The Great Deception -> ** Hegelian Dialectic & Deceptive Techniques

** Hegelian Dialectic & Deceptive Techniques, Orwellian "Newspeak"-Tactics being used

Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic

jofortruth

Posted: Jun 3 2007, 02:42 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,483
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

EXPLAINS: Hegelian Dialectic, Third Way & Left/Right Paradigm with Charts - 1 PDF w/ docs
http://www.mediafire.com/?n1wminnmxll

-------------------------------------------------------------------
How the Hegelian Dialectic is Transforming the World to Bring in the NWO:
http://power.consumercide.com/hegel-nwo.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
More Info on What this is:
http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/...ks/it/croce.htm

QUOTE

"Hegel calls his doctrine of opposites dialectic, rejecting, as liable to cause misunderstandings, the other formulae of unity and coincidence of opposites, because in these stress is laid only upon the unity, and not at the same time upon the opposition.

The two abstract elements, or the opposites taken in and by themselves, he calls moments, a figure taken from the moments of the lever, and the word "moment" is sometimes also applied to the third term, the synthesis.

The relation of the two first to the third is expressed by the word "solution" or "overcoming" (aufheben). And that, as Hegel intimates, means that the two moments in their separation are both negated, but preserved in the synthesis.

The second term (in relation to the first) appears as negation, and the third (in relation to the second) as a negation of negation, or as absolute negativity, which is also absolute affirmation.

-----------------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegelian_dialectic
-----------------------

How This Can Be Used Against the People:

The Elite use this to foment conflict in order to forge the future shape and direction of human history that they want. They manipulate us, to do their dirty work.

One Example:

If the Congress outlaws guns, this will cause the many Militias that have popped up over the past few years to rise up, and then this will give the government the excuse to implement Martial Law (you can already see these groups being demonized in the media), cease the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Sure, there are bad people in every group in society, but when the ELITE start saying ALL ARE BAD, then you know they're lying. The Elite play games and use people through deception. MAKE SURE YOU ARE NOT ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE!

jofortruth

Posted: Jun 13 2007, 06:34 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,483
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

http://www.letusreason.org/Curren38.htm

QUOTE

However there is another transformation of thinking influencing the world, this re-transformation of thinking is done by what is known as The Hegelian Dialectic or �Consensus Process.

This is a 200 year-old, three-step process of �thesis, antithesis and synthesis�, developed in the late 1700�s by a German named George William Friedreich Hegel that results in what we now know as �group-think.� The Hegelian Dialectic is a Philosophy of man (Col.2:8).

It is a system called �Praxis� that Socialists have used for centuries to seduce, seize and control mass populations without warfare. It is also in full operation here in the United States under such names as: �Outcome Based Education,� �Goals 2000,� �Sustainable Development,� �School To Work,�, �DARE,� �Church Growth,� �Total Quality Management,� �Multi-level Marketing� and many more. It�s all about embracing �tolerance, diversity and unity� for The New World Order. To put it in layman�s terms, it�s brainwashing. A notable 20th century adherent of the Hegelian Dialectic was Adolph Hitler. Adolph Hitler embraced the Hegelian Dialectic as his primary manipulation technique of the masses to build his 3rd Reich.

Karl Marx based his philosophy of history on Hegel�s law of thought, called the dialectic. In this dialectic an idea, or thesis, contains within itself an opposing idea, called antithesis. Out of the inevitable conflict between these opposing concepts is born a third, totally new thought, the synthesis. Applied to history by the Marxists, Hegel�s concepts were used to formulate the notion of the class struggle (Compton�s Encyclopedia - Hegel).

Dialectic: is defined as the art or practice of examining statements logically as by question and answer to establish validity (Funk and Wagnell�s Dictionary). Another Dictionary describes this as �the art or practice of examining opinions or ideas logically, often by the method of question and answer, so as to determine their validity.�

Hegel�s concept of thought is called the dialectic. However, using Hegel�s dialectic removes one from arriving at truth.� In his dialectic an idea, or thesis, contains within itself an opposing idea, called antithesis. From the conflict of opposing concepts gives birth to a new thought, and brings about the wanted change, called synthesis or consensus. The antithesis is where the movement from pursuing truth occurs, and the end result of compromising is achieved. We become like god, self - rulers who decide what is the truth for ourselves, and others.

I first became aware of this process for change a few years ago in a discussion with friend who was involved in the corporate business world and seen it work. As I began to research it a number of other people began identifying its influence and explaining its influence in society and especially in the church. What struck me was how easily this process that could change could be applied in almost any aspect of living.

Hegel�s ideas are used and applied to various facets of life, psychology, religion, and history. While this method has been used by famous thinkers and has a veneer of logic, it really is subjectivism and promotes relativism.� Hagel�s dialectic is logic used illogically. Truth becomes abstract under the Hegelian Dialectic.� Consensus or synthesis is at the core of the Hegelian Principle. Agreement is the object of this principle. What praxis is about is exactly what the New age movements goals are, unlearning your traditional values - to let go of what keeps you from moving toward the new paradigm of whatever it may be, in the case of the New age agenda--global harmony. In other cases it may be used to bring harmony in smaller groups.

