Welcome to The Great Deception. We hope you enjoy your visit.
You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


 

 ** Third Way Goal - World Govt - Communitarianism, Clinton Promotes this
jofortruth
  Posted: Jun 22 2007, 02:54 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jun 27 2007, 09:06 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Third Way and Newt Gingrich's "Contract with America"

Part 1:
http://www.usiap.org/Viewpoints/Zhold/Thir...TWCSeries1.html

Part 2:
http://www.usiap.org/Viewpoints/Zhold/Thir...TWCSeries2.html

"Mr. Gingrich told his fellow Congressmen, in his Republican Revolution Victory Speech in November of 1994, that "The Third Way [The Third Wave is the correct title of the book]"
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Sep 17 2007, 10:47 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



QUOTE
The Communist Doctrine of Three Waves

"Marx outlined three private property phases of man - waves if you will:  1. Slavery, 2. Feudalism, and 3. Capitalism. Capitalism, he further subdivided into, the Industrial Revolution, The Imperialist Period - that time when credit, corporations, and government would centralize on an international basis; and finally, the Dictatorship of the Proletariat - or the brutal and final transitional phase to full communism, when the last remnants of capitalism, to include its religion, it's property, and its conception of the family, are obliterated." 
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Nov 8 2007, 09:00 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Why Lou Dobbs is Winning: (Paper of The Third Way Think Tank)
http://third-way.com/data/product/file/113..._is_Winning.pdf

Free trade fisticuffs
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1107/6745.html


More on The Third Way - Yet Another USELESS Think Tank:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...?showtopic=1210
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Nov 30 2007, 08:18 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



THE THIRD WAY - Politics Of The Radical Center
http://www.watch-unto-prayer.org/thirdway.html


Top
jofortruth
Posted: Mar 29 2009, 05:07 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Top
jofortruth
Posted: May 5 2009, 07:37 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



QUOTE
Also pg 6:

The founder of the Communitarian Network was praised by both Bill and Hillary Clinton as an inspiration and for helping to achieve a new communitarian vision for the country. (Bill Clinton told Americans about the communitarian ideology twice during the latter part of Obama's campaign; Hillary accused Iowans of not being communitarian enough.


(AND WHO SAID THE CLINTONS AND BUSHES, AND OTHERS COULD REIGN FOREVER? THEY ACT AS IF ONCE THEY ARE GIVEN THE PRESIDENCY BY THE ELITES (WHO THEY PUPPET FOR) THEY CAN STAY FOREVER.) angry.gif

GAO Report on COPS 2005:
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06104.pdf

QUOTE
COPS Grants Were a Modest Contributor to Declines in Crime in the 1990s


So, since they don't help the situation, they must have been created for another purpose. Of course, we never hear about the REAL PURPOSE of these types of programs until they're entrenched! That's the way our government does things. They let us in on things YEARS AFTER THEY'VE IMPLEMENTED THEM! rolleyes.gif

Quiet Revolution:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...?showtopic=4116

See pg 6:

QUOTE
The communitarian Third Way and it's theory of Reinvented Government has yet to prove itself as a superior theory to the founding American legal principles for protecting individuals from the community. It has, on the other hand, proven itself to be a potential problem of global proportions. One can only imagine what kinds of crimes COMPASS would predict if we put in the data about  the COPS.
Top
jofortruth
Posted: May 6 2009, 11:19 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Top
jofortruth
Posted: May 6 2009, 01:12 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



THE THIRD WAY - Politics Of The Radical Center
http://watch.pair.com/thirdway.html

Top
jofortruth
Posted: May 6 2009, 02:36 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



QUOTE
The Third Way

Bill Clinton had become a Rhodes scholar in the late 1960s with support from Prof. Quigley and Rhodes scholar U.S. Senator J. William Fulbright, who had authored "Old Myths and New Realities" (1964), announcing:

"Indeed, the concept of national sovereignty has become in our time a principle of international anarchy... The sovereign nation can no longer serve as the ultimate unit of personal loyalty and responsibility."

During then Governor Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign, his Rhodes scholar roommate at Oxford University, CFR director Strobe Talbott, wrote in Time magazine (July 20, 1992) that

"perhaps national sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all... But it has taken the events in our own wondrous and terrible century to clinch the case for world government."


For that article, Talbott would receive the World Federalist Association (WFA)'s "Norman Cousins Global Governance Award," and on June 22, 1993, President Clinton would send a congratulatory letter to the WFA regarding the award, saying that previous WFA president Norman Cousins had worked for world peace "and world government." President Clinton ended the letter by wishing the WFA "future success." The WFA's objective is world federal government, and in 1994 it published "The Genius of Federation: Why World Federation Is the Answer to Global Problems", in which it strategized:

"Let the U.N. establish new agencies such as the International Criminal Court... National sovereignty would be gradually eroded until it is no longer an issue. Eventually a world federation can be formally adopted with little resistance."

