InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Create your own social network with a free forum.

Learn More · Sign-up Now
Welcome to The Great Deception. We hope you enjoy your visit.
You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


Forum Rules Gold Prices!


Pages: (2) [1] 2  ( Go to first unread post )

 *** Mortgage Foreclosures - Mers On Mortgage?, Update: TX Cty audit reveals the fraud!
jofortruth
Posted: Oct 22 2010, 08:02 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



QUOTE
Although only bankers are aware of it, there is a second wave of economic disaster starting to build up that will make the earlier one pale into insignificance. Let us start out with MERS, shall we?

MERS - Mortgage Electronic Registration Inc. - holds approximately 60 million American mortgages and is a Delaware corporation whose sole shareholder is Mers Corp. MersCorp and its specified members have agreed to include the MERS corporate name on any mortgage that was executed in conjunction with any mortgage loan made by any member of MersCorp.
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Oct 23 2010, 11:04 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Fight over who has legal right to foreclose makes mess worse
http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/hous...ures11_CV_N.htm



QUOTE
Updated 10/11/2010 

Disputes over MERS, the company behind scores of foreclosures, are leading to heated battles over the mortgage industry's business practices.

By Stephanie Armour, USA TODAY

When Randy Persten's mortgage was foreclosed in 2008, he looked at the paperwork and found a mystery. A company he'd never heard of — called Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, or MERS — was bringing the foreclosure action against him.

Something didn't seem right. So he got a lawyer and fought the foreclosure, arguing that MERS couldn't foreclose because it didn't own the mortgage note he'd signed promising to pay.

Persten ultimately succeeded in getting the action dropped, only to see a new action brought by a different company that says it is the true owner of his mortgage note. Persten still isn't sure who owns his mortgage.


THIS IS ONE OF THE MAJOR PROBLEMS IN THIS INTENTIONALLY CREATED FIASCO THAT IS MANIFESTING ITSELF AT THE MOMENT SINCE PEOPLE ARE FINALLY DISCOVERING THIS IS IN THEIR MORTGAGE PAPERS!

WE NEED TO SEE SOME HEADS FALL (AT THE TOP) THE BETTER THAN THOU IDIOTS WHO THINK THEY ARE GOD AND WHO CREATED THIS MESS THROUGH DERIVATIVES, CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS AND ALL OF THEIR OTHER INSANITY WHICH WAS FOR THE PURPOSE OF AIDING THEIR NWO AGENDA. THIS DID NOT HAPPEN BY ACCIDENT. IT IS PART OF A PLAN TO REDUCE OUR STANDARD OF LIVING AND TAKE OUR PROPERTY.

UNTIL JUSTICE IS SERVED ON THE BIG BOYZ, WHO CAUSED ALL OF THIS, TRUE JUSTICE WILL NOT BE SERVED IN THIS SITUATION AS WELL AS MANY OTHERS. THE GLOBALISTS DO THEIR DIRTY WORK THROUGH THE CRISES THEY CREATE. SO SOMEONE NEEDS TO GET THEM ON THE STAND, UNDER OATH, AND LOOK AT THAT SIDE OF THIS ISSUE AND BRING THESE DISLOYAL SELFISH IDIOTS TO JUSTICE!

JUDGES, WILL YOU DO THE RIGHT THING FOR A CHANGE, OR KEEP PANDERING TO THESE ELITES YOURSELVES? SURELY SOME OF YOU HAVE SOME INTEGRITY? IF I WAS ON THE STAND I WOULD ORDER EVERY SINGLE DERIVATIVE NULL AND VOID AND WIPE THEM OFF THE BALANCE SHEETS TOTALLY. THEY ARE FRAUD PERIOD! THEN I WOULD DEMAND THAT PAYMENTS BE NEGOTIATED WITH EVERY MORTGAGE HOLDER (WITH A FEW EXCEPTIONS FOR SOME WHO WERE THE REAL DEAL AND NEED TO BE FORECLOSED ON BECAUSE THERE ARE DEADBEATS IN THIS AREA ALSO), AND THEN START PROSECUTING THOSE IN THE INDUSTRY WHO DEFAUDED THESE PEOPLE.