�Praxis was later developed in the early 20th century by socio-psychologists (Transformational Marxists) such as Georg Lukacs, Karl Korsch, and Antonio Gramsci� (Vol. 1 No. 1, 1996, The Dialectic & Praxis: Diaprax and the End of the ages by Dean Gotcher).

The use of the word Diaprax, or Praxis it is simply another form for the Hegelian Dialectic. We may not be familiar with these terms but we need to be more familiar in identifying their work. If we can know how it works we can identify the process and not fall for its procedure.

Dean Gotcher who has written extensively on this concept writes, �I call this liberal, New Age, socialist, mental disease diaprax (dialectic + praxis). The dialectic requires everyone using it to willingly question any absolute, prior established fact, or position. Praxis requires everyone to personally experience dialectic behavior in a facilitated, group-think environment where everyone must participate. Using diaprax leads to the abandonment of faith in overt authority (God, parent, teacher, nation, etc.), resulting in defiance against such authority. Using diaprax blinds the user of his dependence on covert authority, resulting in an addiction to covert authority rather than faith in overt authority�� (Vol. 1 No. 1, 1996, The Dialectic & Praxis: Diaprax and the End of the Ages by Dean Gotcher).

This concept started a new development that redefines truth; it removes one from the surety of absolutes and proposes that truth changes throughout history as peoples ideas and cultures change. This becomes a continual process that is never stabilized in absolutes. The old �truth� (thesis) is challenged by a �new concept� (antithesis), which changes ones thinking and the result births a new truth (synthesis), which becomes the new thesis for the next process that will bring change. The change can be ever so slight each time this type of message is heard, as the recipients are moved over slowly to where the speaker wants them to be. Each process of change is actively pursued until the arrived goal is finally reached. Each part is a necessary component for the change. So the means to reach the goal is integrated in the continual process to achieve the goal. But this goal does not have to have anything to do with truth. It is what we identify as relativism (moral, spiritual etc.) its intention is to move people away from the truth.

This is the vehicle by which people are influenced to change their currently held belief systems in order to come to consensus -The means is tolerance, the main objective today is unanimity - unity, that will bring the result of peace and harmony. Lets look at some of the ways this has been used.

jofortruth	Posted: Jul 9 2007, 03:09 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	This is a bit confusing, which is it's purpose, but it's important that you understanding the level of deception in America right now. Just be aware that this is going on. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz93RKI2j_Y Video Transcribed: Hegel created this as a tool of deception. It's of the Occult, and it's intent is to keep you stuck in a system that repeats itself, but never gets to the truth. It's total manipulation being used by the Zionists NWO evildoers to deceive everyone. We are witnessing the true Hegelian Dialectic currently in Society. It repeats itself and causes confusion. It perpetually continues. Explained: Thesis - Some people understand how the Zionists NWO crew are using it. Antithesis - to confuse them so that they don't understand. (negates thesis) Synthesis - Promote a problem reaction solution idea, and force it down the throats of honest truthseekers. (negates both) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- So to address this issue: We should be asking: What's the system that's being perpetually continued? Answer: To keep everyone deceived. What's the thesis: What's causing people to be deceived? Answer: Blatant Lies in addition to the omission of key information that are truths. What's the Anti-thesis: What will negate the thesis? Answer: Exposing the blatant lies and keeping the free flow of information so that no information will be omitted. What's the Synthesis: What can they do to keep this going? Answer: Be a mole of the truth movement and promote fake or lesser truths that hide the bigger truth, the overall truth. In addition, blame someone else for the lies and promote other lies of their criminal network as truthseekers. This nullifies the thesis because some truths are being exposed, but also nullifies the antithesis because the truths that are being exposed will never expose the whole truth and in fact will lead down into a vortex or a deadend. What about the Synthesis then? What's the new system that must be continued? Answer: To keep everyone confused about who to trust. The synthesis is the new thesis for the system. They are fake truthseekers diverting the real truthseekers away from the truth. Antithesis: Is exposing these liars and promoting actual and real truth. Synthesis: Keep this farce continuing by promoting fake exposers for disinfo agents so they gain exposure as truthseekers. This is why there are so many alternate media satellite and radio personalities put there by the liars to sabotage the truthseekers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Examples: Official version of 911 - 19 Arabs, funded by OBL, crashed the planes into the WTC, and had ties to Saddam. The System - To keep everyone from knowing what really happened. Thesis: What is starting point? Official version of the story Antithesis: To negate the thesis. The truth of the events. Synthesis: Create several fallback stories that will never lead to the truth in case the people don't believe the official story. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Now what they're trying to do is to make YOU part of the system and make sure you don't get out of that system. The New Thesis for this system is: The official version of 911 is a lie. Antithesis: To create a story that is opposite the official version as much as possible, but that doesn't lead you to the truth, which is 911 was an inside job, and that the perpetrators are Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld. Synthesis: Is that you will fall inbetween these two camps. You will believe something like: the Arabs are funded by the US Feds, or OBL is a CIA asset, etc etc, or US pulled a Reichstag like Hitler did. They'll keep feeding you information that supports either of the two camps, so you'll be stuck in that system, Unless you understand they're using the Hegelian process on you, it won't occur to you that the Israeli Mossad were behind 911. If you break free from that system, they have another system for you : Thesis: Your doubt that 911 was an inside job, as the fake patriots claim. Antithesis: It was the Vatican, the Jesuits, or other such groups. Synthesis: Is that you will fall inbetween these 2 camps once more. You'll believe that the Vatican, or Jesuits or something influenced Bush, and that he's just a puppet. THIS IS THE REASON THAT 6 YEARS AFTER 911 THERE STILL IS NO SERIOUS INVESTIGATION GOING ON BY ANY GOVERNMENT OF ANY COUNTRY IN THE ENTIRE WORLD. THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE ARE STUCK IN THE SYSTEM PERPETUATED BY THE HEGELIAN DIALECTIC. The only way out of this system is to have an uncompromisable standard to compare this system to. There is only one way out: It's the Bible and Jesus Christ. The Bible warns against the Hegelian Dialectic in Ephesians 4:14. No Word of God = Stuck as a slave to the system

