Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Welcome to The Great Deception. We hope you enjoy your visit.
You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


Pages: (3) [1] 2 3  ( Go to first unread post )

 Chemtrails - Geoengineering Planet! Govt Admits, More Evidence this is happening!
jofortruth
  Posted: May 22 2007, 01:14 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Chemtrails - Shield Project - Secret Project Spraying our Skies
http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/shieldproject.html


David Stewart on Chemtrails:
http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/stewart.html

Lawrence Livermore National Lab:
http://www.llnl.gov/


VIDEO: What in the World are they Spraying:
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/953/774/The...y_Spraying.html

What in The World Are They Spraying? from WNT - World News Television on Vimeo.



Flyer:
http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/p...ITWATSflyer.pdf

---------------------------------------------------------------
Chemtrails, Geoengineering, Weather Warfare:
http://www.4shared.com/video/q1DqjXssce/Ch...ering_Weat.html

12 DOCUMENTS YOU SHOULD DOWNLOAD ON THIS SUBJECT:
http://www.4shared.com/office/14_R6lt8ba/1...Chemtrails.html
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jun 13 2007, 08:48 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Chemtrails - Toxic Sky - Videos (Is govt experimenting with weather?)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sm6rbwVUxGU

Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jun 13 2007, 08:51 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jun 13 2007, 08:52 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Chemtrail ‘Sunscreen’ Taught In US Schools?
http://peeringintodarkness.com/ctd/?p=4756
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Oct 2 2007, 01:12 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Chemtrails - Uk Govt Admits - Not Their Policy 2, Discuss Ongoing Research - They say! (OHHHHH?????)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VLNNwiKvlE...howtopic%3D9383


Top
jofortruth
Posted: Nov 16 2007, 12:42 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Chemtrails & Human Experimentation by US Government - 1994 Veterans Affairs Report & More:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okB-489l6MI

QUOTE
SHREVEPORT, LA - CHEMTRAILS: Is U.S. Gov't. Secretly Testing Americans 'Again'?

Posted: Nov 9, 2007 07:46 PM EST
Could a strange substance found by an Ark-La-Tex man be part of secret government testing program? That's the question at the heart of a phenomenon called "Chemtrails." In a KSLA News 12 investigation, Reporter Jeff Ferrell shows us the results of testing we had done about what's in our skies By Jeff Ferrell




Finally, PUBLIC LAW 95-79 [P.L. 95-79] TITLE 50, CHAPTER 32, SECTION 1520 "CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM" "The use of human subjects will be allowed for the testing of chemical and biological agents by the U.S. Department of Defense, accounting to Congressional committees with respect to the experiments and studies." "The Secretary of Defense [may] conduct tests and experiments involving the use of chemical and biological [warfare] agents on civilian populations [within the United States]." -SOURCE- Public Law 95-79, Title VIII, Sec. 808, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 334. In U.S. Statutes-at-Large, Vol. 91, page 334, you will find Public Law 95-79. Public Law 97-375, title II, Sec. 203(a)(1), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1882. In U.S. Statutes-at-Large, Vol. 96, page 1882, you will find Public Law 97-375
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?c...2100&query_hl=2
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Nov 16 2007, 12:52 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



HISTORY OF SECRET EXPERIMENTATION ON UNITED STATES CITIZENS
http://www.israelect.com/reference/WillieM...Experiments.htm

Book: "Undue Risk: Secret State Experiments on Humans" by Jonathan Moreno:
http://www.amazon.com/Undue-Risk-Secret-Ex...s/dp/0415928354


CFR - Foreign Affairs Publication even Mentions this: (As if they didn't know) rolleyes.gif
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20000301fabo...-on-humans.html
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Nov 16 2007, 01:02 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



BBC - US Admits Chemical Weapons Tests
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2315081.stm


CNN - Pentagon: Chem Bio Tests Involved US Troops
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/05/23/pentagon.chem.bio/
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Nov 16 2007, 01:07 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Kucinich - HR 2977 - The Space Preservation Act of 2001
http://www.rense.com/general19/ex.htm
http://contrailscience.com/kucinich-chemtrails-and-hr-2977/
http://kucinich.house.gov/News/DocumentSin...ocumentID=28615

Kucinich, Chemtrails and HR 2977 (Original Version)

QUOTE
One of the more pervasive myths regarding chemtrails is that current presidential candidate Dennis Kuchinich tried to have them banned by an act of congress, but was pressured by the government to modify the act to remove mention of chemtrails.