In November 2003, the WFA merged with the "Campaign for United Nations Reform" to form a new organization called "Citizens for Global Solutions" with the motto "Building a World Community Under Law."

During his presidency, Bill Clinton would also develop a close relationship with British Prime Minister Tony Blair (a vice-president of Socialist International), whose "The Third Way: New Politics for the New Century" calling for "ethical socialism" was published in September 1998 by the Fabian (Socialist) Society. And in The Washington Post (April 7, 1999), Rhodes scholar E.J. Dionne, Jr. wrote "A World Safe for Socialism," describing how the Democratic Leadership Council

"...found itself playing host... to four Western European leaders whose parties have socialist and social democratic roots... All subscribe to versions of the 'Third Way' approach to politics that Blair and Clinton have been marketing."

When Bill Clinton was first campaigning for the presidency, he took a "tough" stand concerning policy toward Communist China. However, over the years of his presidency, his policies toward that nation took a dramatically more friendly shift. On ABC's "This Week" (March 15, 1997), Rhodes scholar and former Clinton administration communications director George Stephanopoulos (CFR member) revealed: "There were a lot of reasons the president changed his policy on China... It had little to do with [Chinese] contributions." And when Cokie Roberts on the same program, said, "It had more to do with American money," Stephanopoulos replied: " Council on Foreign Relations, Lehman Brothers, Goldman-Sachs, absolutely." Quite a few Rhodes scholars have occupied high-level positions with Goldman-Sachs over the years.

At this point, someone might say that they understand that Cecil Rhodes had a secret society to take over the world, and that Rhodes scholars like Robert Reich, Ira Magaziner, James Woolsey and others played important roles in the Clinton Administration. But, they might say, "That's all over, isn't it, now that Clinton has left office?"



So, these guys get to decide our future, without our consent? Where do they get their authority to decide this? It's most certainly not from the US Constitution, which they would just as soon see gone!

Clinton, Bush and now OBAMA have and are signing Intl Treaties which are eroding our Sovereignty as a Nation, and eroding our US CONSTITUTION. You will see soon, the SENATE talking about CIFTA and THE LAW OF THE SEA (AGAIN), and if they pass these treaties, we will see further erosion our Sovereignty and rights under our US CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS.

These men, like so many others, have no authority to do what they're doing, and WE THE PEOPLE must tell them so!
rolleyes.gif
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jun 18 2009, 06:27 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Gingrich, Toffler, and Gore: A peculiar trio (Democrats In Drag: Third Way Fall From Grace, Part III):
http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/art...1thirdwayp3.htm

More on Gingrich:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...wtopic=789&st=0

More on Gore:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...p?showtopic=696
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Aug 23 2009, 06:33 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Also referred to as "Communitarianism":
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?to...cseen#msg788047
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Aug 27 2009, 09:52 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Sarah Palin vs Eziekiel Emanuel-Lessons in the Hegelian Dialectic
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=153750

QUOTE
The Hegelian Dialectic is the ideological blueprint for manipulating people into fighting over issues. Skillful use of Hegelian tactics is a requirement for all modern politicians. The ultimate goal of every major political player in the game right now is to weaken both sides of every argument, so that a "middle ground" for the "common good" can be formed between them. This is the simple formula for tricking the world into accepting a totalitarian central government. It's happening in every country on the planet.

When Betsy McCaughey published her article called "Deadly Doctors," she sure opened a big can of political worms. She identified the philosophy of Obama's new health advisor, Ezekiel Emanuel as "communitarianism."

"Emanuel, however, believes that "communitarianism" should guide decisions on who gets care. He says medical care should be reserved for the non-disabled, not given to those "who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens . . . An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia" (Hastings Center Report, Nov.-Dec. '96). " (Betsy McCaughey, founder of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths and a former New York lieutenant governor writing in "Deadly Doctors" about Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, Obama's health policy advisor and brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel)

The problem is, the gods of globalism are still not ready to explain their new philosophy to the American people. Americans are much more effective if they continue to believe their sides still exist and keep the great political divides alive. Awareness of the emerging synthesis of all ideologies (called communitarianism) is reserved for insiders. To become an insider one must agree to go along with the big lie, for as long as the lie remains necessary. Once the world has completely adopted supremacy of communitarian law, the truth about the system won't matter much, because the communitarian police will have community enforcement authority over every individual in the world.

The American public is just not ready to be told the truth about the real philosophy driving all new changes to US law. Citizens age 50 and beyond may never be told. Communitarians insist all nations must be eliminated and that would upset the people who still think the US Constitution and their state constitutions are valid legal contracts. So the former Lt governor of the state of New York provided way more information than the Americans need to know. Something radical had to be done quickly to drive the topic back into obscurity. Just as hundreds of Americans started asking what the heck communitarianism is, the global scriptwriters made major changes to the book. Enter Sarah Palin, stage right.