jofortruth	Posted: Sep 10 2007, 07:15 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	THE POWER ELITE'S PLANNED DIALECTICAL "CRISIS" by Dr. Dennis Cuddy http://newswithviews.com/Cuddy/dennis104.htm EXAMPLE OF HOW THE DIALECTIC IS USED TO DECEIVE US

jofortruth	Posted: Oct 28 2007, 03:08 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Putin compares U.S. plan to Cuban missile crisis http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/10/26...e.ap/index.html DOES PUTIN OBSERVE CORRECTLY THAT THE SAME TACTICS ARE BEING EMPLOYED ONCE AGAIN BY THE US TO LIE TO THE PEOPLE?

jofortruth	Posted: Nov 9 2007, 09:18 AM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	The Transformation of America: http://crossroad.to/charts/paradigm-shift.htm http://www.newswithviews.com/Cutler/michael17.htm Quote: "First tactic of using false language to obfuscate an issue I would point to former President Jimmy Carter who began this process where illegal immigration is concerned, by demanding that INS employees stop using the term "Illegal Alien" and replace it with the more genteel and clearly deceptive term "Undocumented Worker." The current occupant of the White House, George W. Bush has offered to "Legalize the immigrants," a statement that is amazing when you consider that this is the equivalent of offering to "Make water wet!" Immigrants are legal, they have green cards." "Second tactic, that of providing supposed "solutions" to a critical problem that makes no sense can be seen in statements made by Vice President Dick Cheney who stated that there are millions of undocumented workers in this country. We don't know who they are, where they are or what they are up to and that is why we need a "Guest Worker" program! .... How would providing millions of illegal aliens with authorization to work in our country deter future illegal immigration?

jofortruth	Posted: Nov 14 2007, 08:13 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	What is the Hegelian Dialectic? http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html Chart that Shows How this Works: http://www.calvertonschool.org/waldspurger...n_dialectic.htm Attached Image (Click thumbnail to expand)

jofortruth	Posted: Nov 28 2007, 05:16 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Antony Sutton on "Left" versus "Right" and the Hegelian dialectic in American politics http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_sutton.html

jofortruth	Posted: Nov 30 2007, 08:19 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	http://www.watch-unto-prayer.org/thirdway.html

jofortruth	Posted: Dec 2 2007, 06:58 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Dialectical Logic: http://www.authorityresearch.com/ARTICLES_...c%20process.htm

jofortruth	Posted: Dec 2 2007, 08:04 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	WILLOW CREEK - HEGELIAN DIALECTIC & THE NEW WORLD ORDER http://etherzone.com/2001/proc121101.shtml

jofortruth	Posted: Jan 31 2008, 01:30 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Techniques Used to Manipulate Groups: http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/f...tion=activities Take a look at these techniques used to manipulate groups: How collectivists create their own opposition - and how not to be fooled by it. How collectivists use the Diamond Tactic to sway public meetings - and how to thwart them. How collectivists use the Delphi Technique to create group consesus at public meetings - and how to thwart them. More about the Delphi Technique to manipulate public meetings - and how to overcome it.

jofortruth	Posted: May 28 2008, 10:57 AM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	UNDERSTANDING HOW THE HEGELIAN DIALECTIC IS TRANSFORMING THE WORLD TO BRING IN THE NEW WORLD ORDER http://www.womensgroup.org/998NEWLT.html

jofortruth	Posted: Sep 7 2008, 09:55 AM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	The Transformation of America http://crossroad.to/charts/paradigm-shift.htm Three kinds of Groups http://www.crossroad.to/charts/dialogue.htm

jofortruth

Posted: Feb 25 2009, 09:52 AM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,483
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

Problem, Reaction, Solution - Hegelian Dialectic:
http://www.indexoftheweb.com/911Why.htm

QUOTE

The Problem Reaction Solution Paradigm� (The Hegelian Dialectic)
1) The government creates or exploits a problem blaming it on others
2) The people react by asking the government for help willing to give up their rights
3) The government offers the solution that was planned long before the crisis

QUOTE

Why?