So what really happened? In a nutshell, Kucinich did not write the bill (or read it, until too late), the focus of the bill is nothing to do with chemtrails, it was written by UFO enthusiasts trying to: A) nullify a conspiracy by the military-industrial complex, B) allow the use of suppressed alien technology for free energy, and C) avoid accidentally shooting down or scaring away visiting aliens. They listed a bunch of weird weapons, including mind control, tectonic weapons and (very briefly) chemtrails. The bill was re-written several time in less unusual language to give it chance of passing, but ultimately fizzled in committee.

The specific act was HR 2977, the Space Preservation Act of 2001, the stated goal of which was:

To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.

The initial version of the act is the only one that makes mention of ¡°exotic weapons systems, listing several technologies that will be familiar to conspiracy theorists:

(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;
(ii) chemtrails;
(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;
(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;
(v) laser weapons systems;
(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and
(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.

Yes, it even includes extraterrestrial weapons, meaning weapons created by aliens (or created from alien technology from crashed flying saucers at Roswell), as well as psychotronic (mind control) weapons. Yet somehow chemtrails gets all the attention here.

Who wrote this? The original language for the bill was actually created by an organization called the Institute For Cooperation In Space, an organization whose primary purpose is to promote adoption of the Space Preservation Act. The ICIS states on its web site in part:

Humanity is on the threshold of a quantum leap in consciousness and endeavor. We must now take action to preserve this grand opportunity by preventing the weaponization of space.

We have a critical choice to explore the great unknown of outer space or to risk continued suffering and disasters, devastation or obliteration. We can rise above different perspectives and actions that didn't, don't, and won't cause second order change, actions that recognize our high consciousness and human potential applied with out-of-the-box thinking and intention to cause second order change, or we can continue the status quo of protesting the old and accepting the same that would only lead us to more violence instead of peace.

The whole site has a very new-age feel to it. Seemingly if only this act is passed, the military-industrial complex will turn from its warlike ways, and humanity will enter a new age of cooperation, progress and raised consciousness. The rationale for a weapons ban is never clearly explained. Nor is it explained why having weapons in space will prevent normal research and exploration of space. Obviously we would all like to see less deadly weapons floating over our heads, but is a total ban vital to the next stage of human evolution? ICIS seems to think so.

Indeed, when you talk about things in simple terms, an international ban on weapons in space¡± sounds like a great idea. Like a ban on chemical weapons, it saves money and makes the world a safer place. So it's not hard to get people to support such a ban.

The face of the ICIS, is Carol Rosin, who, together with co-founder Alfred Webre, was the architect of the original version of the bill. Rosin claims that in 1974 rocket scientist Werner Von Braun told her ¡°Carol, you will stop the weaponization of space¡±, and described to her a vast conspiracy by the military-industrial complex to raise a series of fears to justify space-based weapons. Since then, Rosin has dedicated her life to exposing this conspiracy, and allowing humanity to expand it's consciousness into space. Here's a video of her explaining this.





QUOTE
The video shows Rosin speaking at The Disclosure Project, an organization working to disclose the facts about UFOs, extraterrestrial intelligence, and classified advanced energy and propulsion systems. Rosin herself only briefly touches on this in her speech, but it is clear she believes that the government has alien technology, and is withholding it from the people.The other board members on the ICIS are co-founder Alfred Webre, Brian O'Leary and Daniel Sheehan, all of whom are deeply involved with The Disclosure Project. So what's Kucinich¡'s involvement in this? It's difficult to say. Kucinich is anti-war, so perhaps that's his motivation. He does have a lot of new-age, UFO-believing, friends, but he's also running for president. When he was made aware of the nature of the exotic weapons language in the bill, it was re-written, and when questioned about it, he said

I'm not into that. Understand me. When I found out that was in there, I said, "Look, I'm not interested in going there.