EVERYONE KNOWS THAT WHEN YOU GO TO A CLOSING, YOU DEPEND ON YOUR LAWYER AND ALL INVOLVED TO BE HONEST AND DO THE RIGHT THING. WHAT WE HAVE FOUND THROUGH THIS SHAM, IS THAT MANY DON'T DO THE RIGHT THING, AND THUS DENIGRADE THE WHOLE PROFESSION. THIS CAN NOT BE TOLERATED. THESE PEOPLE MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE, AND THEY MUST LOSE THEIR JOBS AND THE MONEY THEY ROBBED FROM THESE PEOPLE.
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Oct 23 2010, 03:26 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Fraud Factories: Rep. Alan Grayson Explains the Foreclosure Fraud Crisis - MUST HEAR!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqnHLDeedVg...player_embedded


Top
jofortruth
Posted: Oct 24 2010, 10:57 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



QUOTE
Kenneth Eric Trent, P.A. of Broward County has amended the Class Action complaint Figueroa v. MERSCORP, Inc. et al filed on July 26, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida.

Included in the amended complaint is MERS shareholders:

HSBC
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Wells Fargo & Company
AIG
Fannie Mae
Freddie Mac
WAMU
Countrywide
GMAC
Guaranty Bank
Merrill Lynch
Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA)
Norwest
Bank of America
Everhome
American Land Title
First American Title
Corinthian Mtg
MGIC Investor Svc
Nationwide Advantage
Stewart Title
CRE Finance Council f/k/a Commercial Mortgage Securities Association
Suntrust Mortgage
CCO Mortgage Corporation
PMI Mortgage Insurance Company
Wells Fargo
DJS Processing which is owned by David J. Stern.
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Oct 24 2010, 11:41 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Top
jofortruth
Posted: Oct 25 2010, 06:10 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



How to Use MERS on Deed of Trust or Mortgage
http://livinglies.wordpress.com/2009/12/14...st-or-mortgage/


QUOTE
Many Thanks to Sal for pointing out the statute from California.

It is time to use the presence of MERS on the originating loan paperwork as an OFFENSIVE TACTIC. Most states have some version of the statute below. It is simply common sense. A creditor is not a creditor unless they are owed something. A beneficiary is not a beneficiary unless they are a creditor. In the case of a mortgage note, a beneficiary is not a creditor unless it is the obligee on the note (i.e., the one to whom the note directs payment). There is no escaping this logic.

The point is that designating MERS as beneficiary or mortgagee is the same as designating nobody at all. The range of options for the Judge include several possibilities. But the one I think we should concentrate on is that an ambiguity has been raised on the face of every Deed of Trust or Mortgage Deed naming MERS as the beneficiary or mortgagee.  That being the case, it MUST BE JUDICIALLY DETERMINED by a trier of fact (Judge or Jury). Without having a benficiary or mortgagee identified, there obviously can be no enforcement.

So the strategy here would be to force the would-be forecloser (pretender lender) to file a lawsuit establishing the note and mortgage (or deed of trust) by identifying the beneficiary or mortgagee. It would also enable you, in the face of a reluctant judge, to press for expedited discovery for information that the would-be foreclosing trustee or attorney should have had before they started. And this leads to a request for an evidentiary hearing — the kiss of death for pretender lenders unless you don’t know your rules fo evidence (a subject covered in depth in our courses currently in development).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California Mortgage and Deed of Trust Practice § 1.39 (3d ed Cal CEB 2008)

§ 1.39 (1) Must Be Obligee

The beneficiary must be an obligee of the secured obligation (usually the payee of a note), because otherwise the deed of trust in its favor is meaningless. Watkins v Bryant (1891) 91 C 492, 27 P 775; Nagle v Macy (1858) 9 C 426. See §§ 1.8-1.19 on the need for an obligation. The deed of trust is merely an incident of the obligation and has no existence apart from it. Goodfellow v Goodfellow (1933) 219 C 548, 27 P2d 898; Adler v Sargent (1895) 109 C 42, 41
P 799; Turner v Gosden (1932) 121 CA 20, 8 P2d 505. The holder of the note, however, can enforce the deed of trust
whether or not named as beneficiary or mortgagee. CC § 2936; see § 1.23.
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Oct 31 2010, 12:16 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Listen to the Testimony of the CEO of MERS (Time 72:08)
http://www.kkoh.com/FlashPlayer/default.as...5323&ID=1994372


It is just amazing the level of fraud involved in the mortgage implosion, and yet our so called Justice Dept has not brought CRIMINAL CHARGES ON ANYONE INVOLVED! Holder, you are shameful! This time you best bring charges, and not just allow these thieves to be assessed a fine. They will only use the money they have robbed from us to pay their fines and you should know that. DO YOUR JOB!

