The Great Deception -> * Iron Mountain: Blue Print For Tyranny

* Iron Mountain: Blue Print For Tyranny, A Literal Report from Hell! A MUST READ!

Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic

jofortruth	Posted: May 1 2007, 10:48 AM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,704 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/Report_fr...on_Mountain.pdf http://www.scribd.com/doc/6959970/Report-F...bility-of-Peace Report From Iron Mountain: On The Possibility of Peace Publish at Scribd or explore others: School Work Other Non-fiction report Iron Mountain NOTE: I have a copy of this book, and the following is indeed what it says! Written in the 1960s. http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...?showtopic=7111

jofortruth

Posted: May 1 2007, 12:02 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_soci...ronmountain.htm

About:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Report_From_Iron_Mountain

You Tube - 14 pts:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj9tkhCVfao

Video:
http://youtu.be/5p4h7S71nTA
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6745627342652553091

QUOTE

The UN is a Communist, Illuminist, Masonic World Dictatorship with no freedoms, hence they must get our guns to eliminate our free State/Nation guaranteed in our Constitution.

Iron Mountain is a report on how to circumvent the Constitution of the USA.

QUOTE

"War can be used to arouse human passion and patriotic feelings of loyalty to the nation's leaders. No amount of sacrifice in the name of victory will be rejected. Resistance is viewed as TREASON. But, in times of peace, people become resentful of high taxes, shortages, and bureaucratic intervention. When they become disrespectful of their leaders, they become dangerous. No government has long survived without enemies and armed conflict. War, therefore, has been an indispensable condition for stabilizing society."

http://crashrecovery.org/ironmountain/#microwaved

QUOTE

The Mission of their Research:

Iron Mountain is a report created by 15 experts in their field about the problem of how geopolitical strategies must be changed and adapted in order to stay and maintain a successful global governance, without the need to wage wars.

(This document was kept suppressed for many years)

Note: In the video the moderator mentions the Book of Enoch. The Book of Enoch is any of several works that attribute themselves to Enoch, the great-grandfather of Noah and son of Jared (Genesis 5:18). These works are reputedly a product of ancient Jewish literature.

jofortruth

Posted: May 1 2007, 12:10 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

New York Times Book Review: March 19, 1972
"Report From Iron Mountain" - 'The Guest Word' - By LEONARD LEWIN
http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/ironmtn.html#sec.7

QUOTE

The book came out in November, 1967, and generated controversy as soon as it appeared. It purported to be the secret report of an anonymous "Special Study Group," set up, presumably at a very high level of government, to determine the consequences to American society of a "permanent" peace, and to draft a program to deal with them. Its conclusions seemed shocking.

This commission found: that even in the unlikely event that a lasting peace should prove "attainable," it would almost surely be undesirable; that the "war system" is essential to the functioning of a stable society; that until adequate replacement for it might be developed, wars and an "optimum" annual number of war deaths must be methodically planned and budgeted. And much more. Most of the Report deals with the "basic" functions of war (economic, political, sociological, ecological, etc.) and with possible substitutes to serve them, which were examined and found wanting. The text is preceded by my foreword, along with other background furnished by the "John Doe" who made the Report available.

The first question raised, of course, was that of its authenticity. But government spokesmen were oddly cautious in phrasing their denials, and for a short time, at least in Washington, more speculation was addressed to the Group's members and of their sponsorship than to whether the Report was an actual quasi-official document. (The editors of Trans-action magazine, which ran an extensive round-up of opinion on the book, noted that government officials, as a class, were those most likely to accept it as the real thing.)

Eventually, however, in the absence of definitive confirmation either way, commentators tended to agree that it must be a political satire. In that case, who could have written it? Among the dozens of names mentioned, those of J. K. Galbraith and myself appeared most often, along with a mix of academics, politicians, think-tank drop-outs, and writers.