"The Party seeks power entirely for its for its own sake.� We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power.� Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness; only power, pure power.� What pure power means you will understand presently.� We are different from all oligarchies of the past in that we know what we are doing.� All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites.� The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their motives.� They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and just round the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal.� We are not like that, We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it.� One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes a revolution in order to establish a dictatorship..."

1984 - George Orwell.

See more here:
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...topic=917&st=0&

jofortruth

Posted: Feb 25 2009, 09:55 AM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,483
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...topic=6232&st=0

http://www.indexoftheweb.com/911Why.htm

QUOTE

jofortruth	Posted: May 5 2009, 09:49 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	lUNDERSTANDING HOW THE HEGELIAN DIALECTIC - Free Legal Forms

jofortruth	Posted: May 6 2009, 01:17 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	THE THIRD WAY & HEGLIAN DIALECTIC: http://watch.pair.com/thirdway.html#blair More on The Third Way: (Clinton and Blair biggest proponents of) http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...?showtopic=1210

jofortruth

Posted: Jun 24 2009, 01:04 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,483
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

DIALECTICS, ROCKEFELLERS, AND POPULATION CONTROL
http://www.newswithviews.com/Cuddy/dennis83.htm

QUOTE

Part 1

By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
November 27, 2006
NewsWithViews.com

As I have mentioned many times before, the power elite's favorite means of controlling people is the dialectical process. This often involves creating a "threat" to a particular population. For example, the terrorist threat after 9/11 caused Americans to be willing to give up certain of their freedoms which they had been unwilling to give up before 9/11.

I advise people to look at any incident not just in terms of its face value, but also in terms of how it might fit into the power elite's dialectical process. For example, the CIA in 2003 learned from captured Al-Qaeda operatives about their planned "American Hiroshima" to explode 7 nuclear devices in American cities. Paul Williams, author of THE AL-QAEDA CONNECTION, has explained that several of these devices were developed, sent to Mexico, and slipped into the U.S. Why haven't they been used? They would have if one takes this at face value, because Al-Qaeda wouldn't wait for the weapons to degrade or be discovered. They would not have been used, however, if the operation is really controlled by people above these radical Islamic front men !

Do you think this sounds too conspiratorially outlandish? Then ask yourself this---if Osama bin Laden could find 19 terrorists willing to kill themselves for the cause, do you really think that in the last 5 years he couldn't find any others willing to bring the U.S. economy to a halt by simple terrorist acts nationwide against our rail, food, etc., systems without having to kill themselves in the process? Of course, he could find many such people. But they haven't attacked, have they? Ask yourself, "Why haven't they?" Could it be because they are controlled by those above Al-Qaeda?

Another example of the dialectical process used to threaten a particular population can be seen in the leader of Iran recently making threats against Israel. A tendency of most people is to see this as only that---a radical Muslim's anger toward Israel. But if you look at it as part of a dialectical process, it becomes quite different.

Many times before, I have quoted Lincoln Bloomfield's 1961 study for the U.S. State Department as stating that if the Communist dynamic/threat were greatly abated, the West would lose whatever incentive it has for world government. In case you think this is just a theory, remember what happened to Hungary. By October 28, 1956, Hungarian patriots had driven the Soviets away, but the U.S. State Department then sent a cable to Yugoslavian dictator Tito saying "the government of the United States does not look with favor upon governments unfriendly to the Soviet Union on the borders of the Soviet Union." This was a green light for the Soviets to crush the Hungarians, thus leaving the Communist dynamic/threat alive and well.

Now apply this princple to Iran and Israel. If the radical Islamic (Iranian) threat were greatly abated, Israel would have less incentive to become part of a world government. Just as the American population is being manipulated/controlled, so are the Israelis.

You might ask why Isreal doesn't simply bomb Iranian nuclear facilities, but another part of the dialectical process involves "pressure." Israel, like every other nation, must worry about the consequences of any action, and if it bombed Iran, what would be the responses of Muslims, the U.S., Russia, China, etc., not just militarily but also economically in terms of foreign aid, investments, and the world's oil supply?

One of the families connected to the power elite is the Rockefeller family, as former Congressman William Dannemeyer has recounted that David Rockefeller told him that some men are born to rule, but most men are born to be ruled. Therefore, it would be useful to look at a chronology regarding the Rockefellers and population control:

1) August 1904---EVERYBODY'S MAGAZINE publishes Thomas Lawson's "Frenzied Finance," in which he reveals that Standard Oil (Rockefeller) agents are "in every hamlet in the country," and that once someone is within their network, "punishment for disloyalty is sure and terrible, and in no corner of the earth can he escape it."

2) 1910---The Eugenics Record Office is established at Cold Spring Harbor in New York. It is funded by the Carnegie Institute, and will receive funding from the Rockefeller Foundation which will be founded in 1913. The Rockefeller Foundation also will fund Nazi Dr. Ernst Rudin's eugenics research at the Kaiser Wilhelm Brain Research Institute in Berlin. At the Third International Congress on Eugenics held in New York in 1932, Rudin will be unanimously elected president of the International Federation of Eugenic Societies. Rudin and other Nazis will be transported to the Congress on George Herbert Walker's and Prescott Bush's Hamburg-Amerika Lines.