You need to hear this entire show starting from time 7:00. It reveals how fraudulent these bankers and lenders have been and how they did it intentionally!

This is OUTRAGEOUS!
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Oct 31 2010, 01:03 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



PUBLIC NOTICE CONCERNING LAWSUITS BEING COMMENCED UNDER THE NAME MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC. (”MERS”) AND SUGGESTED DISCOVERY REQUESTS AND DEMAND FOR DOCUMENTS IF YOU ARE SERVED WITH A LAWSUIT BY LAWYERS CLAIMING TO REPRESENT MERS.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/21413004/MERS-In...Interrogatories

SOME GREAT INFO!
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Oct 31 2010, 06:54 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Top
jofortruth
Posted: Nov 11 2010, 01:55 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



PARDON! LIVINGLIES OBTAINS WALL STREET PLAYBOOK: MERS TO BE LEGITIMIZED BY ACT OF CONGRESS
http://livinglies.wordpress.com/2010/11/11...ct-of-congress/

QUOTE
Posted on November 11, 2010 by Neil Garfield

After years of negative judicial decisions about the use of a straw-man on mortgages, MERS was about to lose its existence as well as its credibility. But now all of that is set to change as Wall Street money is pouring into the coffers of those who are receptive (i.e., almost everyone in Congress). The legislation is already being drafted under the interstate commerce clause to ratify MERS and everything it did retroactively. It appears that the Obama administration is ready to pardon all the securitization deviants by signing this bill into law. This information is corroborated by several people who are in sensitive positions — persons who would be the first to know such proposals. Fortunately, there are some people in Washington who have a conscience and do not want to see this happen.

Besides the obvious seediness of this maneuver, it runs roughshod over state property laws, and the rights of investors, homeowners and borrowers. It amounts to a permanent installation of a Federal system that supersedes the county records for recording property rights. Off-record comments I’ve heard from people in power are outraged at this assault on states’ rights. But these people are not legislators, who are getting promises larger than anything in your imagination, if they will support such a bill. It might be couched as a uniform law to be adopted by the states to get around the states rights issues, but it will permanently remove some of the power over property that lies solely within the jurisdiction of the states and place it preemptively within federal jurisdiction.

All of this is scheduled to happen during the lame duck session of congress between now and the end of the this year, 2010. That means in a manner of days, some bill that may look like it has nothing to do with property, mortgages or foreclosures is going to have attached to it a provision whose effect will go even further than the notarization bill that went through Congress like S–t through a goose and almost got signed by the President. We caught that one AFTER it was passed by Congress unanimously but before Obama signed it.

We announced it as an attempt at a presidential pardon to all those who committed crimes in the notarization of documents that were fabricated and forged, all those who committed forgery and perjury and all those who created counterfeit documentation that was presented to courts as original documents.
This time we got the information, we think, before it was stitched into some innocuous looking bill.  If we don’t find it and block it, the plight of homeowners will get that much worse.




THIS IS PURE INSANITY. THE STATES NEED TO START RECALLING OR IMPEACHING THE CONGRESSMEN WHO GO ALONG WITH THIS. NOT ALL STATES HAVE THAT RULE, BUT SOME DO.

OUR CONGRESSMEN WHO AGREE TO THIS MUST BE THROWN OUT OF OFFICE AND SWIFTLY. THEY ARE NOTHING BUT A BUNCH OF SPINELESS MINIONS OF THE ELITE WHO HAVE BRIBED THEM INTO GOING ALONG WITH EVERYTHING HAPPENING! THERE IS NOTHING MORE TREASONOUS THAN THE BEHAVIOR OF THE CONGRESS, ESPECIALLY SINCE 911.
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jun 22 2011, 08:28 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Legal analysts say MERS is down, but not completely out (Note links on sidebar of column also)
http://www.housingwire.com/2011/06/17/lega...8HousingWire%29
http://tinyurl.com/43opqfx


QUOTE
Friday, June 17th, 2011, 3:34 pm

Legal analysts say the way Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems handles mortgage assignments during securitization should be changed, but they reject the idea that MERS is at risk of being completely dismantled.

"Although a few courts may identify perceived deficiencies with the use of MERS in certain contexts, the majority of courts presented with questions regarding the validity of the system continue to accept and uphold MERS’s role as a legitimate cog in the mortgage lending industry," attorneys with K&L Gates said in a new report.