Most reviewers, relatively uncontaminated by overexposure to real-politik, were generous to what they saw as the author's intentions: to expose a kind of thinking in high places that was all too authentic, influential, and dangerous, and to stimulate more public discussion of some of the harder questions of war and peace. But those who felt their own oxen gored-who could identify themselves in some way with the government, the military, "systems analysis", the established order of power-were not. They attacked, variously, the substance of the Report; the competence of those who praised its effectiveness; and the motives of whomever they assigned the obloquy of authorship, often charging him with an disingenuous sympathy for the Report's point of view. The more important think-tankers, not unreasonably seeing the book as an indictment of their own collective moral sensibilities and intellectual pretensions, proffered literary as well as political judgements: very bad satire, declared Herman Kahn; lacking in bite, wrote Henry Rowen, of Rand. Whoever wrote it is an idiot, said Henry Kissinger . A handful of far-right zealots and eccentrics predictably applauded the Report's conclusions.

That's as much background as I have room for, before destroying whatever residuum of suspense may still persist about the book's authorship. I wrote the "Report," all of it. (How it came about and who was privy to the plot I'll have to discuss elsewhere.) But why as a hoax?

What I intended was simply to pose the issues of war and peace in a provocative way. To deal with the essential absurdity of the fact that the war system, however much deplored, is nevertheless accepted as part of the necessary order of things. To caricature the bankruptcy of the think-tank mentality by pursuing its style of scientistic thinking to its logical ends. And perhaps, with luck, to extend the scope of public discussion of "peace planning" beyond its usual, stodgy limits.

Several sympathetic critics of the book felt that the guessing-games it set off tended to deflect attention from those objectives, and thus to dilute its effects. To be sure. Yet if the "argument" of the Report had not been hyped up by its ambiguous authenticity-is it just possibly for real?-its serious implications wouldn't have been discussed either. At all. This may be a brutal commentary on what it sometimes takes to get conspicuous exposure in the supermarket of political ideas, or it may only exemplify how an oblique approach may work when directed engagement fails. At any rate, the who-done-it aspect of the book was eventually superseded by sober critiques.

At this point it became clear that whatever surviving utility the Report might have, if any, would be as a point-of-departure book-for the questions it raises, not for the specious "answers" it purports to offer. And it seemed to me that unless a minimum of uncertainty about its origins could be sustained-i.e., so long as I didn't explicitly acknowledge writing it-its value as a model for this kind of "policy analysis" might soon be dissipated. So I continued to play the no-comment game.

Until now. The charade is over, whatever is left of it. For the satirical conceit of Iron Mountain, like so many others, has been overtaken by the political phenomena it attacked. I'm referring to those other documents-real ones, and verifiable-that have appeared in print. The Pentagon papers were not written by someone like me. Neither was the Defense Department's Pax Americana study (how to take over Latin America). Nor was the script of Mr. Kissinger's "Special Action Group," reported by Jack Anderson (how to help Pakistan against India while pretending to be neutral).

So far as I know, no one has challenged the authenticity of these examples of high-level strategic thinking. I believe a disinterested reader would agree that sections of them are as outrageous, morally, and intellectually, as any of the Iron Mountain inventions. No, the revelations lay rather in the style of the reasoning-the profound cynicism, the contempt for public opinion. Some of the documents read like parodies of Iron Mountain, rather than the reverse.

These new developments may have helped fuel the debates the book continues to ignite, but they raised a new problem for me. It was that the balance of uncertainty about the book's authorship could "tilt," as Kissinger might say, the other way. (Was that Defense order for 5,000-odd paperbacks, someone might ask, really for routine distribution to overseas libraries-or was it for another, more sinister, purpose?) I'm glad my own Special Defense Contingency Plan included planting two nonexistent references in the book's footnotes to help me prove, if I ever have to, that the work is fictitious.

jofortruth

Posted: May 29 2007, 06:41 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

The book "The Creature from Jekyll Island" has a section on Iron Mountain, and it reveals the same info. (starting on pg 516 - 536) He covers this doc extensively. Below are excerpts:

QUOTE

Origination of Document:

* Think-tank study released in 1966.

* Origin of report is highly debated, however the document itself hints that it was commissioned by the Dept of Defense, Robert McNamara, and was produced by the Hudson Institute located at the base of Iron Mountain in Croton-on-Hudson, New York.