On the surface it certainly appears that Sarah Palin and Barack Obama's Health advisor, Ezekiel Emanuel, are on "opposite" sides. Sarah clearly represents the fundamentalist Christian Republican Right, while Obama and Zeke obviously represent the open-minded non-denominational Democratic Left. Their millions of followers on both sides are totally convinced the "other" side are the bad guys and their own side is the good guys. This belief in their superior side means they never have to study the other side, or God forbid, to wonder what the outcome of all this fighting may be. Like mad dogs trained to fight in the arena, true believers go for the jugular veins of their opponents without a second thought as to why.

Sarah Palin proved her worth to the communitarians when she entered the national political scene as John McCains' Republican running mate. They made her a star in the best horror soap opera ever written. It might look like they plan to kill her off, but rest assured, they'll bring her back whenever they need her to keep the story line alive. And right now, they need her. Upon entering the staged presidential campaign in a whirlwind of exposure, Palin made an easy target of herself and successfully fueled the inflated egos of every deluded Republican and Democrat in the country. All it took to keep (nonexistent) American attention away from any possible awareness of Obama's communitarian philosophy was to bring a superstar like Palin into the campaign. And all it took to steer (possible) attention away from Emanuel's exposed communitarian philosophy was to bring Palin into the "debate."

"His views aren't limited to this one [the Lancet ] article. In 1996, he wrote a short article for the Hastings Center, in which he expounded upon the role that communitarianism might play in healthcare. Dr Emanuel's bio-ethical views are heavily fueled by adherence to this philosophy of communitarianism. Briefly put, communitarianism is a fairly new political philosophy that emphasizes the role of the community in defining and shaping individuals. Communitarianism focuses on the need to balance individual rights and interests with that of the community as a whole, and that individual people (or citizens) are shaped by the cultures and values of their communities." http://www.politicalevidence.com/2009/08/o...el-emanuel.html

Now the debate is between the most uneducated politician on the national scene and the "esteemed" bioethics professor who cares about people. Their most dumbed down followers argue over who's the nicer, more credentialed player. Communitarian agents scour the Internet forums and steer any discussion of communitarianism back to outdated (and now discarded) left and right theories. The substance of the debate never became centered on the actual and verifiable philosophy that drives the National Healthcare agenda. The only political argument allowed is between the left and the right (just as the only religious debate allowed is between the Christians and the Muslims). These phony, misleading debates are led by second grade bullies who won't acknowledge communitarianism until their teachers make them write it a hundred times on the blackboard. When the American followers are finally told that communitarianism is their new political and justice system, their assigned Borg leaders will make sure everyone reaches consensus and agrees that it's a "good" thing.

Hegelians don't care what the issues are. Neither do they care which "side" they are perceived to be on. Their role is to be a barrier to any authentic political discourse that may arise from thinking people. Hegelians do not think for themselves, they follow orders. They repeat words that have no meaning to them, throw around words they cannot define and have no interest in defining. When asked directly what they mean by a particular word, they always respond with "what do you mean what do I mean?" as if you're just too stupid to be answered. Most followers haven't got the first clue what sustainability, livability, health and safety, and quality of life means. They build "good communities" and only stupid people ask them what they mean by good.

Appealing mainly to the egotistical and self-centered, the Hegelians promote the idea that they and their followers are superior to the common man in every way. Born again Hegelians may not be able to tell us who they follow, but they will always insist their ideas are more "enlightened" than common folks. Over educated, upper academic Hegelians believe God told Hegel the only reasonable future society is a friendly, caring, global police state. Uneducated Hegelians don't even know they're Hegelians.

All unenlightened sheep are to be kept locked inside very publicized dialectical conflicts of opposites. Only the unseen, enlightened few understand the actual goal of all the conflicts. The most useful idiots are the ones who believe their side is the side that cares oh so much more about "people" than the other side. Completely brainwashed Hegelian thinkers go so far as to believe they are born smarter than the other side, with many convinced they were chosen by God himself to rule over all of mankind, forever. Taught to use any stupid argument at their disposal that enrages their assigned opposite "side," their job is to fuel established conflicts and say anything they want, as long as it keeps the masses distracted.

The more outrageous their behaviors, the more outrageous the response is from their gullible public followers. This is why hateful slurs, mocking, sneering, racial insults, un-humorous "jokes," accusations, slander and Godlike condemnations are such a big part of our national political discourse. Like Hegel taught the leaders of the emerging supranational system, ideological conflicts that grow into violent clashes between huge groups of people are the best way to "help" save the world. Follower's on both sides of every conflict use the same, tired arguments because both sides follow the same Hegelian playbook. To the Man, Straw Man, Wag the Dog or fists and guns... they do whatever it takes.

