help the ELITE/RICH? Many of these people don't pay a cent of tax because they use loopholes through Foundations, Shell Companies, Holding Companies and the like. WILL THIS BE STOPPED ALSO?

6) Does the Fair Tax talk about the effect of INDIRECT TAXES on the consumer? They mention DIRECT TAXES. However, both (even though one is unseen) can have major affects on the people.

7) What about the loss of Jobs (IRS workers, Tax Preparers, etc)?

8) Explain how the Fair Tax will be incorporated into the current State Taxes, Municipal taxes, etc.

9) How will the Fair Tax affect WAGES?


(One article above already says that for this to work your Gross wages would come down to your NET amount, thus in actuality reducing your wages.)

10) Why isn't anything in this legislation to deal with the major problem of SPENDING? Fixing the tax code MUST INCLUDE THIS ISSUE.

11) What about the "underground economy"? Won't this increase greatly?

12) So won't this make it MUCH easier for the government to raise taxes just by increasing the rate 1%? Will there be any controls to deal with this?
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Dec 2 2007, 04:42 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



TWO OPINIONS YOU SHOULD READ:

Just How Fair is the Fair Tax?
http://money.cnn.com/2005/09/06/pf/taxes/c...mptiontax_0510/
http://www.taxreductioninstitute.com/ubb/F...TML/000009.html

Harvard Economist, Dale Jorgenson states the following:

1) What the Fair Tax fails to mention is that prices can only fall this sharply if companies cut wages. Example: Say your salary is $100,000, and your net pay after taxes is $80,000. Your company is still paying the $20,000. In the Fair Tax world, it will save that money, and be able to lower its prices accordingly, only if it can reduce your salary to $80,000. In other words, your take-home pay is the same as before. Sure, you'd get to keep 100% of your paycheck, but Boortz and Linder leave out that it would be a smaller paycheck. That's a big thing to leave out. (Referring to the Boortz Linder book)

Note: Boortz Linder promise to FIX THIS OVERSIGHT when their book is reprinted. Make sure they do, if they haven't already. Anyone who bought the first book would have been confused by this MAJOR OVERSIGHT.

What's Wrong with the Fair Tax:
http://www.thelandofthefree.net/conservati...on/fairtax.html

Two Flaws this Writer Sees:

1) Still a group of Americans that do not pay any tax.

2) When it gets implemented, and works, Congress is going to get a lot more money to SPEND on more bloated government.


He goes on to say:

1) The Prebate means those under poverty level pay no Net Tax. Wealthy will have the burden of funding government.

(I can hardly feel sorry for them since most now don't pay any tax due to their Foundations, Exemptions and Tax Deduction Loopholes. Maybe it's their turn for a change?)

2) By changing the "poverty level", elected officials can increase that voting base.

(You see, these are the UNSPOKEN things they don't tell you.)

3) The problem with the Fair Tax is the potential for an upward spiral of government revenues.

4)There is the risk of making Federal bureaucracies so flush with new money, and unless PROPER CONTROLS ARE PUT IN PLACE, AND THE PEOPLE ARE VIGILANT TO FORCE THEIR ELECTED OFFICIALS TO LOWER THE OVERALL SALES TAX AS REVENUES INCREASE, SOCIALISM WILL BECOME RAMPANT.
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Dec 2 2007, 04:50 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Ron Paul on the IRS & Taxes:
http://www.ronpaullibrary.org/topic.php?id=0

Taxes, Spending and Debt are the Real Issues:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul347.html

The Case Against the Income Tax:
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/107/th...the-income-tax/

Cough Up:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul316.html







Ron Paul on CNBC 2004 - UnConstitutional Income Tax



What Does the Constitution Say about Taxes?
http://www.constitutionparty.com/party_platform.php

--------------------------------------------------------------

More Wisdom from Ron Paul: (You should bookmark this site. Updated Reg)
http://www.house.gov/paul/legis.shtml
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Dec 2 2007, 06:16 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Joel Slemrod, University of Michigan Office of Tax Policy Research:
http://webuser.bus.umich.edu/departments/b...lemrod/bio.html
http://www.bus.umich.edu/FacultyBios/CV/jslemrod.pdf

Before the House Ways and Means Committee at the June 8, 2005, Hearing on Tax Reform
http://www.irstaxattorney.com/tax-reform-l...el_Slemrod.html

My Beautiful Tax Reform by Slemrod:
http://www.bus.umich.edu/OTPR/WP2005-12.pdf

Just How Fair is the Fair Tax?
http://money.cnn.com/2005/09/06/pf/taxes/c...mptiontax_0510/