* Hudson Institute was founded by Herman Kahn formerly of the RAND Corporation. (Both McNamara and Kahn were CFR members)

Purpose of the Study:

* Self-proclaimed purpose of the study was to explore various ways to "stabilize society". However, they use the word "society" synonymously with "government". The word "stabilize" is used as meaning to "preserve" and to "perpetuate".

* The nature of the study was to analyze the different ways a government can perpetuate itself in power, ways to control its citizens and prevent them from rebelling.

* Stated in the report that "morality" was not an issue. It didn't address any of the following: right or wrong, freedom or human rights, ideology, patriotism, or religious precepts. It's sole concern was "how to perpetuate the existing government".

QUOTE

Discusses a Suitable Substitute for War:

* The report concludes there can be no substitute for war UNLESS it possesses three properties. It must:

1) Be economically wasteful.

2) Represent a credible threat of great magnitude

3) Provide a logical excuse for compulsory service to the government.

QUOTE

Talks about Compulsory Service:

* One of the advantages of standing armies is that they provide a place for the government to put "antisocial and dissident elements of society".

* In the absence of war, these forced-labor battalions would be told they are:

1) Fighting poverty.

2) Cleaning up the planet.

3) Bolstering the economy.

4) Or serving the common good in some other fashion.

* Every teenager would be required to serve - especially during those years in which young people are most rebellious against authority.

* Older people, too, would be drafted as a means of working off tax payments and fines.

* Dissidents would face heavy fines for "hate crimes" and politically incorrect attitudes.

(Examples: A variant of the Peace Corps or Job Corps)

QUOTE

Discussed Distracting the Public with various activities and entertainment

* The report considered ways in which the public could be preoccupied with non-important activities so thata it would not have time to participate in political debate or resistance.

(Examples: recreation, trivial game shows, pornography, situation comedies, blood games, etc. Do you remember the 1985 european Belgium soccer riots where 38 were killed an scores were injured? How many times do you sit in front of the boob tube to be entertained, and never watch what your Congressman or leaders are doing or get involved? YOU'RE BEING DUPED AMERICA, AND SO BADLY THAT YOUR COUNTRY IS NOW STRUGGLING FOR SURVIVAL BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T DONE OUR JOB OF OVERSIGHT OF OUR LEADERS!)

QUOTE

Discusses Finding a Credible Global Threat:

* "Therefore, a new enemy must be found that threatens the entire world, and the prospects of being overcome by that enemy must be just as terrifying as war itself."

* "A Global Enemy"

* "Credibility would be more important than truth".��

Ideas that discussed to be used for this GLOBAL ENEMY:

1) POVERTY: Most of the world was already in poverty, so only those who had never experienced poverty would see it as a global threat.

2) INVASION BY ALIENS FROM OUTERSPACE: This was given serious consideration. However, the threat was not "credible" back in 1966. However, today some people do believe in other "life forms" and with the use of high tech computer graphics or laser shows in the sky, this could be used to stampede all nations into WORLD GOVERNMENT.

3) ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION MODEL (pg 522) - The final candidate for a useful global threat was pollution of the environment. THIS WAS VIEWED AS THE MOST LIKELY TO SUCCEED because it could be related to observable conditions such as smog and water pollution - in other words, it would be based partly on fact, and therefore would be "CREDIBLE".

"Predictions could be made showing end-of-earth scenarios just as horrible as atomic warfare. Accuracy in these predictions would not be important. Their purpose would be to FRIGHTEN, NOT TO INFORM. It might even be necessary to deliberately poison the environment to make the predictions more convincing and to focus the public mind on fighting a new enemy, more fearful than any invader from another nation - or even from outer space."

"The masses would more willingly accept a falling standard of living, tax increases, and bureaucratic intervention in their lives as simply "THE PRICE WE MUST PAY TO SAVE MOTHER EARTH."

A massive battle against death and destruction from global pollution possibly could replace war as justification for social control."

QUOTE

Authenticity of the Report:

* Special study group of 15 men (names kept secret)

* One person in the group gave his copy to an author/columnist Leonard Lewin, and he negotiated its publication by Dial Press. It was later reprinted by Dell Publishing.

