InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums with no limits on posts or members.

Learn More · Register Now
Welcome to The Great Deception. We hope you enjoy your visit.
You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


 

 Canadian Military Quell Staged Protests In Martial, Law Training; Being done everywhere
jofortruth
Posted: May 5 2009, 03:10 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,435
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



QUOTE
Fake explosions and vehicle searches as soldiers patrol city

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Tuesday, May 5, 2009

The Canadian military has taken over a city for three weeks as part of an urban warfare drill that is seeing convoys of tanks rolling down streets, “hollywood” style explosions, and scenarios involving simulated terrorist attacks.

According to one report out of Medicine Hat in Alberta, Canada, the army is also using actors to pose as civilian protesters, who are described as “an environmental insurgency” involved in ” insurgent attacks against the city and military, which the Provincial Reconstruction Team needs to address.”

The picture opposite, showing the army penning in protesters with placards was posted on the Medicine Hat News website yesterday.

“From a public perspective, this portion of the scenario means an increase in patrols and convoys through the city,” the report states.

“Residents may also see soldiers conducting vehicle searches, but this is only for military players in civilian clothing. Soldiers will not interfere with or search citizens’ vehicles. There may be some minor traffic delays in parts of the city. The explosives are not real and personnel are trained in the use of these special effects.”

The ongoing drills, known as “Operation Total Ram“, are officially part of preparations for approximately 300 soldiers set for deployment to Afghanistan in the fall.

Clearly it is unlikely that the soldiers will be confronted by disgruntled environmental protesters in the streets of Kandahar, however.

The following Canadian news report also shows images of civilian “actors” being rounded up into fenced off holding areas:

Operation Total Ram is scheduled to wrap up on May 8.





Many feel that this is only the public reason being given for these types of drills, and what the soldiers are being told. If this is true, then why are these same types of drills going on all over America? Those troops aren't training for Afghanistan, many just came back.

MANY THINK THAT THE REAL REASON FOR THESE DRILLS, IS TO PREPARE FOR GUN CONFISCATION AND THE TOTAL COLLAPSE OF THE AMERICAN ECONOMY WHEN THE NWO BANKERS TOTALLY IMPLODE IT, AND ATTEMPT TO BRING IN THEIR WORLD GOVERNMENT, WORLD BANK, AND CARBON TAXES THAT WILL BE PAID DIRECT TO THE BANKERS. THIS IS ONLY PART OF THE 40+ YEAR PLANS THE NWO ELITE ARE TRYING TO IMPLEMENT, AND THEY'RE NOW DOING IT UNDER THE GUISE OF A BOGUS FLU PANDEMIC. JUST WAIT, THEY WILL PLAY OTHER GAMES TO GET WHAT THEY WANT ALSO.

IN SHORT: THEY ARE PREPARING FOR MARTIAL LAW AND DISARMAMENT.

UNFORTUNATELY, A FEW YEARS AGO, THE US AND CANADA SIGNED AN AGREEMENT TO HELP EACH OTHER MILITARILY IN EMERGENCIES. SO THIS IS REALLY WHY CANADIAN TROOPS ARE HAVING URBAN WARFARE DRILLS!

I DON'T KNOW ABOUT YOU, BUT I'M TIRED OF BEING LIED TO, AND I'M TIRED OF OUR DEDICATED TROOPS BEING LIED TO AS TO ABOUT THEIR MISSIONS! IF ANYTHING, I THINK OUR TROOPS ALONG WITH THE PUBLIC DESERVE BETTER!

CAN SOMEONE START SHOWING SOME LEADERSHIP AND START BEING HONEST?
Top
jofortruth
Posted: May 5 2009, 03:28 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,435
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Canada, U.S. agree to use each other’s troops in civil emergencies
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.ht...ef-902a1d14879d

QUOTE
Canada and the U.S. have signed an agreement that paves the way for the militaries from either nation to send troops across each other’s borders during an emergency, but some are questioning why the Harper government has kept silent on the deal.

By Ottawa CitizenFebruary 22, 2008

Canada and the U.S. have signed an agreement that paves the way for the militaries from either nation to send troops across each other’s borders during an emergency, but some are questioning why the Harper government has kept silent on the deal.

Neither the Canadian government nor the Canadian Forces announced the new agreement, which was signed Feb. 14 in Texas.

The U.S. military’s Northern Command, however, publicized the agreement with a statement outlining how its top officer, Gen. Gene Renuart, and Canadian Lt.-Gen. Marc Dumais, head of Canada Command, signed the plan, which allows the military from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a civil emergency.

The new agreement has been greeted with suspicion by the left wing in Canada and the right wing in the U.S.

The left-leaning Council of Canadians, which is campaigning against what it calls the increasing integration of the U.S. and Canadian militaries, is raising concerns about the deal.

“It’s kind of a trend when it comes to issues of Canada-U.S. relations and contentious issues like military integration. We see that this government is reluctant to disclose information to Canadians that is readily available on American and Mexican websites,” said Stuart Trew, a researcher with the Council of Canadians.

Trew said there is potential for the agreement to militarize civilian responses to emergency incidents. He noted that work is also underway for the two nations to put in place a joint plan to protect common infrastructure such as roadways and oil pipelines.

“Are we going to see (U.S.) troops on our soil for minor potential threats to a pipeline or a road?” he asked.