It's not an accident that every rebuttal I get to my articles on communitarianism insist it's an insignificant term that means nothing. I actually just got new comments on my blog that explained the "difference" between liberals and socialists, and anonymous never mentioned the word communitarian once! The debate between communitarianism and US constitutional law will never reach the public until it's completely over. First we all have to come together for a purpose greater than self. Then we can all rise together in perfect harmony, or we can fall into the pits with the others who refuse to be "free."

"Clinton said Obama's election was the first one in which people were "self-consciously communitarian - understanding we are going to rise and fall together."" http://www.pittnews.com/node/19708
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Aug 27 2009, 10:08 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Anti-Communitarian League:
http://nord.twu.net/acl/

Living Outside of the Dialetic:
http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com/

The Anti Communitarian Manifesto
http://nord.twu.net/acl/manifesto.html

QUOTE
Question: What do George Bush (USA), Tony Blair (UK), Gerhard Schroeder (Germany), Bill and Hillary Clinton (USA), Ariel Sharon (Israel), Mikhail Gorbachev (USSR), Jiang Zemin (China), The Pope (Vatican), Prince Charles (England), Queen Beatrix (The Hague), Amitai Etzioni (Israel/USA) and Kofi Annan (United Nations) have in common?

Answer: Every one of them is a political communitarian, and communitarianism is the synthesis in the Hegelian dialectic. Nobody ever seems to have heard of these things, so we wrote What is the Hegelian Dialectic? and The Historical Evolution of Communitarian Thinking. They were originally published seperately, but we combined them to form our definitive Anti Communitarian Manifesto.
[/SIZE]
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jun 17 2010, 09:26 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



The Hegelian Dialectic and The Third Wave (Third Way) Synthesis part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxZe3vv2EIE




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Wf8MR6B3y4&feature=related





THIS SOUNDS LIKE A COMPUTER GENERATED VIDEO AND THE SOUND IS ANNOYING. YOU MAY WANT TO TURN YOUR VOLUME DOWN AND JUST READ IT FOR YOURSELF! IT IS INFORMATIVE IN EXPLAINING THE HEGELIAN DIALECTIC AND THIRD WAY.
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jul 5 2011, 10:19 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



A Communitarian Defense of Judicial Review:
http://alcor.concordia.ca/~gnosis/vol_xi_1/Communitarian.pdf



See also Constitution as a "living document" vs "originalists:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...wtopic=1463&hl=
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Nov 22 2011, 11:08 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



2020: Our Common Destiny by Niki Raapana:
http://nord.twu.net/acl/books.html
http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com


She is an outspoken critic of Communitarianism!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPW5rC-chDU...be_gdata_player

QUOTE
There is an old social theory that in order to create a healthier planet, people everywhere must learn the value of collectivism. Its many proponents insist that individual rights and liberties pose a real threat to the health and safety of the "community at large. If we will just put the community before self-centered concerns, mankind can eliminate war and poverty. To many, it is our evolutionary destiny and our moral duty to comply with the spirit of community.

The founders of the Communitarian Network began "shoring up the moral, social and political environment" in the early 1990s. Today the communitarian theory is the basis for hundreds of new global rules and regulations eliminating individual rights, yet fewer than one percent of the affected population knows about it.

Communitarianism was embraced by leaders in every nation after it was financed by the international banking elite. Today the theory of community influences all aspects of life: news, science, money, law, land use, health, education, policing and employment, not to mention the arts, fashion, fundraising, causes and entertainment. Community is the buzzword on everybody's lips these days.



Communitarianism: Globalist Totalitarian Takeover of US Cities
(The Jeff Rense Show - March 28, 2007)
http://70.86.73.4/raapana/raapana1.mp3
http://70.86.73.4/raapana/raapana2.mp3
http://70.86.73.4/raapana/raapana3.mp3
(56 kbps, 50 MB)
Top
jofortruth
Posted: May 9 2012, 03:14 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



A list of Famous Communitarians: (Famous for being smucks and idiots, ie) (You can add the Globalist Minion Presidents - Bush Sr, Clinton, Bush Jr and Obama to this list because this is part of the Globalist agenda, to turn America into a Communitarian aka Communist system through Agenda 21/Sustainability)
http://combios.maripo.com/
http://www.in.gov/icpr/2757.htm
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jun 17 2012, 11:12 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 2 2013, 09:19 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,494
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



The Fabian Society, the Third Way and modern British thought
http://churchmousec.wordpress.com/2010/05/...ritish-thought/

The Fabian connection:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...wtopic=2427&hl=
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | New World Order (NWO) / Globalization / (See Freemasonry under Religion/Cults) | Next Newest »


Topic Options



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.2637 seconds | Archive