* This was during the Johnson administration and his special assistant was Walt Rostow (look this guy up, he's very controversial). Interestingly, after this was published, Rostow was quick to announce it was a spurious work.

* Herman Kahn, Hudson Institute, said it was not authentic. (Yet his institute wrote it?)

* The Washington Post (Katherine Graham a gatekeeper) called it "a delightful satire"

* Time Magazine (another gatekeeper founded by Henry Luce another CFR member) said it was "a skillful hoax".

* In Nov 1967, the book was reviewed by Herschel McLandress (aka John Kenneth Galbraith) and he said he knew of it firsthand because he was invited to participate in the report.

So, who wrote it? The possible list: 1) Leonard Lewin, 2) Herman Kahn, 3) John Kenneth Galbraith, 4) Dean Rusk - Defense Dept, 5) Clare Booth Luce, 6) William F. Buckley.

In the final analysis, it makes no different who wrote it. The important point is that it EXPLAINS THE REALITY THAT SURROUNDS US TODAY.

So many things that otherwise are incomprehensible suddenly become clear like:

1) Foreign aid

2) Wasteful spending

3) Destruction of American industry

4) A Job Corps

5) Gun Control (UN Disarmament & DC gun case in Supreme Court now, etc)

6) National Police Force (UN MJTF - Multi-Jurisdictional Task Force)
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardt...omegafile33.htm

7) Apparent demise of Soviet power

8) A UN Army

9) Disarmament

10) A World Bank

11) A World Money

12) Surrender of National independence through TREATIES (NAFTA, CAFTA, GATT, etc etc)

13) Ecology hysteria (Crazy Environmental Groups being used as dupes by the elite and haven't a clue they're being used)

THE REPORT IS AN ACCURATE SUMMARY OF THE PLAN THAT HAS ALREADY CREATED OUR PRESENT. IT IS NOT SHAPING OUR FUTURE.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
More on "The Creature From Jekyll" here:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...wtopic=178&st=0

jofortruth

Posted: Jun 15 2007, 01:41 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

Who is Spearheading this Political Agenda?

QUOTE

The environmental movement was hijacked by the banking cartel. Instead of staying focused on scientific study of conservation, it became a catch-all for a radical political agenda, now spearheaded by ex-KGB chief Mikhail Gorbachev and his Western banker colleague Stephen Rockefeller.

(pg 60 "Police State Road Map")

See more on Gorbachev here:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...?showtopic=5548

jofortruth

Posted: May 28 2008, 02:00 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

In "The Creature of Jekyll Island" it also refers to this book:

1991 book entitled "The First Global Revolution" by Club of Rome

QUOTE

"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill... All these dangers are caused by human intervention .... THE REAL ENEMY, then, is HUMANITY ITSELF."

THE TARGET NOW PEOPLE IS HUMANITY.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The First Global Revolution:
http://green-agenda.com/globalrevolution.html
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...?showtopic=8245

jofortruth	Posted: May 28 2008, 02:04 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,704 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	New Definition of Peace:Peace now = TOTAL DISARMAMENT. In the near future PEACE will = SOCIALISM & TOTAL CONTROL OF THE PEOPLE So will they use the isolated (could have been manipulated) attacks at the University of Virginia, etc. as an excuse to dissolve our 2nd Amendment Rights? You can already see something like this happening as the DC Gun Case is currently in the Supreme Court awaiting a decision soon. 2 + 2 = 4

jofortruth

Posted: Jun 19 2008, 01:10 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

More Excerpts from the book - I found a copy at a Used Bookstore: (Remember! This was written by 15 men in 1967, in secret, from supposedly brillant Think Tanks such as Hudson and Rand. You decide just how brilliant they are!)

QUOTE

Page 34:

It is often necessry for a National military establishment to create a need for its unique powers - to maintain the franchise, so to speak.

... this requires regular "exercise" to prevent atrophy.