3) 1911---John D. Rockefeller, Jr., forms the Bureau of Social Hygiene, and in 1913 the Rockefeller Foundation will help organize and fund the American Social Hygiene Association "for reconsideration of public attitudes toward prostitution." Via the National Research Council, the Rockefeller Foundation's Medical Division for many years will fund the horrible sex research of Alfred Kinsey. In the early 1900s, Rockefeller introduces Margaret Sanger to the monied elite who help her form the Birth Control League that will become Planned Parenthood. She eugenically advocates limiting "dysgenic stocks" such as Blacks, Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics, as well as "slum dwellers" such as Jewish immigrants.

4) August 1912---Frederick Gates, head of the Rockefeller General Education Board (GEB, founded in 1902), writes in THE WORLD'S WORK that "in our dream we have limitless resources, and the (rural) people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand."

5) March 27, 1922---THE NEW YORK TIMES reports that New York City Mayor John Hylan yesterday said: "One of my first acts as mayor was to pitch out, bag and baggage, from the educational system of our city the Rockefeller agents" who supported "the kind of education the coolies receive in China."

6) April 11, 1933---Rockefeller Foundation president Max Mason assures trustees that in their program, "the Social Sciences will concern themselves with the rationalization of social control,...the control of human behavior."

7) Fall 1937---Rockefeller Foundation gives a grant to Princeton University to study the influence of radio on different groups, and a grant by the GEB will be made to study how the broadcast of "The War of the Worlds" fit into the Princeton Project.

8) 1937---Robert Havighurst becomes director of the GEB and suggests the "global servant" concept and educating youth for some form of world citizenship.

9) 1939---Rockefeller Foundation organizes a series of secret seminars involving communications scholars with the aim of manipulating Americans to accept involvement in World War II. This is part of a larger effort before 1945 whereby the Rockefeller Foundation underwrites Harold Laswell and Walter Lippmann, who advocated a world in which elites ruled by manipulating mass sentiment.

10) March 27, 1942---Senator Harry Truman refers to the Standard Oil (Rockefeller) dealings with the Nazis as "approaching treason." For part two click below.

QUOTE

Part 2:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Cuddy/dennis84.htm

Chronology continues:

11) 1945---Rockefeller Foundation medical director Alan Gregg begins search for an institution that will see if wartime psychology could be relevant for civilian society. Regarding this, the foundation will fund the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.

12) 1950-51---Rockefeller Foundation chairman John Foster Dulles takes John D. Rockefeller III on a tour of Third World countries stressing the need eugenically to control the growth of non-white populations.

13) 1952---John D. Rockefeller III and John Foster Dulles found the Population Council to fund population control measures.

14) 1959---Rockefeller Brothers Fund (for whom a young Henry Kissinger has worked) publishes THE MID-CENTURY CHALLENGE TO U.S. FOREIGN POLICY, in which one reads: "We cannot escape, and indeed should welcome, the task which history has imposed on us. This is the task of helping to shape a new world order in all its dimensions---spiritual, economic, political, social."

15) September 1961---Former Rockefeller Foundation president Dean Rusk (Rhodes scholar) as Secretary of State publishes "Freedom From War" detailing a 3-stage disarmament plan, including "the disbanding of all national armies...other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to the United Nations Peace Force."

16) 1968---James Simon Kunen's THE STRAWBERRY STATEMENT is published and includes a report from a meeting of the radical Students for a Democratic Society, which indicated they "were offered ESSO (Rockefeller) money to make a lot of radical commotion so they (left wing of ruling class) can look more in the center as they move more to the left."

17) March 11, 1969---Vice-President of Planned Parenthood-World Population Frederick Jaffe's "Activities Relevant to the Study of Population Policy for the U.S." is printed containing a memo to Population Council president Bernard Berelson. It includes examples of proposed measures to reduce U.S. fertility, such as (a) encourage increased homosexuality, (b) fertility control agents in water supply, � encourage women to work, (d) abortion and sterilization on demand, and (e) make contraception truly available and accessible to all.

18) March 20, 1969---Dr. Lawrence Dunegan attends a meeting of Pediatric physicians in Pittsburgh where the speaker is Dr. Richard Day, national medical director of Planned Parenthood (funded by the Rockefeller Foundation) from 1965-68. Dr. Dunegan recounts that Dr. Day said that in the future there will be hard-to-cure diseases created, and that cures for nearly all cancers had been developed but were being hidden at the Rockefeller Institute so that populations would not increase.

19) July 1, 1970---Senate Appropriations hearings are held for the Department of Defense and refer to eminent biologists who believe that within 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent (infective micro-organism), an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired. Tentative plans to initiate a program to develop such an agent were discussed by the National Research Council (remember it was via the National Research Council that the Rockefeller Foundation funded Alfred Kinsey's research). Hearings in the British House of Commons from April 8 to May 13, 1987 regarding AIDS will include the following: "Every biological scientist who has dispassionately studied the virus and the epidemic knows that the origins of the virus could lie in the developments of modern biology....Some who know perfectly well what has happened are deliberately fudging scientific data to keep the heat off them and fellow members of their molecular biological 'club'."