The debate over MERS, a subsidiary of Merscorp, intensified this week when a New York appellate court invalidated a foreclosure, ruling MERS assigned the loan to a trustee without having possession of the underlying note from the originator. While the case struck a chord with MERS critics, legal analysts see the reality surrounding MERS litigation as one that is extremely nuanced and case specific.

While the New York appellate court recently invalidated one foreclosure, the opinion in that case varies from another New York appellate decision, which found MERS may proceed with a foreclosure since the lender transferred the actual note to MERS before the foreclosure action was filed.

Two recent decisions out of the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Southern Michigan also show courts reaching varying outcomes when dealing with MERS-related foreclosures.

Judge Marianne Battani recently denied a plaintiff's request to get a Michigan foreclosure case reheard on the grounds that MERS was not the actual foreclosing party. Another plaintiff in a separate case tried to use a different Michigan court ruling to show MERS wrongfully foreclosed on a property. The court rejected that motion, saying the party failed to present other facts that would weigh against the previous judgment.

William O'Connor, a partner and chairman of the Financial Services Practice at Crowell & Moring in New York, said the takeaway from MERS litigation is not "that MERS is a bad idea."

Instead, he believes the registration system, which jumped over state recording statutes to expedite the assigning of mortgages during a wave of securitizations, will have to change its operations model or be forced to restructure under the weight of coming legislation. O'Connor sees MERS perhaps being turned into a type of approved model for transferring mortgages, but one that complies with state recording and foreclosure statutes.

At the same time, O'Connor views the latest opinion out of New York as significant.

"The courts are saying: 'We have concerns about this system and whether its in compliance with strict state law requirements that are necessary to provide what we call record notice of who actually owns or holds a mortgage,'" O'Connor said.

O'Connor expects MERS to have its hands full as it tries to clean up lingering assignment issues. However, he said the long and expensive process will be similar to steps taken when clearing gaps in title.

"They are going to have to go out, and they are going to have to do the appropriate recordings," he said.

Attorneys at K&L Gates disagree with some of the generalizations about MERS' fate.

"Recently, a few courts have issued decisions that have led commentators to suggest that the direction of judicial opinions recognizing the validity of the so-called 'MERS system' may be reversing course," the attorneys said. "This is not, however, the first time the mortgage lending and servicing community has heard such suggestions."

"While some would portray these recent decisions as raising concerns with the role MERS plays in the lending industry and foreclosure process," the K&L Gates report said, "these decisions are generally limited in scope, are dependent upon state-specific law, or simply offer non-binding judicial commentary."

In a recent New York appellate decision — Aurora Loan Services v. Weisblum — attorneys did note that appellate level courts are closely probing the MERS model, suggesting its business structure is not entirely safe.

The case "is an effort to see problems with the MERS structure and how it has operated, so it has some level of importance," Anthony Laura, an attorney out of New York said at the time. "A couple of things that everyone needs to take away from this case (Aurora): It is a clear signal from this appellate court that it is scrutinizing the MERS structure."

Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jun 29 2011, 02:32 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



A MUST HEAR! Dave Krieger wrote a book "Clouded Titles" and was a guest on a radio show, Audio and book link below:

CLOUDED TITLES: (A MUST READ)
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...?showtopic=9430

Dave Krieger, Paralegal mortgage specialist and author of "CLOUDED TITLES" on The Power Hour talking about the scam 9-28-11 (2nd Hour): (A MUST HEAR!)
http://www.gcnlive.com/programs/powerHour/archives.php


Other dates he has appeared on The Power Hour: (Audio can be found at link above)

QUOTE
SEPT. 10, 2012
AUG. 13, 2012
JULY 23, 2012
JUNE 18, 2012
APRIL 23, 2012
MARCH 19, 2012
FEB. 20, 2012
JAN. 16, 2012
JAN. 2, 2012
DEC. 19, 2011
NOV. 21, 2011
NOV. 9, 2011
AUG. 15, 2011
JULY 18, 2011
JUNE 29, 2011
MAY 23, 2011
APRIL 18, 2011
MARCH 21, 2011
FEB. 22, 2011
JAN. 24, 2011
NOV. 29, 2010
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jul 2 2011, 07:06 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Merscorp Lacks Right to Transfer Mortgages, Judge Says
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-14/m...judge-says.html
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jul 3 2011, 05:53 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



MERS:The Mortgage Database That’s Clouding Millions of Titles
http://www.volklawoffices.com/mers-the-mor...ions-of-titles/
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jul 3 2011, 06:48 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