QUOTE

Non Military Functions of War:

1) Economic

2) Political

3) Sociological

4) Ecological

5) Cultural and Scientific

6) Other

QUOTE

Economic - Starting at Page 35

1) Control of surpluses

2) Creates artficial demand

3) War operates "outside" of the economy of supply & demand

4) Without a long-established war economy, and without its frequent eruption into large-scale shooting war, most of the major industrial advances known to history, begin with the development of Iron, could never have taken place.

5) War spending, considered pragmatically, has been a consistently positive factor in the rise of GNP (Gross National Product) and of individual productivity.

6) The fundamental nonmilitary utility of war in the economy is far more widely acknowledged.

7) Effect of "peace threats" on the stock market.

8) Although we do not imply that a substitute for war in the economy cannot be devised, no combination of techniques for controlling employment, production, and consumption has yet been tested that can remotely compare to it in effectiveness. It is, and has been, the essential economic stabilizer of modern societies!

(Oh! is this why our sons and daughers die in contrived wars?)

QUOTE

Political - Starting at Page 38

1) Critical to social stability.

2) These functions are essentially organizational. First of all, the existence of a society as a political nation requires as part of its definition an attitude of relationship toward other "nations" - A FOREIGN POLICY. But a nation's foreign policy can have no substance if it lacks the means of enforcing its attitude toward other nations.

(SOUNDS LIKE OUR FOREIGN POLICY NEEDS CHANGING!)

3) We have used the word "peace" as virtually synonymous with "disarmament". By the same token, "war" is virtually synonymous with "nationhood". The elimination of war implies the inevitable elimination of national sovereignty and the traditional nation-state.

(How about using another Dictionary guys! This is absurd!)

4) The possibility of war provides the sense of external necessity without which no government can long remain in power.

(So, it's all about Power? Thought so!)

5) The basic authority of a modern state over its people resides in its war powers. There is, in fact, good reason to believe that codified law had its origin in the rules of conduct established by military victors for dealing with the defeated enemy, which were later adapted to apply to all subject populations.

(Did you get that? "subject populations" and "basic authority of a modern state over its people"? Who do these guys think they are? Do they forget we live in a Republic which is of WE THE PEOPLE?)

6) The war system has served as the last great safeguard against the elimination of necessary social classes. As even productivity increases to a level further above that of minimum subsistence, it becomes more and more difficult for a society to maintain distribution patterns insuring the existence of "hewers of wood and drawers of water". The further progress of automation can be expected to differentiate still more sharply between "superior" workers and "menials" while aggravating the problem of maintaining an unskilled labor supply.

(Who were these ELITE men who could write such a heartless study report? Do they have no soul?)

7) Obviously, if the War System were to be discarded, new political machinery would be needed at once to serve this vital subfunction. Until it is developed, the continuance of the war system must be assured, if for no other reason, among others, than to preserve whatever quality and degree of poverty a society requires as an incentive, as well as to maintain the stability of its internal organization of power.

(So poverty is contrived also, as a means of STABILITY?)

QUOTE

Sociological - Starts on Page 41:

1) To provide antisocial elements with an acceptable role inthe social structure. The disintegrative, unstable social movements loosely described as "fascist" have traditionally taken root in societies that have lacked adequate military or paramilitary outlets to meet the needs of these elements.

(OH! You've got it wrong. The "fascists" are those who suppress their people, and who when the people rebel are treated as the enemies, when all they're rightfully doing is fighting for their rights. You're thinking is so illogical!)

2) The socially disaffected of the post WWII period ... these hostile social groupings have been kept under control by the Selective Service System.

(Oh, so we have the worst of the worst serving beside others in our military who are good people? Now that's comforting! Why don't you guys come up with a better solution for handling these individuals. This is not the outlet.)/COLOR]�

3) [COLOR=red]Informed persons in this country have never accepted the official rationale for a peacetime draft.

(So, folks, this means we all need to become INFORMED, because if you don't these totally irrational ELITES will make decisions for you, like what is being written in this treatise.)

4) It must be noted also that the armed forces in every civilization have provided the principal state-supported haven for what we now call the "unemployable" .... Led by officers unfit to practice any legitimate profession.

(So, men and women of our military, this is how you are perceived by these self-righteous ELITES, many of whom have probably never served in the military. This is totally condescending!)