QUOTE
Slemrod says that only six countries in the world have tried to collect a sales tax north of 10%, and four of them eventually adopted alternatives like a VAT (European-style valued-added tax). Consumers might also be unpleasantly surprised by all the things that get taxed: Not just milk at the grocery store, but legal fees, rent on an apartment, even health-care expenses.
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Dec 3 2007, 08:05 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/PlainEnglishSum...rTaxAct2007.pdf

INTERNET PURCHASES WILL BE TAXED UNDER THE FAIR TAX:

QUOTE
Internet Sales:

(Pg 16) "The Fair tax will recapture the billions currently lost from Internet and catalog sales."


NON PROFITS WILL RECEIVE FAVORABLE TREATMENT:

QUOTE
(Pg 27) "Qualified not-for-profit organizations receive favorable tax treatment under the Fair Tax."


(IMO some Non Profits have abused their status, and yet again they will get FAVORABLE TAX TREATMENT?) rolleyes.gif
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 19 2008, 01:39 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE FAIR TAX:

Fair Tax, Flawed Tax
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110010523

QUOTE
Does adding 30% to the price of every house sold sound like a good idea to you?


Fair tax promoters planting false hope
http://newsok.com/article/3205270/1203197189

Fair Tax & Flawed Logic:
http://www.stan-geiger.com/item/211/

QUOTE
The so-called "fair tax" is BS. And while the promoters claim it's a grassroots initiative, I suspect it's a movement promoted and funded by the wealthy.


IMO, you can add to his comment and say it is for the NWO Elite because if you look around the globe other countries are talking about a flat tax also. It's just more harmonization, so that the United Nations can take over one day. This is the direction the ELITE are taking us.

QUESTION: If there was such a need for this, why don't they do it in good times, rather than in the middle of a crisis?

ANSWER: Because it's easier to get things passed in Congress when there's a crisis. Do you remember what happened immediately after 911 in the form of legislation being passed without even being read? Opportunistic, You bet!

The following article shows that this tax idea is global. So, IMO, this is being promoted by the NWO ELITE. You decide!
http://www.bbj.hu/news/news_34480.html
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/Pag...orce_login=true
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 19 2008, 04:19 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



http://economics.about.com/od/lettersonthe...nst_fairtax.htm


I beg to differ with his statement that this is the only man against the Fair Tax!

Have you studied the FAIR TAX proposal? Have you asked Linder and Boortz, or their promoters hard questions about this tax? Have you performed your DUE DILIGENCE on the issue? If not, then you shouldn't be blindly supporting it just because on the surface "it sounds good." Many made the same "feel good" decision when they voted for Bush/Cheney. You know what the results of that decision were now.

THE POINT: GET INFORMED, AND QUIT SUPPORTING IDEAS UNTIL YOU HAVE DONE YOUR OWN DUE DILIGENCE ON THE SUBJECT. ALSO STOP VOTING PEOPLE INTO OFFICE YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT. THE QUICK PASSAGE OF THE PATRIOT ACT, AND THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION SHOULD HAVE TAUGHT YOU THAT! BOTH WERE DECEPTIVE!
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 23 2008, 07:28 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Trying to make sense of the Numbers:

What Boortz Says:
http://huckabee.wordpress.com/the-fair-tax...-on-the-fairtax

QUOTE
It’s so very simple: When you see a lamp on the shelf marked $100, you will pay $100 for that lamp when you get to the checkout. You will receive a receipt which shows that $23 of the $100 you have paid represents the FairTax. You do the math for yourself, but every time I work it out it comes to 23%.

The 23 percent FairTax is not added to the price of everything you buy … it is already included in the price of everything you will buy, just as the embedded taxes are included today. You remove one, you add the other.


So then explain how this "embedded tax" works today? Your explanation isn't complete until you do this to help us understand.

What Others Say:
http://www.channelingreality.com/News/fair...he_fair_tax.htm

QUOTE
The 23% ‘inclusive’ sales tax rate is actually 30%.  They deceive supporters using mathematical trickery.  Assume you are going to buy a $10.00 item.  The sales tax rate will be 30% making the total $13.00.   They then use the $3.00 tax as a percentage of the $13.00 total to come up with the 23% rate.     3.00 / 13.00  = .23   That’s the reason for the ‘inclusive’ qualifier on the tax rate they give.
QUOTE
Those of us who were skeptical from the beginning noticed this when we got to page 84. There Boortz used the example of a single mother with two children spending $45 a week on groceries. He claims that the removal of the taxes currently embedded in the price would lower the cost of the groceries to $35.10 (a dubious proposition). But then he says: "Add the FairTax, and the groceries would cost $45.58. I learned in the sixth grade that if an item cost $35.10, and I add to it $10.48 in sales tax, then I paid a tax rate of almost 30 percent—not 23 percent.