Kucinich's motivations are perhaps revealed by his speech to the house on May 18th, 2005, introducing a newer version of the bill:

What has happened to our country? Why are we projecting fear and paranoia to such heights? Have we so lost our way and our faith that we are prepared to transform the heavens into hell? If the kingdom and the will of God is to be done on earth as it is in heaven, what is to happen when the United States takes nuclear fire up to the gates of heaven? Such an offense against humanity could bring the wrath of God upon this nation.

So Kucinich thinks that space based weapons will offend God, since space is close to heaven, and if you put nuclear weapons near heaven then God will be offended and bring his wrath against us.

If you actually ARE a conspiracy theorist, then all this will come as little surprise to you. You will already believe the government is covering up technology based on crashed UFOs. Yet HR2977 is constantly being mentioned solely to make the case that chemtrails are something the government is aware of. The reality is that they were simply given a passing mention in bill written by new-age UFO conspiracy theorists and sponsored by an eccentric politician, all of who believe in things that are far more unusual than chemtrails.

Saturday 19 May 2007
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Nov 16 2007, 02:04 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



QUOTE
Forward of Report
103d Congress, 2d Session - COMMITTEE PRINT - S. Prt. 103-97
IS MILITARY RESEARCH HAZARDOUS TO VETERANS' HEALTH?
LESSONS SPANNING HALF A CENTURY

A STAFF REPORT PREPARED FOR THE
COMMITTEE ON VETERANS' AFFAIRS

UNITED STATES SENATE
DECEMBER 8, 1994

JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia, Chairman

DENNIS DeCONCINI, Arizona
GEORGE J. MITCHELL, Maine
BOB GRAHAM, Florida
DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii
THOMAS A. DASCHLE, South Dakota FRANK H. MURKOWSKI, Alaska
STROM THURMOND, South Carolina
ALAN K. SIMPSON, Wyoming
ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania
JAMES M. JEFFORDS, Vermont

BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SO THESE ARE YOUR CONGRESSMEN WHO KNEW THIS WAS GOING ON, AND SOME ARE STILL IN CONGRESS.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINDINGS:

III. Findings and conclusions

* A. For at least 50 years, DOD has intentionally exposed military personnel to potentially dangerous substances, often in secret

* B. DOD has repeatedly failed to comply with required ethical standards when using human subjects in military research during war or threat of war

* C. DOD incorrectly claims that since their goal was treatment, the use of investigational drugs in the Persian Gulf War was not research

* D. DOD used investigational drugs in the Persian Gulf War in ways that were not effective

* E. DOD did not know whether pyridostigmine bromide would be safe for use by U.S. troops in the Persian Gulf War

* F. When U.S. troops were sent to the Persian Gulf in 1994, DOD still did not have proof that pyridostigmine bromide was safe for use as an antidote enhancer

* G. Pyridostigmine may be more dangerous in combination with pesticides and other exposures

* H. The safety of the botulism vaccine was not established prior to the Persian Gulf War

* I. Records of anthrax vaccinations are not suitable to evaluate safety

* J. Army regulations exempt informed consent for volunteers in some types of military research

* K. DOD and DVA have repeatedly failed to provide information and medical follow-up to those who participate in military research or are ordered to take investigational drugs

* L. The Federal Government has failed to support scientific studies that provide information about the reproductive problems experienced by veterans who were intentionally exposed to potentially dangerous substances

* M. The Federal Government has failed to support scientific studies that provide timely information for compensation decisions regarding military personnel who were harmed by various exposures

* N. Participation in military research is rarely included in military medical records, making it impossible to support a veteran's claim for service-connected disabilities from military research

* O. DOD has demonstrated a pattern of misrepresenting the danger of various military exposures that Senate Report 103-97
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Nov 16 2007, 02:56 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Human Experimentation: An Overview on Co1d War Era Programs
http://archive.gao.gov/t2pbat2/152601.pdf

QUOTE
We are pleased to be here today to discuss the use of humans in tests and experiments conducted for national security purposes by the Department of Defense and other agencies between 1940 - 1974.
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Nov 30 2007, 11:32 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Chemtrails Mystery Lines in the Sky:
http://www.thelastoutpost.com/site/1471/default.aspx