20) 1970---David Rockefeller becomes chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) until 1985. During this time, Rhodes scholar Richard Gardner will write "The Hard Road to World Order" in the CFR's FOREIGN AFFAIRS (April 1974), in which he will advocate that "an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece-by-piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."

21) March 7, 1972---The Rockefeller Commission on Population issues a report advocating population control, stating that further growth of the American population could cause economic problems, and that "in any case, no generation needs to know the ultimate goal or the final means, only the direction to which they will be found." In other words, they will control population, but they're not going to tell us how!

22) August 10, 1973---THE NEW YORK TIMES publishes an article by David Rockefeller praising "the social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership," despite the fact that tens of millions of innocent people have been slaughtered by the Communist dictatorship there.

23) 1973---The Trilateral Commission is begun by David Rockefeller and will issue a report stating that "population planning should be an integral part of social and economic development."

24) 1973---George H.W. Bush praises the Population Crisis Committee (PCC) for having played a "major role in assisting government policy makers and in mobilizing United States' response to the world population challenge." The PCC was founded by General William Draper, Jr. (vice-chairman of Planned Parenthood), and is largely funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.

25) 1973---THE SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION by John D. Rockefeller III is published and applauds sexual liberation and the "humanistic revolution" while disparaging "old-fashioned nationalism."

26) 1974---CFR chairman David Rockefeller (and other globalists) encourage David R. Young to form in early 1975 Oxford Analytica, which will be the first private-sector, overt, global intelligence network. Among its clients will be the U.N., NATO, the World Bank, Chase Manhattan Bank, Bechtel, ChevronTexaco, Shell Oil, IBM, etc. Among its international advisory board will be Rhodes scholar and former U.S. Senator Bill Bradley as well as James O'Toole who is Mortimer J. Adler Senior Fellow at The Aspen Institute. And among its members will be Rick Warren, mega-church pastor and author of THE PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE, who is also a member of the CFR.

27) 1974---Toward the end of the year, John D. Rockefeller III addresses delegates to the Population Tribune in Bucharest, Rumania, and declares that "population planning must be a fundamental and integral part of any modern development program, recognized as such by national leadership and supported fully."

28) December 10, 1974---The National Security Council's NSSM 200, "Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests," is marked "classified" and "confidential." It is proposed by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger (formerly with the Rockefeller Brothers Fund) and will be given final approval by National Security Adviser Brent Scowcroft. The document states that "if future numbers are to be kept within reasonable bounds, it is urgent that measures to reduce fertility be started and made effective in the 1970s and 1980s....(Financial) assistance will be given to other countries, considering such factors as population growth....Food and agricultural assistance is vital for any population sensitive development strategy....Allocation of scarce resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in population control....There is an alternative view that mandatory programs may be needed...."

29) 1975---Rockefeller Foundation president John Knowles in the annual report states: "The web of interdependence is tightening. We are one world and there will be one future---for better or for worse---for us all. Central to a new ethic of making less more is controlled economic growth which conserves scarce resources, provides equitable distribution of income and wealth....It is also necessary to control fertility rates at the replacement level and to achieve zero population growth as rapidly as possible."

30) November 1977---The Soviet NEW TIMES reports that David Rockefeller just sent a message to Kremlin leaders saying: "My congratulations on the occasion of the 60th anniversary of the October Revolution." This is despite the fact that the Soviets have killed tens of millions of innocent people.

31) December 1980---Archbishop Peter Proeku Dery of Ghana reveals that "the World Bank denied loans to Ghana until my country agreed to institute a nationwide contraception and family planning policy. There was also pressure to legalize abortion, although the Church and the people have so far been able to prevent this. For how long, I don't know. The World Bank's attitude shows a total disregard for the beliefs of the people of the Third World." Some years later, Kofi Annan of Ghana will receive the approval of the power elite to become U.N. Secretary-General, and he will do nothing to stop the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Rwandans.

32) April 19, 1985---Jim Grob of "The Rockefeller Project" writes a memo on Seattle Public Schools stationery, and it cautions that "the term 'global education' is an extreme, political hot potato at this time" with "right-wing Christian groups" opposing its use, and that instead of using the term "global education,' district personnel should note that a "temporarily safe term is---multicultural/international curriculum development." For part one click below.

jofortruth

Posted: Aug 26 2009, 10:48 PM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,483
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

Sarah Palin vs Eziekiel Emanuel-Lessons in the Hegelian Dialectic
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=153750
http://www.rense.com/general87/hege.htm

QUOTE

The Hegelian Dialectic is the ideological blueprint for manipulating people into fighting over issues. Skillful use of Hegelian tactics is a requirement for all modern politicians. The ultimate goal of every major political player in the game right now is to weaken both sides of every argument, so that a "middle ground" for the "common good" can be formed between them. This is the simple formula for tricking the world into accepting a totalitarian central government. It's happening in every country on the planet.

When Betsy McCaughey published her article called "Deadly Doctors," she sure opened a big can of political worms. She identified the philosophy of Obama's new health advisor, Ezekiel Emanuel as "communitarianism."