Trew also noted the U.S. military does not allow its soldiers to operate under foreign command so there are questions about who controls American forces if they are requested for service in Canada. “We don’t know the answers because the government doesn’t want to even announce the plan,” he said.

But Canada Command spokesman Commander David Scanlon said it will be up to civilian authorities in both countries on whether military assistance is requested or even used.

He said the agreement is “benign” and simply sets the stage for military-to-military co-operation if the governments approve.

“But there’s no agreement to allow troops to come in,” he said. “It facilitates planning and co-ordination between the two militaries. The ‘allow’ piece is entirely up to the two governments.”

If U.S. forces were to come into Canada they would be under tactical control of the Canadian Forces but still under the command of the U.S. military, Scanlon added.

News of the deal, and the allegation it was kept secret in Canada, is already making the rounds on left-wing blogs and Internet sites as an example of the dangers of the growing integration between the two militaries.

On right-wing blogs in the U.S. it is being used as evidence of a plan for a “North American union” where foreign troops, not bound by U.S. laws, could be used by the American federal government to override local authorities.

“Co-operative militaries on Home Soil!” notes one website. “The next time your town has a ‘national emergency,’ don’t be surprised if Canadian soldiers respond. And remember — Canadian military aren’t bound by posse comitatus.”

Posse comitatus is a U.S. law that prohibits the use of federal troops from conducting law enforcement duties on domestic soil unless approved by Congress.

Scanlon said there was no intent to keep the agreement secret on the Canadian side of the border. He noted it will be reported on in the Canadian Forces newspaper next week and that publication will be put on the Internet.

Scanlon said the actual agreement hasn’t been released to the public as that requires approval from both nations. That decision has not yet been taken, he added.
Top
jofortruth
Posted: May 5 2009, 03:31 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,435
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Canada and U.S. Renew Emergency Management Cooperation Agreement
http://news.gc.ca/web/article-eng.do?m=/index&nid=427669

QUOTE
December 12, 2008
No. 242

The Honourable Lawrence Cannon, Minister of Foreign Affairs, and the Honourable Peter Van Loan, Minister of Public Safety, today welcomed the renewal of the Agreement Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America on Emergency Management Cooperation.

Minister Cannon and U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice signed the Agreement, which reinforces existing collaboration between the two countries in responding to various emergency situations, in Washington, D.C., today.

"Canada and the United States have a long history of working together in emergency situations," said Minister Cannon. "Renewing this agreement increases our capacity to help each other in times of need. We are pleased to deliver on the commitment to enhance emergency management cooperation that our leaders made at the North American Leaders' summits in Montebello and New Orleans."

"I am confident that the renewed agreement will improve cooperation and strengthen the Government of Canada's readiness to respond to all types of emergencies," added Minister Van Loan.

Building on the tradition of cooperation between Canada and the U.S., the agreement, which renews and updates one signed in 1986, establishes the basis on which the two countries may help each other, for example by sending supplies and equipment, emergency personnel and expert support. It also provides for the integration of response and relief efforts during cross-border incidents. It ensures a comprehensive and harmonized approach to emergency management, and establishes a framework for both nations to respond jointly to emerging threats and work together to protect communities.



QUOTE
Backgrounder

Renewal of the Canada-United States Emergency Management Cooperation Agreement

Renewing the Canada-United States Emergency Management Cooperation Agreement will allow the two countries, and first responders on both sides of the border, to react more quickly and effectively to a broad range of emergencies, such as natural disasters and human-induced incidents.

The agreement updates the original, which was signed in 1986. The new agreement establishes a broad framework for the provision of assistance-such as humanitarian supplies, equipment, emergency responders and expert and professional support-and for integrated response and relief efforts during cross-border incidents.

The 1986 agreement, titled in full the Agreement Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States on Cooperation in Comprehensive Civil Emergency Planning and Management, was the first to formalize Canada-U.S. cooperation on emergency management. It recognized that major emergencies in Canada and the United States can seriously affect the health, safety and security of citizens in both countries. Preparing for such emergencies is therefore a shared responsibility and requires coordinated action.

The 1986 agreement spelled out "principles of cooperation" to guide emergency management authorities. These principles included facilitating the movement of goods and people across the border during an emergency, providing mutual assistance and undertaking joint efforts to plan and prepare for emergencies.

Since 1986, however, the number of actors and agencies dealing with bilateral emergency management has grown. As a result, roles, responsibilities and policy and operational coordination have changed. Similarly, changes in government structure and new approaches to security and emergency management in both Canada and the U.S. called for a renewed and updated framework for bilateral cooperation.

In 2007, leaders at the North American Leaders' Summit in Montebello confirmed the need for renewing emergency management cooperation between governments. Since then, Public Safety Canada, Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Department of State have collaborated to renew the 1986 agreement.

The agreement is part of a number of efforts aimed at reinforcing the two countries' ability to respond to catastrophic events. Other initiatives include developing a protocol for the movement of people and goods across the border during emergencies and the recently completed Canada-U.S. Civil Assistance Plan (CAP). The CAP governs the provision of military assistance to support civil operations in response to floods, forest fires, hurricanes, earthquakes, and the effects of human-induced disasters. It was invoked earlier this year when the U.S. asked Canada's air force to help evacuate Americans in the path of Hurricane Gustav.


Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Canada | Next Newest »
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Enjoy forums? Start your own community for free.
Learn More · Register for Free

Topic Options



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.0769 seconds | Archive