5) The war system ... the critical point is that the enemy that defines the cause must seem genuinely formidable... Today, of course, that power must be one of unprecedented magnitude and frightfulness.

(So what set in after 911? An unprecedented fear on American soil. So, what are the ELITE trying to accomplish while we all cower in our Fear that they manipulated? When you read such arrogant writings as this book and see how they think of US, you can't help but see how they will do anything to KEEP CONTROL OF THE PEOPLE. TIME TO WAKE UP PEOPLE!)

6) What gives the war system its preeminent role in social organization is its unmatched authority over life and death.

7) The book goes on to discuss ancient civilizations and how the blood sacrifice was used and how the ritual was invested in mythic or religious significance.

(Oh! So are some still using the Blood Sacrifice today?)

QUOTE

Ecological - Starting on Page 47

1) To forestall the inevitable historical cycles of inadequate food supply, post-neolithic man destroys surplus members of his own species by organized warfare.

2) Or it may follow the dramatic and more efficient pattern of lemming societies, in which the weaker members voluntarily disperse, leaving food supplies for the stronger.

(How arrogant!)

3) In human societies, those who fight and die in wars for survival are in general its biologically stronger members. This is Natural Selection in reverse!

4) Survival of the species, rather than its improvement, is the fundamental purpose of Natural Selection ... just as it is the basic premise of this study.

(Oh! So this study is about Natural Selection and Science, rather than humanity? I guess I would have to agree on this one! You guys were amazing, and this is not in a good way!)�

5) Talks about population growth, environmental threats of chemicals and other contaminants, and then goes on to say they may well bring about a new crisis of insufficiency. If so, it is likely to be one of unprecedented global magnitude.

(So, is this why we're seeing all the Environmental fearmongering lately? Is this your replacement for War? Controlling the masses through Fear, just in another realm?)

6) .... to reduce the consuming population to a level consistent with survival of the species.

(What, are we animals that are disposable? Who gave you the right to decide who lives and who dies?)

7) The book talks about modern methods of mass destruction, and how they could be used to meet a world population crisis or halt the regressive genetic effects of natural selection by war.

(Are these men totally sick? Or just plain evil? This is talking about EUGENICS people.)

8) The problem of increased life expectancy has been aggravated by medical advances. It goes on to say how undesirable genetic traits that were formerly self-liquidated are now medically maintained and lends to our population problem.

(There are no words to describe the mentality of these sick men.)

9) ... a new quasi-eugenic function of war ... Planning under way by the RAND CORPORATION.

(So, now we know the real reason the RAND CORPORATION exists; to help promote inhumane and ridiculous studies like this?)

QUOTE

Cultural and Scientific - Starting on Page 52

1) It is no accident that the current "cultural explosion" in the US is taking place during an ear marked by an unusally rapid advance in weaponry.

2) No important scientific advance has not been at least indirectly initiated by an implicit requirement of weaponry (Examples: iron, steel, laws of motion, radios, assembly lines, space capsul, atomic particle, etc).

QUOTE

Other - Starting on Page 54:

1) War as a general social release.

2) War as a generational stabilizer

(So, is this why we have wars periodically, just to stabilize us?)

3) War as an ideological clarifier.

(Can you say the Neocon mentality? Their line of thought was certainly not that of many Americans.)

4) War as the basis for inter-national understanding.

(Oh! We use guns to create understanding? How ridiculous is that?)

jofortruth

Posted: Jun 19 2008, 02:47 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

QUOTE

Substitutes for the Functions of War - Starting on Page 57

1) ... master plan for a transition to world peace will remain academic if it fails to deal forthrightly with the problem of the critical nonmilitary functions of war. The social needs they serve are essential. Any surrogates must be "realistic".

2) It may be, for instance, that gross pollution of the environment can eventually replace the possibility of mass destruction by nuclear weapons as the principal apparent threat to the survival of the species. Poisoning of the air, and of the principal sources of food and water supply, is already well advanced, and at first glance would seem promising in this respect; it constitutes a threat that can be dealt with only through social organization and political power.