"Emanuel, however, believes that "communitarianism" should guide decisions on who gets care. He says medical care should be reserved for the non-disabled, not given to those "who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens . . . An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia" (Hastings Center Report, Nov.-Dec. '96). " (Betsy McCaughey, founder of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths and a former New York lieutenant governor writing in "Deadly Doctors" about Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, Obama's health policy advisor and brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel)

The problem is, the gods of globalism are still not ready to explain their new philosophy to the American people. Americans are much more effective if they continue to believe their sides still exist and keep the great political divides alive. Awareness of the emerging synthesis of all ideologies (called communitarianism) is reserved for insiders. To become an insider one must agree to go along with the big lie, for as long as the lie remains necessary. Once the world has completely adopted supremacy of communitarian law, the truth about the system won't matter much, because the communitarian police will have community enforcement authority over every individual in the world.

The American public is just not ready to be told the truth about the real philosophy driving all new changes to US law. Citizens age 50 and beyond may never be told. Communitarians insist all nations must be eliminated and that would upset the people who still think the US Constitution and their state constitutions are valid legal contracts. So the former Lt governor of the state of New York provided way more information than the Americans need to know. Something radical had to be done quickly to drive the topic back into obscurity. Just as hundreds of Americans started asking what the heck communitarianism is, the global scriptwriters made major changes to the book. Enter Sarah Palin, stage right.

On the surface it certainly appears that Sarah Palin and Barack Obama's Health advisor, Ezekiel Emanuel, are on "opposite" sides. Sarah clearly represents the fundamentalist Christian Republican Right, while Obama and Zeke obviously represent the open-minded non-denominational Democratic Left. Their millions of followers on both sides are totally convinced the "other" side are the bad guys and their own side is the good guys. This belief in their superior side means they never have to study the other side, or God forbid, to wonder what the outcome of all this fighting may be. Like mad dogs trained to fight in the arena, true believers go for the jugular veins of their opponents without a second thought as to why.

Sarah Palin proved her worth to the communitarians when she entered the national political scene as John McCains' Republican running mate. They made her a star in the best horror soap opera ever written. It might look like they plan to kill her off, but rest assured, they'll bring her back whenever they need her to keep the story line alive. And right now, they need her. Upon entering the staged presidential campaign in a whirlwind of exposure, Palin made an easy target of herself and successfully fueled the inflated egos of every deluded Republican and Democrat in the country. All it took to keep (nonexistent) American attention away from any possible awareness of Obama's communitarian philosophy was to bring a superstar like Palin into the campaign. And all it took to steer (possible) attention away from Emanuel's exposed communitarian philosophy was to bring Palin into the "debate."

"His views aren't limited to this one [the Lancet ] article. In 1996, he wrote a short article for the Hastings Center, in which he expounded upon the role that communitarianism might play in healthcare. Dr Emanuel's bio-ethical views are heavily fueled by adherence to this philosophy of communitarianism. Briefly put, communitarianism is a fairly new political philosophy that emphasizes the role of the community in defining and shaping individuals. Communitarianism focuses on the need to balance individual rights and interests with that of the community as a whole, and that individual people (or citizens) are shaped by the cultures and values of their communities." http://www.politicalevidence.com/2009/08/o...el-emanuel.html

Now the debate is between the most uneducated politician on the national scene and the "esteemed" bioethics professor who cares about people. Their most dumbed down followers argue over who's the nicer, more credentialed player. Communitarian agents scour the Internet forums and steer any discussion of communitarianism back to outdated (and now discarded) left and right theories. The substance of the debate never became centered on the actual and verifiable philosophy that drives the National Healthcare agenda. The only political argument allowed is between the left and the right (just as the only religious debate allowed is between the Christians and the Muslims). These phony, misleading debates are led by second grade bullies who won't acknowledge communitarianism until their teachers make them write it a hundred times on the blackboard. When the American followers are finally told that communitarianism is their new political and justice system, their assigned Borg leaders will make sure everyone reaches consensus and agrees that it's a "good" thing.

Hegelians don't care what the issues are. Neither do they care which "side" they are perceived to be on. Their role is to be a barrier to any authentic political discourse that may arise from thinking people. Hegelians do not think for themselves, they follow orders. They repeat words that have no meaning to them, throw around words they cannot define and have no interest in defining. When asked directly what they mean by a particular word, they always respond with "what do you mean what do I mean?" as if you're just too stupid to be answered. Most followers haven't got the first clue what sustainability, livability, health and safety, and quality of life means. They build "good communities" and only stupid people ask them what they mean by good.

Appealing mainly to the egotistical and self-centered, the Hegelians promote the idea that they and their followers are superior to the common man in every way. Born again Hegelians may not be able to tell us who they follow, but they will always insist their ideas are more "enlightened" than common folks. Over educated, upper academic Hegelians believe God told Hegel the only reasonable future society is a friendly, caring, global police state. Uneducated Hegelians don't even know they're Hegelians.

All unenlightened sheep are to be kept locked inside very publicized dialectical conflicts of opposites. Only the unseen, enlightened few understand the actual goal of all the conflicts. The most useful idiots are the ones who believe their side is the side that cares oh so much more about "people" than the other side. Completely brainwashed Hegelian thinkers go so far as to believe they are born smarter than the other side, with many convinced they were chosen by God himself to rule over all of mankind, forever. Taught to use any stupid argument at their disposal that enrages their assigned opposite "side," their job is to fuel established conflicts and say anything they want, as long as it keeps the masses distracted.