Document: Weather as A Force Multiplier Owning the Weather in 2025
http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/usa...c15/v3c15-1.htm

Senate Testimony on May 6, 1994:
http://www.rense.com/ufo5/spray.htm
Top
Joann
Posted: Jan 15 2008, 03:47 PM


Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 1,422
Member No.: 3
Joined: 2-May 07



Chemtrail Update

Military aircraft spraying of chaff used to deflect radar is understandable during an attack situation, however, why do they need to disperse chaff when flying over the US and other countries at peace time?
_________________

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=222_1200191568

QUOTE
Weatherman Explains Chemtrails on Radar

This video is extremely important in exposing these mind control nut jobs of the mainstream media. Here we have an Anchorman/Weather Man explaining in detail Chaff that is ejected from Military aircraft

This is a great cover for Chemtrails. Why is this Anchorman/Weather Man telling us about so called military Chaff/Chemtrails? Do we need anymore proof? Chaff is also toxic, it's a no win pollution situation!
QUOTE
Chaff Detected by NWS Louisville Radar

It has been documented in the past, particularly in western states, that NWS NEXRAD radar can detect chaff. What is that you ask? Chaff is a radar countermeasure used by military aircraft consisting of very small pieces of metal such as aluminum. It can appear as narrow bands of reflectivity on the radar since they are dispersed by planes flying at high speeds along a path.

During the afternoon hours of 7 January 2006, the Louisville NEXRAD radar (KLVX) detected what appeared to be chaff. The day was mostly clear, with only a few high level cirrus clouds. Winds at the surface were out of the southwest, but higher up near the level the chaff was detected, winds were out of the west-northwest. The echoes presented here are somewhat weaker than normal, topping out around 16 dBz or so.
QUOTE
Progression of Chemtrails in NH

My own video made in Southern NH 5-7-07. I've been observing the skies every day, and suggest you do the same. The more aware you are- the more you happen to notice. I've gone out everyday and have seen chemtrails in the sky almost every day! It's disgusting. Are you tired of those grey or white skies? Well... they're not all made by nature. Which means they can be stopped. You CAN do something about them. Some analysis of these chemtrails have allegedly shown traces of Barium, Aluminum and other harmful metals and toxins. There are many reports of illnesses in all areas where chemtrails are...mainly upper respiratory problems, nose bleeds, headaches and dizziness. This is not conspiracy- this has been going on since 1996. This is a GLOBAL issue...not just the US. Do some research and check it out for yourself. Just type in some keywords in your browser- such as chemtrails, persistant contrails, choose any country and do it. Type in 'Chemtrails in Europe', or 'Chemtrails in India'
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 10 2009, 08:42 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Obama’s Plan To “Geo-Engineer” The Planet Mirrors CFR Policy Documents
http://www.prisonplanet.com/obamas-plan-to...-documents.html
http://www.prisonplanet.com/concerns-about...sh-impetus.html
http://www.cfr.org/project/1364/geoengineering.html

Well, well! It's about time they are admitting it. They've been doing this for years. Many have been reporting seeing these chem trails in the sky over decades. Like everything else, they report things to the "slaves" ONLY AFTER THEY HAVE TO, and after they've been doing it for years.



nonono.gif


http://www.4shared.com/video/q1DqjXssce/Ch...ering_Weat.html

12 DOCUMENTS YOU SHOULD DOWNLOAD ON THIS SUBJECT:
http://www.4shared.com/office/14_R6lt8ba/1...Chemtrails.html

Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 12 2009, 11:48 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



How do you like your skies ... Natural or man-made?
http://www.californiaskywatch.com/

Rosalind Peterson was on Alex Jones Show, Thursday April 9, 2009: (Go to Time 3:09:00 to end of show)
http://www.thealexjonesshow.com/show/2009/...9-peterson.html

This lady is an expert on Chemtrails, Weather Modification, and all the whacko Geoengineering Scientists who are playing god with our skies. Many are from STANFORD (not surprising). A good presentation. Please listen!