Boortz says in the "Questions and Objections" chapter that "critics of the FairTax have a way of dwelling on this 30 percent figure." I wonder why? Although Boortz explains that he is using an exclusive rate rather than an inclusive rate to figure the percentage, his "mathematical equivalent of a game of semantics" still results in a FairTax rate of 30 percent. This is why Boortz prefers the national sales tax to be included in the price of each item—so the consumer doesn't realize that he is really paying an extra 30 percent in sales tax, not Boortz's new math amount of 23 percent.
QUOTE
In reality, the FairTax rate is not 23%. Messrs. Linder and Chambliss get this figure by calculating the tax as if it were already incorporated into the price of goods and services. (This is known as the tax-inclusive rate.) Calculating it the conventional way that every other (This is called the tax-exclusive rate.)

The distinction is confusing, but think of it this way. If a product costs $1 at retail, the FairTax adds 30%, for a total of $1.30. Since the 30-cent tax is 23% of $1.30, FairTax supporters say the rate is 23% rather than 30%.
QUOTE
Americans for Fair Taxation offers the following plain-language interpretation of H.R. 25:

Americans for Fair Taxation: A 23-percent (of the tax-inclusive sales price) sales tax is imposed on all retail sales for personal consumption of new goods and services.


It is the parenthetical that is important, for it hides the real truth of the tax rate.

QUOTE
First consider the way in which sales tax is normally figured. A consumer good that carries a $100 price tag might be subject to a 5 percent sales tax. That means that the final bill for the item is $105. The 5 percent figure is the amount of tax that is charged on the original purchase price. But now suppose that instead of pricing the item at $100, the shop owner simply priced the item at $105, then sent $5 directly to the state. The $105 price would be a tax-inclusive sales price. But $5 is just 4.8 percent of $105. That 4.8 percent number, however, is relatively meaningless. You are still paying exactly the same 5 percent tax on the item.

The 23 percent number in H.R. 25 is the equivalent of the 4.8 percent in the previous example. To calculate the real rate of the sales tax, we have to determine the original purchase price of an item. We can begin with the same $100 item, keeping in mind that a price tag that reads $100 has sales tax already built in. If our tax rate is 23 percent of the tax-inclusive sales price, then of the $100 final price, $23 of those dollars will be for taxes, meaning that the original pre-tax price of the item is $77. To get $23 in taxes on a $77 item, one must impose a 30 percent tax. In other words, a 23 percent sales tax on the tax-inclusive sales price is equivalent to a 30 percent tax on the actual price of the item.


THE PROBLEM IS: Boortz and Linder weren't very clear in their book as to how this is calculated. To make matters worse, they use jargon like "inclusive" and "exclusive". Why don't they just make it a flat amount and be clear? Get rid of the "inclusive" "exclusive", or explain how this would play out say if 1) the retailer increases his prices, or 2) if the fair tax is increased. Give us all of the possible scenarios in an example!

IMO, if they are claiming this is "simple", then they need to give us more information and make it "simple". Something still appears to be hidden. The word "hidden" doesn't mean "transparency". Go back to the drawing board!
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 23 2008, 07:46 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Some Federal Taxes will still be around which we will have to pay in addition to the "fair tax": (See Problem #14)
http://www.mises.org/story/1975


1) Excise Tax on Gasoline


2) Taxes on Airline Tickets



Boortz Says there are no exclusions or exemptions, yet there are exceptions:

1) Internet access services

2) Tuition



In the 1st Fair Tax book it says this about the Internet:

QUOTE
Several recent laws dealt with a tax on accessing the Internet, not charging a sales tax on things sold there. Sales taxes and use taxes apply to Internet sales today, but Internet shoppers simply fail to pay them.


Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 23 2008, 08:17 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 23 2008, 08:36 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Rebate - How it will Work:
http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/PlainEnglishSum...rTaxAct2007.pdf

(See Pg 13 - Chapter 3)

* Families who choose to receive the rebate MUST REGISTER ANNUALLY with the State. If you don't register, there is no rebate.