MERS Many Entities: (Book "Clouded Titles" pg 42)
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...=0#entry5365406

QUOTE
If you examine the timeline of events, you'll see that the first MERS was set up in early 1995. Its founding members included Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the American Land Title Association (ALTA) and about 20 other major players (the lenders).  Its purpose was to act as an electronic database to track mortgages; however, it was only accessible by its members. Now, if you have a MIN (a number listed on your deed of trust), you are supposed to be able to track your own mortgage; however, the author has yet to see anything positive or truthful come out of this database that wasn't lender inputted. In 1999 (a year after MERS #3 was created), the Glass-Stegall Act was repealed. WHY? 

Nobody knows. Is it possible to surmise that bank lobbying efforts had a hand in it? Maybe; because post-repeal is when all of the subprime loans and alleged chicanery started and every county in every state started losing revenue by the massive drop in fees collected at the recorder's office for the filing of security interests to perfect the lenders' positions. This happened because MERS recorded its initial filings for the lenders as their “nominee” and at that point, everything was secretly hidden behind an electronic wall.



Isn't that interesting? Glass-Steagall was repealed the same year the 3rd MERS entity was set up! That is not just coincidence, IMO! So which Congressmen did the lobbyists buy off to repeal Glass-Steagall? Just amazing!
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Sep 28 2011, 09:53 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



MERS Gets a New CEO - Beckmann- Wow, he's from CITIMORTGAGE and just more of the same! They like to change people who get in trouble to make it look like they are dealing with the situation!
http://www.housingwire.com/2011/04/29/mers...e-chief-new-ceo

QUOTE
"We do not have a robust process to make sure all the data on our system was accurate, timely and reliable." (Bechmann said this in an interview recently)



So will anyone hold the last guy accountable that was in the position during all of the scams?

Anything with CITI in it's title is nothing but the same big banker types who have a problem with integrity! So, even though a new guy comes on board, the same scam will continue until THESE BIG BANKERS are bought to justice! They are NOT TOO BIG TO FAIL. THEY MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR FINANCIAL FRAUDS, AND THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF THE BIG BANKERS INVOLVED IN THE SCAM THAT LED TO THE MORTGAGE IMPLOSION AND NOW THE WORST FINANCIAL CRISIS IN PROBABLY ALL OF HISTORY!

CITI History:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...?showtopic=6656

angry.gif
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Sep 28 2011, 12:20 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Registrar in Massachusetts, John O'Brien, Reveals more of the MERS Fraud
http://salemdeeds.com/


LIST OF ROBOSIGNERS THAT SCAMMED THE PEOPLE:
http://www.salemdeeds.com/robosite/RobosignerList.aspx
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Sep 28 2011, 02:53 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



John O'Brien, the Registrar from Massachusetts, a guest on The Power Hour ( see above) mentioned that the guy who represents the Attorney Generals in negotiating with the thug big bankers, Iowa AG Tom Miller, is not doing his job and he has asked Miller to step down. It seems that Miller is getting campaign contributions from these same bankers and not doing due diligence for the consumer! If this is true, Miller is a disgrace!

What Tom Miller is being accused of, and why he needs to step down. This guy is not holding these bankers responsible, he is caving into them! SO WHY DOES HE HAVE THE NEGOTIATING JOB WITH THE BIG SIX OR SO BIG BANKERS! MILLER HAS A PROBLEM! THE GUY IS EITHER CLUELESS OR DISHONEST!
http://dailybail.com/home/iowa-ag-tom-mill...-from-fore.html

Iowa Attorney General TOM MILLER IS CONTRIBUTING TO THE FORECLOSURE PROBLEM! GEE THX, TOM FOR BEING ANOTHER MINION OF THE BIG BANKERS! Do we have no real men left in the court system? What is wrong with these guys?
http://www.iowa.gov/government/ag/tom_miller/

MILLER FIRED SCHNEIDERMAN BECAUSE HE WAS SITTING IN ON THESE NEGOTIATIONS AND WAS ON THE SIDE OF THE PEOPLE! MILLER NEEDS TO BE FORCED TO STEP DOWN. HE IS ON THE WRONG SIDE!
http://dailybail.com/home/ny-attorney-gene...bama-admin.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/22/k...ref=mostpopular

QUOTE
By raising these concerns, Conway has aligned himself with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and law enforcers from other states who have questioned the adequacy of the groundwork underlying the settlement talks.