She encourages people to contact her and give her research they find on this topic: (Google search on weather modification, chemtrails, aerial spraying, etc)
http://www.californiaskywatch.com/contact.htm

Her Geoengineering Page:
http://www.californiaskywatch.com/document...engineering.htm

She said she attended a meeting at Stanford November 2006 of all of the Geoengineering gods rolleyes.gif and she was one of only a few who questioned what they were saying. She would ask questions like how it would affect people, crops, our trees, our water, etc to have our skies being pumped full of chemicals and things they used to CONTROL THE WEATHER (aka Weather Modification experiments, and man made clouds, etc). These weirdos actually got mad at her questions probably because SHE DIDN'T BUY INTO THEIR MAD SCIENTIST CRAP OF MANIPULATING OUR WEATHER!

I see chemtrails all the time, and so do many other people. These idiots are playing god with our skies just like everything else!


teach.gif

Obama's Plan to Geo-Engineer the Planet Mirrors CFR Policy Documents:
http://www.infowars.net/articles/april2009/090409CFR.htm
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?em05njttjvy

QUOTE
A CFR geo-engineering meeting summary document from 1999 (PDF pages 12,13,14) also categorically states that the ultimate goal under "A technology strategy for global warming" is the implementation of a global Carbon Tax.


DO YOU SEE WHO CONTROLS YOUR PRESIDENT? HE IS GOING ALONG WITH WHATEVER THE GLOBALISTS AND CFR WANT. HE'S BUT ANOTHER PUPPET SITTING IN THE WHITE HOUSE WORKING FOR THE WRONG PEOPLE. WHAT A WEAK MAN HE AND GEORGE BUSH HAVE BEEN TO CAVE IN TO THE ELITE! BOTH WORK FOR THE ELITE GLOBALISTS AS SEEN BY THEIR STUPID AND NWO POLICIES BEING INVOKED IN BOTH ADMINISTRATIONS AND PREVIOUS ONES ALSO.

I"M TIRED OF WEAK PRESIDENTS WHO CAN'T PUT THEIR COUNTRY FIRST BEFORE THE GLOBALISTS MASTERS THEY SERVE!


angry.gif
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 13 2009, 12:09 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Nov 2006 Geoengineering Meeting at Stanford (Professor Gregory Benford): (This is one of the gods who was promoting these crazy ideas)
http://www.californiaskywatch.com/document...ering_talks.htm
http://www.californiaskywatch.com/document...te_controls.htm

Transcript of Meeting & Podcast:
http://newyorkskywatch.com/climate-enginee...rofit-survival/
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 13 2009, 12:12 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Experimental Weather Modification & Legislation our crazy Congress is passing and has passed regarding this craziness:
http://www.californiaskywatch.com/document...r_mod_bills.htm

QUOTE
Prepare yourself for more water shortages, floods, droughts, and a sharp decline in food supplies in the United States when U.S. Senate Bill 1807 & U.S. House Bill 3445, that were introduced on July 17, 2007, are voted into law.

These identical bills, titled: “Weather Mitigation Research and Development Policy Authorization Act of 2007”, are moving forward at a rapid rate in Committees on Commerce, Science and Transportation. Please note that these bills were not referred to Committees on Agriculture, Natural Resources, the Environmental Protection Agency, or Forestry, and that you were not invited to debate the merits of these bills by your elected representatives.

“It is the purpose of this act to develop and implement a comprehensive and coordinated national weather mitigation policy and a national cooperative Federal and State program of weather mitigation and research.” The Board of Directors will be comprised of eleven members and only one member shall be a representative of the Department of Agriculture. There are no members of the public to be appointed to this Board, no EPA representatives, no Natural Resources or Forestry representatives, and there are no provisions for county, state, public, or agricultural oversight of these programs prior to implementation.



Peterson even said that CAP AND TRADE (Another lie) legislation includes weather mitigation references. CHECK IT OUT! I WILL BE!