* The registration form requires the following: 1) name of each family member who shares the residence, 2) Social Security number of each family member, 3) family member to whom the rebate should be paid, 4) A sworn statement that all listed family members are lawful residents, that all family members sharing the common residence are listed, and that no family members are incarcerated; and 5) The address of the shared residence.

* "Qualified Family" - one or more family members sharing the common residence. Incarcerated individuals are not eligible.

* In order for a person to be counted as a member of the family for purposes of determining the size of the "qualified family", a person must have a valid Social Security Number and be a lawful resident of the United States.

* After the initial registration, any qualified family that fails to renew its registration each year, within 30 days of the family determination date, will cease receiving the rebate 90 days following the failure to register. However, the family can file to get up to six months of missed rebates later.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Poverty Level Spending and Annual Adjustment:

* The rebate is paid on poverty level spending.

* Department of Health and Human Services calculates this amount annually, and is based on necessities.

* The monthly sales tax rebate is equal to the FairTax rate (23 percent) times the monthly poverty level.
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 23 2008, 08:43 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Comparison of Federal Tax Revenue Systems
http://www.lafayettesbest.com/category/summary.html


QUOTE
The following is taken from a statement given by the founder of the American Constitutional Research Service to the Committee on Ways and Means, United States House of Representatives, June 1995

A national sales tax would give Congress an across the board percentage of our economy by laying an internal tax, whether such revenue is needed or not. The national sales tax idea would do ill to our nation as it is an internal system of taxation which ultimately increases the cost of goods manufactured on American soil, burdens the American Citizen in its collection, and is to be paid BY the farmer, mechanic, laborer, etc. who will continue to see the intrusion of the "tax gatherer of the United States" if such a system is adopted!

It is also important to note how imposts and duties (external taxation) were successfully used to encourage domestic manufacturing and assist in building a strong industrial base. The first revenue raising Act imposed an across-the-board tax on imports which was higher for imports shipped in foreign owned foreign built vessels, and discounted the tax for imports arriving in American owned American built ships.

This skillful use of external taxation gave American ship builders a hometown advantage and predictably resulted in America's merchant marine becoming the most powerful on the face of the planet. In addition, our national treasury was filled by foreigners paying for the privilege of doing business on American soil.

But this was back when members of Congress, and those running for Office, put American interests first and would have considered NAFTA, GATT and the WTO as acts of sedition, and would have tarred and feathered those promoting such surrender of America's sovereignty.

A national sales tax plan which omits external taxation as a principal source to fill our national treasury, is in fact a surrender of national sovereignty to the advantage of foreign interests!

In closing, many of the same people who promoted the NAFTA, GATT and the WTO (the free trade crowd) are now promoting various forms of tax reform ... each proposal cleverly maintaining internal taxation as a principal means to raise a national revenue. Let us continually keep in mind the important distinction between internal and external taxation while working toward the elimination of income taxation and strive to return to the Founding Father's original tax preform package which provided the means allowing America to become the economic envy of the world.
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 23 2008, 08:50 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



More Proof that the WTO is Involved in this: (So where do they get their authority? From the UN? What does this tell you?)
http://www.hktdc.com/alert/cba-e0006.htm

Countries are Jumping Through Hoops to Comply with WTO Requirements:
http://vietnamnews.vnanet.vn/2004-04/15/Stories/15.htm

New WTO Decision on US Tax Law Could Kill the Golden Goose
http://www.americaneconomicalert.org/view_art.asp?Prod_ID=44

QUOTE
This victory is no isolated incident. Last November, a Legal Times study showed that the United States has been the most sued -- and most successfully sued -- of the WTO's 144 member states since 2000.

(So is this about some lame Treaty, maybe NAFTA, that Bush, Clinton, Bush have signed, obligating us to the WTO?)


The Flawed WTO Tax Decision
http://www.freedomandprosperity.org/Articles/mitchell3.pdf

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Boortz and Linder need to put this in their book, and tell the American people that this is ALL ABOUT THE NEW WORLD ORDER, AND THE FINANCIAL RESTRUCTURING OF THE ENTIRE WORLD.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you remember what Linbeck said, earlier in this thread?

QUOTE
A national sales tax will comply with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. WTO is the successor to the General Agreement for Tariffs and Trade (GATT).


THIS IS A STEPPING STONE TO THE ELITE NEW WORLD ORDER, FOLKS! I URGE CAUTION BEFORE YOU JUMP ON THIS BAND WAGON!
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Legislation Pending & Passed by Congress / and Hearings | Next Newest »
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience.
Learn More · Register Now

Topic OptionsPages: (2) [1] 2 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.3532 seconds | Archive