"Today's economic crisis was caused by Wall Street acting improperly," Conway, a Democrat, said in the email. "Every American has paid the price -- with families losing their homes, investors losing their money, and many Americans losing their jobs. There should be absolutely no criminal or civil immunity given to banks for activity that has not yet been investigated."


angry.gif
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Sep 28 2011, 03:47 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



If you want to check to see if there is a MERS MIN# on your mortgage, go to this link and give them your name and email, and they will get back to you: (See bottom right corner of website):
http://www.protectamericasdream.com/
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Sep 28 2011, 08:12 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



http://homeequitytheft-cases-articles.blogspot.com/
http://www.iwatchnews.org/2011/09/22/6687/...ormer-employees?

Eileen Foster worked for Countryside! She got too close to the fraud and they fired her. She later said:

QUOTE
Eileen Foster, the company’s new fraud investigations chief, had seen a lot of slippery behavior in her two-plus decades in the banking business. But she’d never seen anything like this.


Top
jofortruth
Posted: Sep 28 2011, 08:31 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



THE MERS SCAM STOLE 40 BILLION IN REVENUE FROM COUNTIES ALL OVER AMERICA! AND YOU WONDER WHY YOU SERVICES ARE BEING CUT?


THE BIG BANKERS, MERS BOYZ AND THEIR MORTGAGE COMPANY ACCOMPLICES WHO ARE ALL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MORTGAGE IMPLOSION, BELONG BEHIND BARS! THEY KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING! THEY COMMITTED FRAUD, AND YET DUMMIES LIKE ATTY GEN MILLER AND OTHERS ARE NEGOTIATING WITH THESE SCUMBAGS AND MAKING SETTLEMENTS!

WHAT IS THIS MILLER GUY THINKING? HE NEEDS TO BE THROWN OUT ON HIS HEAD, AND EVEN POSSIBLY PROSECUTED HIMSELF FOR PARTICIPATING IN THE FRAUD, OR FOR BEING INCOMPETENT!

ATTORNEYS, YOU GUYS BEST GET YOUR CRAP TOGETHER AND GO AFTER THESE GUYS, AND DONT STOP UNTIL EVERY LAST CROOK IS BEHIND BARS! THESE BIG BOYZ NEED TO GO DOWN! THEY ARE CRIMINALS!
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Sep 28 2011, 08:40 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Top
jofortruth
Posted: Nov 21 2011, 02:06 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Bombshell Nevada Attorney General Releases Massive Indictment against Robosigners:
http://mattweidnerlaw.com/blog/2011/11/bom...ive-indictment/
http://ag.state.nv.us/newsroom/press/2011/Indictment.pdf

Bond was set at $500,000 per robosigner! This is just the beginning! MERS & all the big bankers, and all these corrupt mortgage lending culprits are going to be rooted out and brought to justice!
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Nov 21 2011, 02:38 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Another Attorney (Ohio) who understands the MERS scam and is helping the public: (Friend of Dave Krieger "Clouded Titles" who broke scam wide open)
http://dannlaw.com/
http://dannlaw.com/practice-areas/homeowne...ng-foreclosure/
Top
jofortruth
Posted: Jan 16 2012, 03:28 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 31,430
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07



Dave Krieger is educating Real Estate Agents, homeowners scammed, investors, etc at his seminars! SIGN UP! YOU NEED TO HAVE THIS INFO. MERS IS A SCAM OF MONUMENTAL PROPORTIONS! LAWSUITS ARE MASSIVE! YOU MUST FIGHT BACK!
http://dave.padnhc.com/

A HUGE CASE IN MASSACHUSETTS:
http://tinyurl.com/6uptfo3
http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer...60-dddbda3c755a
http://www.ma-appellatecourts.org/search_n...p?dno=SJC-11041

QUOTE
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has just issued an unusual order in the very important Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Association case, indicating its deep concern over whether its ruling will have a disastrous impact on foreclosure titles and, if so, whether its ruling should be applied prospectively rather than retroactively.



NEW WEBSITE! MAKE SURE YOUR REAL ESTATE AGENT, LAWYER, Friends involved, SEE THIS INFO!
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Money/Gold/Mortgage Fraud/Economy/Federal Reserve/Corporate America/Cap and Trade Scam | Next Newest »
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Create your own social network with a free forum.
Learn More · Register Now

Topic OptionsPages: (2) [1] 2 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.2437 seconds | Archive