The more outrageous their behaviors, the more outrageous the response is from their gullible public followers. This is why hateful slurs, mocking, sneering, racial insults, un-humorous "jokes," accusations, slander and Godlike condemnations are such a big part of our national political discourse. Like Hegel taught the leaders of the emerging supranational system, ideological conflicts that grow into violent clashes between huge groups of people are the best way to "help" save the world. Follower's on both sides of every conflict use the same, tired arguments because both sides follow the same Hegelian playbook. To the Man, Straw Man, Wag the Dog or fists and guns... they do whatever it takes.

It's not an accident that every rebuttal I get to my articles on communitarianism insist it's an insignificant term that means nothing. I actually just got new comments on my blog that explained the "difference" between liberals and socialists, and anonymous never mentioned the word communitarian once! The debate between communitarianism and US constitutional law will never reach the public until it's completely over. First we all have to come together for a purpose greater than self. Then we can all rise together in perfect harmony, or we can fall into the pits with the others who refuse to be "free."

"Clinton said Obama's election was the first one in which people were "self-consciously communitarian - understanding we are going to rise and fall together.""
http://www.pittnews.com/node/19708

Further Reading
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/13/z...l_n_259155.html
http://www.gwu.edu/~ccps/communitarian_update_n36.html

Volume 10, Number 4, December 2000, E-ISSN: 1086-3249 Print ISSN: 1054-6863, DOI: 10.1353/ken.2000.0025, Gauthier, Candace Cummins., Moral Responsibility and Respect for Autonomy: Meeting the Communitarian Challenge, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal - Volume 10, Number 4, December 2000, pp. 337-352 The Johns Hopkins University Press

About -- Niki Raapana is the co-founder of the Anti Communitarian League, (http://nord.twu.net/acl), a grassroots 2 person, unfunded private research tentsitute that studies communitarianism from a commoner's perspective. Her blog is Living Outside the Dialectic (nikiraapana.blogspot.com), and with her email box so spammed by right and left wing propagandists lately, she now prefers all online comments about her articles be presented there. Niki is also the author of "2020: Our Common Destiny" (a short introduction to communitarian law and the corresponding global political system) and co-author of "The Anti Communitarian Manifesto," presented in 2 parts, "Part One: What is the Hegelian Dialectic?" and "Part Two: The Historical Evolution of Communitarian Thinking."

jofortruth

Posted: Aug 27 2009, 10:08 AM

Administrator

Group: Admin
Posts: 31,483
Member No.: 1
Joined: 1-May 07

Anti-Communitarian League:
http://nord.twu.net/acl/

Living Outside of the Dialetic:
http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com/

The Anti Communitarian Manifesto
http://nord.twu.net/acl/manifesto.html
http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html
http://nord.twu.net/acl/evolution.html

QUOTE

Question: What do George Bush (USA), Tony Blair (UK), Gerhard Schroeder (Germany), Bill and Hillary Clinton (USA), Ariel Sharon (Israel), Mikhail Gorbachev (USSR), Jiang Zemin (China), The Pope (Vatican), Prince Charles (England), Queen Beatrix (The Hague), Amitai Etzioni (Israel/USA) and Kofi Annan (United Nations) have in common?

Answer: Every one of them is a political communitarian, and communitarianism is the synthesis in the Hegelian dialectic. Nobody ever seems to have heard of these things, so we wrote What is the Hegelian Dialectic? and The Historical Evolution of Communitarian Thinking. They were originally published seperately, but we combined them to form our definitive Anti Communitarian Manifesto.

jofortruth	Posted: Aug 27 2009, 11:56 AM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	HEGELIAN DIALECTIC, PANDEMIC & CREATIVE DESTRUCTION http://newswithviews.com/Levant/nancy137.htm http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...=0#entry5344711

jofortruth	Posted: Jun 17 2010, 09:25 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	The Hegelian Dialectic and The Third Wave Synthesis part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxZe3vv2EIE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Wf8MR6B3y4&feature=related THIS SOUNDS LIKE A COMPUTER GENERATED VIDEO AND THE SOUND IS ANNOYING. YOU MAY WANT TO TURN YOUR VOLUME DOWN AND JUST READ IT FOR YOURSELF! IT IS INFORMATIVE IN EXPLAINING THE HEGELIAN DIALECTIC AND THIRD WAY.

jofortruth	Posted: Jun 18 2010, 01:45 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	Left/Right Paradigm - A Control mechanism the elite use to control the masses: http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Decep...opic=7707&st=0&

jofortruth	Posted: Jun 18 2010, 03:06 PM
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 31,483 Member No.: 1 Joined: 1-May 07	EXPLAINS: Hegelian Dialectic, Third Way & Left/Right Paradigm & Charts - 1 PDF w/ docs http://www.mediafire.com/?n1wminnmxll Includes Charts to explain the mechanism used to deceive people!

0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

« Next Oldest | New World Order (NWO) / Globalization / (See Freemasonry under Religion/Cults) | Next Newest »

Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
Learn More · Register for Free