3) But from present indications it will be a generation to a generation and a half before environmental pollution, however severe, will be menacing, on a global scale, to offer a possible basis for a solution.

(Note: This was written in 1967. A generation is approx. 25 years, so 1 1/2 generations is 40 years, placing us at the year of 2007. Have you noticed "all things environment" being talked about? It's as if the ELITE are taking their ideas directly from this very illconceived book.)

(Another opinion - A generation is 30 years, so 1991 would be the date. If you will remember, George HW Bush started using the words NWO in his 1990 speech.)

jofortruth	Posted: Oct 20 2008, 01:14 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,704 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Global Warming Pre-Arranged - In Iron Mountain: (Correlates to pg 51, 52 in Scribd doc above)

jofortruth	Posted: Feb 18 2009, 03:31 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,704 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07

jofortruth	Posted: Sep 4 2009, 03:35 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,704 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?to...99943#msg799943 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77ayxuXo6uM (See Time 0:04 lady carrying box) Is this just a thumbing in our faces? Who knows, but these guys are sick this way! Attached Image (Click thumbnail to expand)

jofortruth

Posted: Oct 19 2009, 01:23 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

Oh, and look what the Club of Rome said:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...?showtopic=7438
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...?showtopic=8245

QUOTE

�The common enemy of humanity is man.� In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.� ...The real enemy then is humanity itself. Democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead.�

�From the Club of Rome�s �The First Global Revolution� p. 71,75 1993

jofortruth	Posted: Nov 8 2009, 04:25 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,704 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Iron Mountain Recommendation #3: Mandatory Universal Healthcare http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA0dwXElZ5o Healthcare Bill Passed the House 11-7-09: http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...opic=6858&st=50 THE PLANS OF THIS BOOK ARE BEING PLAYED OUT BEFORE OUR EYES! YOU MUST READ THIS, AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTIONS TO EDUCATE YOUR CONGRESSMEN, AND LOCAL LEADERS. THIS IS REAL FOLKS! IT IS HAPPENING NOW!

jofortruth

Posted: Nov 24 2009, 12:30 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,704
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

See pg 55, 56 where it talks about War and Eugenics:

QUOTE

"... excess population is war material"

"War controls the general population level."

"Since the eugenic solution cannot be achieved until the transition to the peace system takes place, why not wait?

Report From Iron Mountain: On The Possibility of Peace

Publish at Scribd or explore others: School Work Other Non-fiction report Iron Mountain

See more on Iron Mountain: (pg 66,67 I show in this thread correlate to pg 51, 52 in the above pdf. PLEASE READ!)
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...hp?showtopic=14

jofortruth	Posted: Mar 13 2011, 10:09 AM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,704 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Global Warming Hoax, Planned in 1961 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvcuylMrkXk

jofortruth	Posted: Apr 8 2012, 06:35 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,704 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Bob Fletcher on AJ 3-28-12 on Iron Mountain Report: (The Report is real) http://rss.infowars.com/20120328_Wed_Alex.mp3 http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=9856.0

jofortruth	Posted: Apr 11 2012, 03:11 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,704 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Watch this 2012 video, then read "The Report from Iron Mountain". This old book stated, back in the 1960's, they would use an alien threat and environmental scare to usher in their New World Order: http://www.infowars.com/mars-attacks-milit...o-fight-aliens/ Alien Invasion: US Military Prepare For Attack 2012 http://youtu.be/v6aUrqSagog Everything happening today was planned decades ago! This is more proof! Will they try to use the Alien Hoax in America? They are desperate because we are not believing anything else they're trying: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?to...3423#msg1113423

jofortruth	Posted: May 22 2013, 09:05 AM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,704 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	HAVE YOU NOT READ THIS BOOK YET? LOOK AROUND YOU TODAY. IT IS HAPPENING!

jofortruth	Posted: May 22 2013, 09:10 AM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,704 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Out of a Chapter of "The Creature from Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin http://www.scribd.com/doc/4905342/Report-from-Iron-Mountain Report from Iron Mountain

0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

« Next Oldest | New World Order (NWO) / Globalization / (See Freemasonry under Religion/Cults) | Next Newest »

DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you