You can thank Barbara Boxer for being the fool who Sponsored the Cap and Trade bill: (Why Californians vote this woman in every time is beyond me. She is helping destroy your STATE and COUNTRY!)
http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/...d-trade-system/

Kerry, Boxer: U.S. ‘Needs’ Cap-and-Trade on Carbon Emissions Even if Energy Costs Rise (Kerry is another Globalist sell out)
http://www.cnsnews.com/PUBLIC/content/arti...px?RsrcID=45330
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 13 2009, 12:46 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



CO2 Cap and Trade effectively killed by Thune ® amendment?
http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2009/04/...cap_and_tra.php
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 13 2009, 11:14 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Alex was talking about this the other day. How the US Code says they can't test biological and chemical weapons on the people. However, the same code gives EXCEPTIONS - RESEARCH, etc. So of course they will call it research after decades of doing it!
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/us...=3765&TYPE=TEXT

US CODE - TITLE 50, Chapter 32, Section 1520 (a) (Alex got the section wrong, but it was close enough to help me find it)

QUOTE
From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access
[www.gpoaccess.gov]
[Laws in effect as of January 3, 2006]
[CITE: 50USC1520a]

                   TITLE 50--WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE

           CHAPTER 32--CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM

Sec. 1520a. Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of
        chemical or biological agents
    
(a) Prohibited activities

    The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)--
        (1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent
    or biological agent on a civilian population; or
        (2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on
    human subjects.

(b) Exceptions

    Subject to subsections ©, (d), and (e) of this section, the
prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a test
or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:
        (1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical,
    therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research
    activity.
        (2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against
    toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
        (3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related
    to riot control.



The show where Alex talked about this - Friday, April 10, 2009: (Time 27:26)
http://www.thealexjonesshow.com/show/2009/...1009-black.html
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 15 2009, 03:48 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



SEE ALSO: Weather Modification In Warfare & In General, Cohen speaks of Earthquake weapons
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...topic=6489&st=0
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 16 2009, 12:34 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Carbon Trading - A Critical Conversation on Climate Change, Privatization & Power:
http://d.scribd.com/docs/18gvcs7fx51cikwhb38r.pdf


An excellent discussion on all the groups trying to benefit from the global warming issue. It seems they're focused more on how to ENRICH themselves (so typical of non-leaders who think first of money) then how to deal with the problem, or determining if there is a legitimate problem. Quite interesting!


QUOTE
pg 44: "US scientists have also long contemplated spraying the stratosphere with fine metallic particles to reflect sunlight, perhaps using the engines of commercial jets for the job. Taking unilateral action to dim the sky in this way, explained the late Edward Teller, the father of the hydrogen bomb, is simpler, cheaper alternative to 'international consensus on ... large scale reductions in fossil fuel-based energy production."



AND THEY'RE NOT ONLY TALKING ABOUT IT, BUT HAVE BEEN DOING IT FOR A LONG TIME. JUST LOOK UP IN THE SKY!


More here:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...topic=6526&st=0
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 20 2009, 02:19 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Chemtrails - Battelle Lab Connection? What about bio-weapons?
http://www.battelle.org/


This company is hooked up with:

Pacific NW National Labs
Dept of Homeland Security
Oakridge in Tennessee
Stanford
Dept of Energy

They are said to be the ones spraying our skies with the toxic chemicals. They name it different things, but it is still Chem Trails.

Look into this further. This is my first awareness of it.


Aerosol Operations 2005-Battelle Labs Style
http://www.whale.to/b/splane1.html
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 24 2009, 11:12 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Top
jofortruth
Posted: Apr 29 2009, 07:31 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



ChemTrailing In Halifax Nova Scotia Canada April.27, 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S31Mi9wy_Yk

Top
jofortruth
Posted: May 12 2009, 02:52 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 34,356
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



This is what a chemtrail looks like! Ever seen them? If not, now that you know what they look like, you will!

Most times when I see them, it will be two jets crisscrossing each other. Start being observant. Our skies are being sprayed with chemicals that are not healthy for any human being! So you have to ask yourself, why this is being done! Is there some agenda behind it? That's what we think is happening!

http://www.prisonplanet.com/precipitation-...-campaigns.html



Attached Image (Click thumbnail to expand)
Attached Image
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Environment/Global Warming/Storms/Bio-Terror/Chemtrails/Weather Modification | Next Newest »
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
Learn More · Register Now

Topic OptionsPages: (3) [1] 2 3 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.3368 seconds | Archive